22 major reasons to abandon the Premil doctrine

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Michiah-Imla

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2020
6,497
3,654
113
Northeast USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If not for the Protestant Reformation, nobody would have a Bible.

“Now the Church of Rome would seem at the length to bear a motherly affection towards her children, and to allow them the Scriptures in their mother tongue: but indeed it is a gift, not deserving to be called a gift, an unprofitable gift: they must first get a licence in writing before they may use them, and to get that, they must approve themselves to their Confessor, that is, to be such as are, if not frozen in the dregs, yet soured with the leaven of their superstition”

KJV translators to the readers
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
21,655
3,591
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If not for the Protestant Reformation, nobody would have a Bible.

Thankfully, the council of Trent was a failure.

Thank God for the Reformation.
WRONG.
The Protestant Revolt had absolutely nothing to do with declaring the Canon of Scripture.

As a matter of historical fact - your Protestant Fathers REMOVED 7 Books from the OT Canon along with portions of Daniel and Esther. based on the opinions of a FALSE Prophet named Rabbi Akiba ben Joseph (A.D. 37-137.

This is the SAME man who proclaimed that a man named Simon Bar Kokhba was the “real” Messiah during the 2nd Jewish Revolt (circa 132 AD).
Congratulations . . . .
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
21,655
3,591
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Still awaiting your defense of blasphemer Bellarmine. Remember him?

In English: “All names which in the scriptures are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that he is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” [Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, S.J. (Jesuit); Disputationes de Controversiis Christianae Fidei adversus hujus temporis Haereticos; Tom. 2, “Controversia Prima, De Conciliorum Auctoritate), Caput. 17, (1628 ed.) Vol. 1, pp. 266-translated] - https://www.documentacatholicaomnia...s_Robertus,_Opera_Omnia_(Vol_01_1856),_LT.pdf

In Latin: “Secundo probatur ratione, in Scripturis fundata; nam omnia nomina, quae in Scripturis tribuuntur Christo, unde constat eum esse supra Ecclesiam, eadem omnia tribuuntur Pontifici.” - http://cdigital.dgb.uanl.mx/la/1080015572_C/1080015573_T2/1080015573_21.pdf

'Disputationes de Controversiis Christianae" also mentioned in this book - https://www.documentacatholicaomnia...Sedes,_Acta_Apostolicae_Sedis_Vol_023,_LT.pdf

The link is directly provided.

The page is given as an image here:

Roman Catholicism - All names which in the scriptures are applied to Christ.jpg
And I'm still waiting for you to address how your OT Canon came into being.If you want to talk about Bellarmine - start another thrread.
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
6,393
2,726
113
73
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
WRONG.
The Protestant Revolt had absolutely nothing to do with declaring the Canon of Scripture.

As a matter of historical fact - your Protestant Fathers REMOVED 7 Books from the OT Canon along with portions of Daniel and Esther. based on the opinions of a FALSE Prophet named Rabbi Akiba ben Joseph (A.D. 37-137.

This is the SAME man who proclaimed that a man named Simon Bar Kokhba was the “real” Messiah during the 2nd Jewish Revolt (circa 132 AD).
Congratulations . . . .
A canon that the papal antichrist prohibited everyone from reading.

Thank God for the Reformation.
 

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
6,393
2,726
113
73
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
And I'm still waiting for you to address how your OT Canon came into being.If you want to talk about Bellarmine - start another thrread.
If you want to talk about OT canon, start another thread.

Thank God for the Reformation.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,794
4,469
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I know it’s difficult for a moral-relativist like yourself to understand but you’re either a Catholic, Orthodox or Protestant Christian.

Anything else is somethingbut it ain’t Christian
.
You keep talking about anything except for the fact that many of your Catholic doctrines contradict scripture. You're clearly trying to divert attention away from that fact. This other stuff you want to keep talking about is meaningless.

And, God forbid that you actually say anything relating to the topic of this thread. I know that is way too much to expect from you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee and WPM

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,794
4,469
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
And I'm still waiting for you to address how your OT Canon came into being.If you want to talk about Bellarmine - start another thrread.
LOL! Why don't YOU start another thread about all this nonsense? It has nothing to do with THIS thread. You are just a child.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPM

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,373
847
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
When did Peter EVER fall away and become a FALSE teacher??
Uh... What??? What in the world makes you ask such a question? Do you somehow think I insinuated such?

