rebuilder 454
Well-Known Member
Yes rev14: 14 is a debate to you.Yep. My belief is that the approach we should take is to establish the foundation of our doctrine on clear, straightforward scripture. And only after doing that should we try to interpret the more difficult scriptures contained in prophetic books that undeniably contain a lot of symbolism. Not that they only contain symbolism, but there's still a good amount of it.
But, the pretrib approach is just the opposite. The foundation of their doctrine is based upon interpretations of some of the most highly debatable verses and passages in all of scripture and they force what should be clear and straightforward scriptures to agree with their interpretations of those other highly debatable scriptures.
I just read it and believe it.
"Before the flood" of mat 24 is a debate to you.
I just read it and see 50-50 are gathered/ left
BEFORE the flood.
You read Acts 1 and see Jesus leaving on a horse going to kill the beast, with millions of saints on horses .( postribber " like manner ")
I just read it and see what it says.
( a solo Jesus quietly leaving with only his People involved, in peacetime and normal life)
Postribbers are oblivious to the phrase " like manner"