The OP claims it has it has Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture. Let's see if that might be so by looking at some of this per the following angle.
And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them(Revelation 20:4)
Let's start with this, but unfortunately, some Amils, maybe even all Amils, apparently think the OT can never help explain anything in the NT, it is always the other way around, in every single case. Whatever. If you say so. I don't agree, though.
Daniel 7:21 I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;
22 Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.
The reason why I included verse 21 is because that is obviously involving the 42 month reign of the beast that must precede the 2nd coming. Therefore, verse 22 is obviously meaning the 2nd coming since we know from the NT it is the 2nd coming that puts an end to the 42 month reign of the beast.
And what does verse 22 record? This---and judgment was given to the saints of the most High---almost word for word exactly what Revelation 20:4 records here---and judgment was given unto them
In the KJV these two portions would like this side by side.
and judgment was given to the saints of the most High
and judgment was given unto them
Obviously, now we know without a doubt who the 'them' are meaning in Revelation 20:4. According to Daniel 7:22 they are meaning the saints of the most High. It can't get any clearer nor plainer than this. And that Daniel 7:22 is meaning as of the 2nd coming, this is when judgment is given to them. Therefore, also revealing the correct era of time meant in Revelation 20:4, obviously.
But instead of Amils accepting this, they look for ways to alter the meaning and era of time meant here by using similar tactics that preterists use, though it is crystal clear as to the meaning and era of time meant here. And it is obvious why Amils do this. Because if they don't do it they then have to admit their doctrine of Amil simply can't work after all. IOW, they place their doctrines high above the truth.
Thus, they use similar tactics that preterists employ by insisting a different era of time is meant rather than the actual era of time meant. For example, how preterists interpret this generation shall not pass, in the Discourse.
Daniel 7:22 is undeniably meaning the beginning of the millennium. Daniel 7:22 is undeniably involving the 2nd coming since verse 21 is undeniably involving the 42 month reign of the beast, and that the 42 month reign of the beast undeniably precedes the 2nd coming. Yet, the OP insists it has Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture...lol. As if Daniel 7:22 agrees with Amil rather than Premil.
Even if Amils admit that Daniel 7:22 is involving the beginning of the millennium, they then have to employ preterist-like tactics in order to change the coming in verse 22 to be involving the first coming rather than the 2nd coming. Which then makes total nonsense out of verse 21 which has to precede verse 22. Now, instead of applying verse 21 to the final days of this age, we have to apply it to 2000 years ago since we had to change the 2nd coming to be meaning the 1st coming. Clearly, Amils, just like preterists do with the coming in the Discourse by changing it to mean the first coming rather than the 2nd coming, thus they can't be trusted to be honest with the texts , neither can Amils be trusted to be honest with the texts involved since they copycat what preterists do. Yet, the OP insists it has Indisputable proof that the Premillennial theory contradicts Scripture.
