Can you provide your translation or interpretation of John 17:1-5? I would like to know what was said and to whom Jesus spoke to. A short commentary may be in order. Thanks.You are mistranslating that verse.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Can you provide your translation or interpretation of John 17:1-5? I would like to know what was said and to whom Jesus spoke to. A short commentary may be in order. Thanks.You are mistranslating that verse.
Jesus made the claim that the Father is greater than I as man, a servant who was obedient, who relinquished His power and glory and emptied Himself. After He ascended, His glory was given back to Him. But He was fully God while fully man.However, there is a ranking...an order to heavenly things that begins with the stature of God.
Jesus and Father are one. He is the exact expression of His Father. Being conformed into the likeness of Christ is no less than the likeness of the Father.We are to grow into the full stature of Christ. Is that the same stature as the Father...? No
Jesus would say, "Judge me by my size do you em?"Jesus Christ is a small enough piece of God that we can fit into
Do you know anything about chess?Can you provide your translation or interpretation of John 17:1-5? I would like to know what was said and to whom Jesus spoke to. A short commentary may be in order. Thanks.
Thank you for your answer to my question concerning your view of John 17:1-5. It is well notedDo you know anything about chess?
No skin off my hide.Thank you for your answer to my question concerning your view of John 17:1-5. It is well noted
I see it, Jesus’s God has anointed him with the oil of gladness. Thanks for pointing this out.No skin off my hide.
The point of my question was to save us both time from taking your long route to get to the same place we could've gotten in a much shorter time if we took my route.
This is even better.
If you can't provide a single verse, from the rest of the 31,101 verses in Scripture, to support your opinion that Jesus is stating that the Father is the only true God in that verse, you're just as bankrupt in your argument as the rest who are arguing for it.
There are many verses to prove otherwise and if you can read Hebrews 1, specifically verses 8-10, and not see that God Himself declares Jesus to be God, you have zero credibility in any discussion of the Bible.
I hope that is well noted.
Seems as if there was a lot of anointing going on in the New Testament. I wonder if the posters also believe the apostles of Jesus were God, I only ask because they also became sons of God, yet not one of them called Jesus Father. Anyway seems odd to me they would call Jesus Christ and not Father.Thank you for your answer to my question concerning your view of John 17:1-5. It is well noted
Yeah, no problem there, buddy.I see it, Jesus’s God has anointed him with the oil of gladness. Thanks for pointing this out.
Jesus called Himself the Father.not one of them called Jesus Father. Anyway seems odd to me they would call Jesus Christ and not Father.
As usual, it was me who started this thread re the Deity and Triune Godhead but things have escalated way out of control.
Shalom to you and family
J
No.. I don’t see it that way, we have too view the whole word of God. Jesus as scripture states is the image of the invisible God.Yeah, no problem there, buddy.Jesus called Himself the Father.
John 14:9
Can you see that too? :)
You're welcome.
- when was Jesus born?
Irrelevant.Where you born, or did you pre exist?
In the beginning. And Jesus was there and Jesus created everything.When did Gods creation begin?
Please do not assume you know me or know what is good for both of us. It would seem what is good for you at this moment however is for you to figure out why you are so abrasive, crude and wild with your hyperbolic language. Is this your loud big defensive move as in chess to deflect the glaring onslaught of truth that you do not understand John 17:1-5? It is apparently so. And you would then lose as you think it is all a game to you. You are way over your head here. This is not from pride it's from observed experience and knowledge I have gathered over time, and from your posts for sure.No skin off my hide.
The point of my question was to save us both time from taking your long route to get to the same place we could've gotten in a much shorter time if we took my route.
This is even better.
If you can't provide a single verse, from the rest of the 31,101 verses in Scripture, to support your opinion that Jesus is stating that the Father is the only true God in that verse, you're just as bankrupt in your argument as the rest who are arguing for it.
There are many verses to prove otherwise and if you can read Hebrews 1, specifically verses 8-10, and not see that God Himself declares Jesus to be God, you have zero credibility in any discussion of the Bible.