Sorry – but “Epignosis” makes them born-again believers. The warning is for those with Epoignosis of Christ – NOT for those who don’t realty believe but are “hanging around” with believers.
Well, again, I agree regarding the particular Greek word and it's true meaning, but your understanding of the entire passage is the issue. I was clear on that above, I think, so I'm not going to repeat myself.

Paul is saying the because he trusts that they have a true partnership in the Gospel – Jesus will carry on the work He began in them to completion - IF THEY REMAIN true partners in the Gospel. This is a CONDITON
Nope. Again... sorry, this is a copy/paste... what Peter is doing in this entire passage in 2 Peter 2 ~ singling out those who are with true followers for a time (added: in partnership with him, walking the same walk as he, in the Gospel)... and even suppose themselves to be fellow true followers, but then subsequently, again, go out from the true followers because they are not true followers, even proving themselves not to be of the true followers to the true followers themselves. So, not of them, not possessing the same God-given faith, which, as I'm sure you know, is the assurance from God the Father and the conviction of the Holy Spirit, which is what we read in Hebrews 11: 1, that "faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen."

Cooperation is not an inevitability...
Yes, I didn't say that. I said their Christian response is ~ their good works are ~ inevitable, because of God's work in them by His Spirit.
God does NOT coerce us. How gives us a FREE WILL.
Coersion. Ugh...

giphy.gif


Sorry, I mean that tongue-in-cheek... :)

Anyway, yes, I have known for a while now, from what you have said, that this is what is really behind your position, what is driving it. "Free will," as if anyone is suggesting we don't have it. Again though, I would answer that in Romans 9, Paul is ascribing this question to folks in a way unlike it would be ascribed to people thinking along the same lines as you, but it still applies:

"You will say to me then, 'Who can resist His will?' But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, 'Why have you made me like this?' Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?" (Romans 9:19-21)​

Let me point out something here, BOL. John says, in John 3:16, "whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life," and Paul says, in Romans 10:13, "everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved." Pretty simple, right? Well, there's a bit more to it than many suppose. Both John and Paul ~ not... Lennon or McCartney... and definitely not George or Ringo... :) ~ are referring directly to something the prophet Joel says in chapter 2 of his prophecy:

"And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved. For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall be those who escape, as the LORD has said, and among the survivors shall be those whom the LORD calls" (Joel 2:32)​

It should be noted that, while it is very true that everyone who calls on the name of the LORD will be saved, it is equally true that the ones calling upon the name of the LORD are the ones whom the LORD calls.

Consider what Jesus says in John 10:

"At that time the Feast of Dedication took place at Jerusalem. It was winter, and Jesus was walking in the temple, in the colonnade of Solomon. So the Jews gathered around Him and said to Him, 'How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly.' Jesus answered them, 'I told you, and you do not believe. The works that I do in my Father’s name bear witness about me, but you do not believe because you are not among my sheep. My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, and no one will snatch them out of My hand. My Father, Who has given them to Me, is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.'" (John 10:22-30, emphasis added)​

Regarding the blue text above, we should not reverse the order there. We are not among His sheep because we believe(d), but rather, we believe(d) BECAUSE we are His sheep, given to Him by the Father.

And regarding the green text above, there is no condition there. His sheep hear His voice, and He knows them, and they follow Him. He gives them eternal life ~ you and I have it ~ and no one is able to snatch them out of His or the Father's hand. And again, as Paul puts it:

"...we are more than conquerors through him who loved us... neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord." (Romans 8:37-39)​

The issue is the heart, BOL, not the will. Yes, of course we have free wills, but the heart drives the will. God is in the creation business... and the re-creation business :). So we sing, BOL, with David:

"Create in me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me." (Psalm 51:10)​

We, as Christians are reborn ~ recreated, as it were... we are new creations, which Paul actually says in a couple of places that immediately come to mind:

"Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come." (2 Corinthians 5:17)​

"For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation." (Galatians 6:15)​

