The Galilean wedding is the model for the pre-trib rapture

[WPM]

.I looked it up.
I got it from the Greek inter-linear.
You did a copy paste out of some postribber workbook.
Go to a Greek interlinear
Stop trusting those " teachers" that are making a fool of you.
What site did you copy paste from?

Not so. This is my own study.

More avoiding. This is the Pretrib MO. This is all you have.

The avoided totally exposes your doctrine.

 

[WPM]

STRONGS NT 1537: ἐκ

ἐκ, before a vowel ἐξ, a preposition governing the genitive. Also, it denotes exit or emission out of, as separation from, something with which there has been close connection; opposed to the prepositions εἰς into and ἐν in: from out of, out from, forth from, from, (Latine, ex) (cf. Winers Grammar, 364, 366f (343f); Buttmann, 326f (281)). It is used

Following the postribbber false doctrine is exceedingly foolish.
They lied to you friend.

Have a look at the parallel usage instead of constantly ducking around the biblical evidence. Jesus testifies to how it works: "keep [Gr. tēreō] them from [Gr. ek] the evil.”

This did not indicate (in any way) removal from the earth. Unless you believe there was a physical rapture of the disciplies implied here. Anything is possible with Pretrib. It's hermeneutics are ad hoc and all over the place.

It indicated preservation. This is an easy reality for the unindoctrinated.

 

[rebuilder 454]

Have a look at the parallel usage instead of constantly ducking around the biblical evidence. Jesus testifies to how it works: "keep [Gr. tēreō] them from [Gr. ek] the evil.”

This did not indicate (in any way) removal from the earth. Unless you believe there was a physical rapture of the disciplies implied here. Anything is possible with Pretrib. It's hermeneutics are ad hoc and all over the place.

It indicated preservation. This is an easy reality for the unindoctrinated.

ἐκ, before a vowel ἐξ, a preposition governing the genitive. Also, it denotes exit or emission out of, as separation from, something with which there has been close connection; opposed to the prepositions εἰς into and ἐν in: from out of, out from, forth from,


"Out"
Deny it.
You literally can not accept what it is.
You guys take something so Grey, And weak, and actually think you voided the other verses.
All of YOUR OWN catch phrases totally backfire on you.

 

[WPM]

ἐκ, before a vowel ἐξ, a preposition governing the genitive. Also, it denotes exit or emission out of, as separation from, something with which there has been close connection; opposed to the prepositions εἰς into and ἐν in: from out of, out from, forth from,


"Out"
Deny it.
You literally can not accept what it is.
You guys take something so Grey, And weak, and actually think you voided the other verses.
All of YOUR OWN catch phrases totally backfire on you.

Hello! They were kept from the widespread persecution 2000 years ago as God promised. Do you think they were raptured then?

Whatever way you look at Pretrib it is nonsensical.

 

[rebuilder 454]

Have a look at the parallel usage instead of constantly ducking around the biblical evidence. Jesus testifies to how it works: "keep [Gr. tēreō] them from [Gr. ek] the evil.”

This did not indicate (in any way) removal from the earth. Unless you believe there was a physical rapture of the disciplies implied here. Anything is possible with Pretrib. It's hermeneutics are ad hoc and all over the place.

It indicated preservation. This is an easy reality for the unindoctrinated.

Joseph = escape from pottifers wife
The baby Jesus = escape to Egypt.
The Holy remnant Jews= ESCAPE to possibly Petra.
The church escapes in the 7 letters of Rev.

Concerning temptation, God says he makes a way of escape.

Jesus said " pray that you may be counted worthy to escape the things about to come upon the Earth and to stand before the son of man"

Lot = escape from the trib coming to Sodom.

The two Hebrew spies = escaped from a window at Jericho.

The church escapes the trib as Jesus declared, " Before the Flood there was one taken and one left . Watch and Pray for the Lord Jesus return"

You = God never says, or uses , "escape", for his covenant remnant family.

Bible says different than your teachers.
They have made fools of their followers.

 

[rebuilder 454]

Hello! They were kept from the widespread persecution 2000 years ago. Do you think they were raptured then?

Whatever way you look at Pretrib it is nonsensical.

STRONGS NT 1537: ἐκ

ἐκ, before a vowel ἐξ, a preposition governing the genitive. Also, it denotes exit or emission out of, as separation from, something with which there has been close connection; opposed to the prepositions εἰς into and ἐν in: from out of, out from, forth from



Houston
We have a problem
Lol

 

[rebuilder 454]

Hello! They were kept from the widespread persecution 2000 years ago. Do you think they were raptured then?

Whatever way you look at Pretrib it is nonsensical.

