Offenders in the kingdom

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

tailgator

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2024
2,845
221
63
61
North Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
In Matthew 13:24-25 a man sowed good seed in His field, then the enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat.

If the kingdom hasn’t been established yet and only takes place in a future millennium then that is when Satan will sow the tares. How can Satan do that when he is in the bottomless pit?



The millinium comes after Christ comes and the weeds that are in the promised land today are burned up.


You don't think there are any weeds in the land promised to Jesus?
Really?
 

grafted branch

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2023
1,377
235
63
48
Washington
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Just like us we our in the world but not of the world

There are many people who attend church but are unrepentant thus they are in the church (kingdom)but not of the church
Right, I agree there are unsaved people in the corporate church but John 3:5 can’t be referring to the corporate church unless someone can lose their salvation or be born again and then be not born again.
 

grafted branch

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2023
1,377
235
63
48
Washington
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The millinium comes after Christ comes and the weeds that are in the promised land today are burned up.
Ok, then Jesus sowed the seed in His kingdom already along with Satan sowing the tares.

The kingdom of God has not been established in the promised land yet .That does not take place till the seventh Trump.
How do you come to this conclusion if Jesus and Satan have already sowed their seeds?
 

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
1,448
451
83
67
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
After the cross it was impossible to enter the kingdom through the Law because the new covenant went into effect. So the offenders entered the kingdom through the Law, prior to the scribes and Pharisees, and were purged in 70AD.

Look what you are arguing here, then compare to the following which is clearly already meaning before the cross not after it.

John 3:1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:
2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

What you submitted per Matthew 23, the above was already applicable at the time.

Like it or not, accept it or not, NOSAS is 100% relevant to this topic. To try and understand this topic by ignoring/disregarding NOSAS is an attempt in vain to try and understand this topic. All that leads to is untruths and false teachings.

Once again your view doesn't allow everyone to have an equal opportunity to enter the kingdom of God willfully initially. Just because one has to be born again in order to enter the kingdom of God does not guarantee they can't die again. Meaning the 2nd death in this case. The ones Jesus said He never knew them in Matthew 7, they are obviously going to die again, meaning the 2nd death. Yet they were initially born again first. It just didn't pan out for them in the end. They ended up being workers of iniquity rather that doing the will of His Father which is in heaven.

Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?


Let's be real here. Atheists, unbelievers(thus not saved), and unbelieving Jews, for example, couldn't possibly be meant here. No way have atheists nor unbelieving Jews, nor unbelievers professed to have cast out devils in His name, etc. Only a believer can profess to having done that. Atheists, unbelievers(thus not saved), and unbelieving Jews, for example, couldn't care less about doing any of these things---prophesying in His name, casting out devils in His name, and in His name doing many wonderful works. Some argue that none of these were ever initially saved to begin with. But if that is true why are the unsaved professing to have done things only the saved would be doing? Where is the logic in that?
 

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
1,448
451
83
67
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Ok, then Jesus sowed the seed in His kingdom already along with Satan sowing the tares.

Once again, keeping in mind Amil has satan sowing the tares during the millennium when satan is in the pit. Premil doesn't. When satan is sowing the tares it is meaning in the here and now, the same here and now that Amils have satan sowing the tares while satan is in the pit. I see this being problematic for Amils not Premils. If you see it being problematic for Premils as well, can you expand on why it might also be problematic for Premils since the sowing of the tares by way of the devil would be in the past at this point? IOW, per Premil how could any of this still be relevant once the millennium begins post the 2nd coming of Christ?
 

grafted branch

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2023
1,377
235
63
48
Washington
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Matthew 7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?


Let's be real here. Atheists, unbelievers(thus not saved), and unbelieving Jews, for example, couldn't possibly be meant here. No way have atheists nor unbelieving Jews, nor unbelievers professed to have cast out devils in His name, etc. Only a believer can profess to having done that. Atheists, unbelievers(thus not saved), and unbelieving Jews, for example, couldn't care less about doing any of these things---prophesying in His name, casting out devils in His name, and in His name doing many wonderful works. Some argue that none of these were ever initially saved to begin with. But if that is true why are the unsaved professing to have done things only the saved would be doing? Where is the logic in that?
Unbelieving Jews are most like in view in Matthew 7.