I hope that is well noted.
The above sums up well the kind of debates I have had over the years concerning this subject. The scripture you place before them is ignored, and you do have the plainest of scripture concerning this subject. They are only willing to discuss their own content, which they have to theologise to try and overturn the plainest of scripture on this subject you present. When you do address their scripture and prove them wrong, they quickly go onto other scripture, it becomes a debate where you can only actually discuss what they want to discuss. I have grown weary of that, so I far less indulge them in such one sided conversations these days. So now I try to narrow it down to what a person must believe concerning the title of Christ to be saved. I'm finding now, most deflect from answering, as they have probably read previous posts. If they say you must believe Christ is the one true God to be saved you can respond. Then you believe a person will be condemned on the day of judgement for standing on the plain words of Christ when he walked this earth. In all honesty I cannot fathom how anyone could have such an absurd view. Theology gone mad in my opinion. Its very different in the churches themselves in my experience, you get none of this.Have you noticed that the ones that write generally the 'loudest' and are void of presenting any scripture commentary, and with fruitless zeal, presenting only the same recycled and canned scripture, are the same ones who never want to to discuss you input, only theirs. They are desperate to be heard to convince you they are right without even an ounce of credibility, to defend their doctrine that they have been engrained with, absent of the spirit's approval or validation.
They want to get the last word in, to create for themselves an atmosphere of some sort of victory like they have won something over you. Whilst you on the other hand are perfectly happy to discuss their inputs along with your own in confidence and without too much fanfare.
I agree with all you've said.Jesus made the claim that the Father is greater than I as man, a servant who was obedient, who relinquished His power and glory and emptied Himself. After He ascended, His glory was given back to Him. But He was fully God while fully man.
The order to heavenly things before the foundation of the world was Jesus created everything!
(Col. 1:16-17)
The order of heavenly things AND earthly things is Jesus is in full authority!
Jesus and Father are one. He is the exact expression of His Father. Being conformed into the likeness of Christ is no less than the likeness of the Father.
Jesus would say, "Judge me by my size do you em?"
There is no perception of Jesus that can be put in terms of our concept of the physical realm ...."small enough"? THE All Mighty God WHO IS IN CONTROL of the entire universe and heaven ... small? I think you need to retract that one.
[QUOTE="Pearl, post: 1316166, member: 8155"]To inherit eternal life we have to come to God through Jesus in repentance and be open to the changes the Holy Spirit will make within us. Saying it is not enough it has to be a genuine love and genuine repentance
@GodsGrace No way, right?I should take note of a post?
Whose post?
It supersedes the written Word?
Right farouk, nothing supercedes the written word of God.@GodsGrace No way, right?
On that last point you mentioned, and you have brought it up before. In my opinion, Internet Trinitarians have gone extreme in their doctrinal views. My Dad who has passes 12 years now was a RC and spoke broken English when he came over to England and reunited with his family during and after WWII. I believe he never knew of a trinity and its concept, and I would wager he would not believe anyone who said Jesus was the same or equivalent to his Father. In fact I know he would get very upset and walk out.The above sums up well the kind of debates I have had over the years concerning this subject. The scripture you place before them is ignored, and you do have the plainest of scripture concerning this subject. They are only willing to discuss their own content, which they have to theologise to try and overturn the plainest of scripture on this subject you present. When you do address their scripture and prove them wrong, they quickly go onto other scripture, it becomes a debate where you can only actually discuss what they want to discuss. I have grown weary of that, so I far less indulge them in such one sided conversations these days. So now I try to narrow it down to what a person must believe concerning the title of Christ to be saved. I'm finding now, most deflect from answering, as they have probably read previous posts. If they say you must believe Christ is the one true God to be saved you can respond. Then you believe a person will be condemned on the day of judgement for standing on the plain words of Christ when he walked this earth. In all honesty I cannot fathom how anyone could have such an absurd view. Theology gone mad in my opinion. Its very different in the churches themselves in my experience, you get none of this.