Before the flood.
That is the setting.
One taken/ left ( can not be half the world)...your deal is busted so badly. I know you guys are embarrassed.

Sorry that is so unobtainable to you.

 

[MA2444]

More avoidance. Answer a question with a question is deflection.

Cant you remember that that is exactly what you do to me everytime I ask you a question?!

Haha, you're funny.

 

[rebuilder 454]

Not so. This is my own study.

More avoiding. This is the Pretrib MO. This is all you have.

The avoided totally exposes your doctrine.

Says the guy that changes the parable and has no clue of who the 50-50 are in mat 24.

How busted do you need me to make your false deal?

 

[rebuilder 454]

Cant you remember that that is exactly what you do to me everytime I ask you a question?!

Haha, you're funny.

That is exactly what the dems do to Trump and true Republicans.
They accuse of what they do.

All this is part of the great deception.
We saw it with Obama. Believers carried away by a lying devil
Makes no sense.
Never will.
Stick their noses in verses.
MAKE them refute the bible.

 

[rebuilder 454]

Anyone want to attempt to unpack the virgins parable of mat 25????

Or who the 50-50 taken/ left are of mat 24???
So simple and basic. Everyone can see it. Correct?????
Ok just try
What can it hurt?????

 

[rebuilder 454]

Anyone want to attempt to unpack the virgins parable of mat 25????

Or who the 50-50 taken/ left are of mat 24???
So simple and basic. Everyone can see it. Correct?????
Ok just try
What can it hurt?????

Oh my brother.....
Please....
You are asking for a miracle!!!!!
Lol

 

[The Light]

You Pretibbers seem incapable of addressing Posttrib rebuttals. I wonder why? They expose your position.

All you rebuttals are easily dispatched when we realize there are two raptures. One before the seals are opened and one immediately after the tribulation. And it's not the current Church that is raptured from the earth immediately after the tribulation. Additionally, you have the Church going through the wrath of God when we are not appointed to wrath.

God's people have always been in tribulation.

Right but it's not the tribulation OF THOSE DAYS. The tribulation of those days does not begin until the AOD is set up.

Your view is POST WRATH and you don't even understand that.

 

[rebuilder 454]

Woah....
What a massacre!!!!!
Nothing but ashes left.
No more fun.
C'mon guys.

Cue postrib workbooks frantic shuffling for help.
Lol

 

[rebuilder 454]

Not so. This is my own study.

More avoiding. This is the Pretrib MO. This is all you have.

The avoided totally exposes your doctrine.

Oh, no wonder it has verses omitted.

 

[rebuilder 454]

Hard to see it , but blow it up to view postribbers sitting in rubble high fiveing each other.

 

[Randy Kluth]

Pot <> kettle friend
Get real
Stop playing little games

I gave you an opportunity to explain, and you chose to ignore it. Done with you.

 

[The Light]

Have a look at the parallel usage instead of constantly ducking around the biblical evidence. Jesus testifies to how it works: "keep [Gr. tēreō] them from [Gr. ek] the evil.”

This did not indicate (in any way) removal from the earth. Unless you believe there was a physical rapture of the disciplies implied here. Anything is possible with Pretrib. It's hermeneutics are ad hoc and all over the place.

It indicated preservation. This is an easy reality for the unindoctrinated.

I guess you can't figure out that this proves nothing.

What does this change. Does it change Rev 3:10? Nope.

 

[Randy Kluth]

Who are the 50-50 taken,left of mat 24?
What setting is declared in "before the flood " of mat 24?
What part of the trib, is Jesus coming with a sickle?
(No horses, not the main rapture of 1 thes 4?)
" honestly " address the verses

You said,
It is you that can not show us a single verse of a postrib rapture!
how ironic that you guys are " verseless"

I responded:
How dishonest you are! I've cited Dan 7 as the original source of Postrib. I've cited the Olivet Discourse as Jesus' statement that he will *only* come when he comes from heaven. I've cited 2 Thes 2 where Paul doctrinally demands acceptance that Christ will only come when he comes to destroy Antichrist "with the breath of his mouth." I've cited Revelation as showing the dead are raised in the 1st resurrection, after Christians have been martyred by Antichrist.

Conclusion:
You've chosen to ignore the above. What value in further discussion?

 

[Randy Kluth]

Like " before the flood" of mat 24?
I just read it and watch yall butcher it.

Rev 14: 14
Another one, I just read it, and report it ,while yelling never knew of it till we took you guys to school.
Not to mention the comical ,silly changes ,you guys do to the virgins parable.
( that one always is entertaining)
( I look forward to more laughter should any postribber " unpack " it)

Oh the irony!!!!

parables and symbolic language stuffed w/ Pretrib propaganda--zero biblical doctrine, no explicit biblical teaching