In Matthew 12:24 the Pharisees said Jesus cast out devils by Beelzebub the prince of the devils. Then in Matthew 12:27 Jesus says by whom do your children cast them out. Unless you think the Pharisees children were somehow believers in Jesus, they were casting out devils in the name of God, maybe Jehovah, LORD, or some other name but very doubtful it was in the name of Jesus.

When those in Matthew 7:21-23 say Lord, Lord they could very well be referring to the Old Testament references to Jesus, in which they did prophecy and cast out devils, all the while denying Jesus Christ was the fulfillment of the Old Testament.

As far as atheists, I don’t think Matthew 7 is talking about them.
 

grafted branch

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2023
1,377
235
63
48
Washington
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Once again, keeping in mind Amil has satan sowing the tares during the millennium when satan is in the pit. Premil doesn't. When satan is sowing the tares it is meaning in the here and now, the same here and now that Amils have satan sowing the tares while satan is in the pit. I see this being problematic for Amils not Premils. If you see it being problematic for Premils as well, can you expand on why it might also be problematic for Premils since the sowing of the tares by way of the devil would be in the past at this point? IOW, per Premil how could any of this still be relevant once the millennium begins post the 2nd coming of Christ?
Satan sowing the tares prior to a Premil millennium isn’t an issue, it’s when some Premil try to place the parable of the tares as occurring in the millennium, that causes the issue.

Some people on the one hand want to say the kingdom hasn’t been established yet but Satan has already sown the tares. The problem is both Jesus and Satan sow the seeds in His field which contradicts the kingdom not being established yet.
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
10,356
10,827
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Kingdom of God was established when Christ resurrected and then ascended to heaven to his Father. This is still the state of the Kingdom today - immature and still growing.

Both believers and unbelievers inhabit this Kingdom today, not yet matured and finalized. It is not ready for the Son to hand it over to the Father yet. It will need a complete cleansing where only genuine believers can 'go into' and stay the final form of the Kingdom. The offenders and unbelievers will be permanently separated out of and away from the Father....
 

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
1,448
451
83
67
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Check your version that you used because the NKJ and others says only those who see the kingdom of God Not enter the kingdom of God

The context also shows they they were false not true saints

Look what the KJV says, though.

John 3:1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:
2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.

It says both except you seem to be ignoring that or that you overlooked it somehow. You are not going to argue that verse 3 is in regards to being born again but verse 5 isn't, right?
 

grafted branch

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2023
1,377
235
63
48
Washington
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Kingdom of God was established when Christ resurrected and then ascended to heaven to his Father. This is still the state of the Kingdom today - immature and still growing.

Both believers and unbelievers inhabit this Kingdom today, not yet matured and finalized. It is not ready for the Son to hand it over to the Father yet. It will need a complete cleansing where only genuine believers can 'go into' and stay the final form of the Kingdom. The offenders and unbelievers will be permanently separated out of and away from the Father....
Are you saying unbelievers inhabit the kingdom but haven’t actually entered it? How would that be possible?
 

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
1,448
451
83
67
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Kingdom of God was established when Christ resurrected and then ascended to heaven to his Father. This is still the state of the Kingdom today - immature and still growing.

Both believers and unbelievers inhabit this Kingdom today, not yet matured and finalized. It is not ready for the Son to hand it over to the Father yet. It will need a complete cleansing where only genuine believers can 'go into' and stay the final form of the Kingdom. The offenders and unbelievers will be permanently separated out of and away from the Father....

What are you meaning by unbelievers, though? All the unsaved lost in general, including atheists, for example? If yes, in what way are atheists in the kingdom of God when one can not even see and enter the kingdom of God to begin with unless they are born again first?

John 3:1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:
2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
 

grafted branch

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2023
1,377
235
63
48
Washington
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
It says both except you seem to be ignoring that or that you overlooked it somehow. You are not going to argue that verse 3 is in regards to being born again but verse 5 isn't, right?
Here’s what Pulpit commentary says on that …



Our Lord modifies the last clause, and speaks of entering into the kingdom of God rather than perceiving or discerning the features of the kingdom. Some have urged that ἰδεῖν of ver. 3 is equivalent to εἰσελθεῖν εἰς of ver. 5. The vision, say they, is only possible to those who partake of the privileges of the kingdom. But the latter phrase does certainly express a further idea - a richer and fuller appreciation of the authority and glory of the King; just as the "birth of water and of the Spirit" conveys deeper and further thought to Nicodemus, than did the previously used expression, γεννηθῇ ἄνωθεν.
 

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
36,667
24,012
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Matthew 13:41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

John 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. (Also see Matthew 5:20 & 18:3).

I have a question, how did those that offend and do iniquity get into the kingdom? Is it possible to be born of water and Spirit and not be saved?

A clue might be found in the parable of the wedding banquet in Matthew 22:1-14. In verse 11-12 the king sees a man without a wedding garment and asks him how he came in without a garment, but no explanation of how that happened is given.

So, how do those that offend get into the kingdom?
Jesus moves in, takes over His kingdom on the earth, and gets rid of all who don't belong.

Much love!
 

grafted branch

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2023
1,377
235
63
48
Washington
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Jesus moves in, takes over His kingdom on the earth, and gets rid of all who don't belong.

Much love!
How did those who don’t belong get into the kingdom when John 3:5 says a person must be born again to enter the kingdom?
 

Davidpt

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2023
1,448
451
83
67
East Texas
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Jesus moves in, takes over His kingdom on the earth, and gets rid of all who don't belong.

Much love!

Why then is there a rebellion after the millennium, if before the millennium Jesus already got rid of all who don't belong? This assuming Premil. Maybe you are not a Premil, though? Can't remember if you are or are not.
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
10,356
10,827
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What are you meaning by unbelievers, though? All the unsaved lost in general, including atheists, for example? If yes, in what way are atheists in the kingdom of God when one can not even see and enter the kingdom of God to begin with unless they are born again first?

John 3:1 There was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews:
2 The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God: for no man can do these miracles that thou doest, except God be with him.
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God
4 Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born?
5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
All peoples, of all spiritual persuasions, since the time of Christ's resurrection are in 'this Kingdom.' This Kingdom is not cleansed (weeded out) yet, until a future time. And today and as time progresses until that 'end,' only the believers have secured and truly ENTERED INTO the final form of Kingdom today in faith for transformation and thus salvation.
 

The PuP

New Member
Nov 7, 2022
43
7
8
62
puxico
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Sure, so how did those who offend get into the kingdom in the first place?
They are already there. It is not until the kingdom (that the Son shall be given) IS PURGED OF THE OFFENDERS that "... THEN shall the righteous shine as the Son. " Glorification of the saints does not happen until the offenders are removed from the kingdom. The millennial kingdom will not begin until the offenders are purged.

Mat 13:42-43 KJV 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Be Blessed
The PuP
 

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
36,667
24,012
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Why then is there a rebellion after the millennium, if before the millennium Jesus already got rid of all who don't belong? This assuming Premil. Maybe you are not a Premil, though? Can't remember if you are or are not.
I'm pre-mil.

More people will be born, who will choose to rebel against Jesus.

Much love!
 

marks

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2018
36,667
24,012
113
SoCal USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
How did those who don’t belong get into the kingdom when John 3:5 says a person must be born again to enter the kingdom?
There will be in this world righteous and wicked when Jesus returns. He establishes His kingdom on this earth, and removes the wicked.

There is more than one kind of kingdom.

Much love!
 

grafted branch

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2023
1,377
235
63
48
Washington
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
They are already there. It is not until the kingdom (that the Son shall be given) IS PURGED OF THE OFFENDERS that "... THEN shall the righteous shine as the Son. " Glorification of the saints does not happen until the offenders are removed from the kingdom. The millennial kingdom will not begin until the offenders are purged.

Mat 13:42-43 KJV 42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Be Blessed
The PuP
Ok, so Jesus sowed first then Satan sowed the tares. In Matthew 13:24 both the good seed and the tares are sown in His field. When did Jesus loose the field that will be given back to him?