We like to say ~ and are correct in saying ~ that He gives us a new heart, which is to say that, even though our old sinful nature is still with us in this life, we have been given a new nature, one that loves God and thus wants to serve Him. There is no "coersion." It would much more aptly be called an enabling. It's really a freeing ~ from slavery to unrighteousness, which is how Paul describes it:

"...(we) who were once slaves of sin have become obedient from the heart to the standard of teaching to which you were committed, and, having been set free from sin, have become slaves of righteousness.... (we) have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the fruit (we) get leads to sanctification and its end, eternal life" (Romans 6:15-23)

The ONLY way it can be an inevitability is IF we endure in faith by cooperating with His grace.
Jesus is the author and perfector of our faith, BreadOfLife. This is Hebrews 12:2. And as I said before... well, I'll say it in the words of a hymn we all know and love. This is not Scripture, but is firmly based in Scripture:

"'Tis grace hath brought me safe thus far, and grace shall lead me home." ~ (Amazing Grace, Sir John Newton)​

No – I said that our works are created by HIM. We are simply the tools that complete those works.
Well, right, I agree, but do you not believe what David said in Psalm 139? He sings:

"I praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are Your works; my soul knows it very well. My frame was not hidden from You, when I was being made in secret, intricately woven in the depths of the earth. Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in Your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them." (Psalm 139:14-16, emphasis added)​

If you are working on a project that needs a power drill – and the drill doesn’t work – then your project won’t get don’t.
Ah, well, to this... metaphor... I would say, BOL, that God provides the electricity. :) Or not, depending on His will. :) God's Holy Spirit is the electricity... :)

Grace and peace to you.
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
21,655
3,591
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
A canon that the papal antichrist prohibited everyone from reading.

Thank God for the Reformation.
Time for a History Lesson, Einstein . . .

For your information – the Printing press wasn’t invented until the 15th century.
Before than – Bibles were HANDWRITTEN and took YEARS to complete one. Because of this, they were very expensive and rare. Churches would CJAIN them to the pulpit.

Only very rich, educated people could afford to pay someone to copy a version for them. Unfortunately, because they were not linguists – there were usually MAY errors.

Up until the Middle Ages, MANY spurious, incorrect and outright heretical versions of Scripture made their way around. It might ALSO interest you to know that up to 75% of the public was functionally ILLITERATE – so only rich, educated people could read them anyway.

In the 13th century, the Church convened the Council of Toulouse. At this Council, it was ruled that in order to stop the spread of these false, unauthorized versions of the Bible from spreading – a prohibition was place on owning one. In any case – the Bible was read ALOUD from the pulpit on a daily basis and the public could hear virtually the ENTIRE Bible in a 3-year cycle.

After all – the Bible itself tells us that “faith comes from HEARING the Word of God” (Rom. 10:17).

So, next time - do your homework before making these linds of idiotic statements . . .
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
21,655
3,591
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
LOL! Why don't YOU start another thread about all this nonsense? It has nothing to do with THIS thread. You are just a child.
If you had bothered to actually read Bellarmine’s quote in CONTEXT, you would have realized TWO things:
1. He is speaking of the TITLES of Jesus that indicate his Authority over the Church.

2. He us NOT comparing the attributes of Jesus to the Pope.

Instead – you cherry-picked his quote – as ALL ignorant and dishonest anti=Catholics do.

Here’s one for ya, Einstein:
When you cherry-pick the Bible, it says that there is NO God.

When you read it in CONTEXT, it says that “The FOOL in his heart, ‘There is no God’ (Psalm 14:1).

CONTEXT
is
KEY.


NOW - how about telling me WHY you adhere to a 39-Book OT Canon instead of the 46-Book Canon Jesus and the NT Writers studied from and referenced almost 200 times in the NT?
 

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
8,554
4,201
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That's a historically-bankrupt claim.

It was indeed the Catholic Church that declared the Canon Scripture in
383AD.

Do YOU have another version of history?
The "Church" was long on the go before the Roman church corrupted the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: covenantee

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,794
4,469
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If you had bothered to actually read Bellarmine’s quote in CONTEXT, you would have realized TWO things:
1. He is speaking of the TITLES of Jesus that indicate his Authority over the Church.

2. He us NOT comparing the attributes of Jesus to the Pope.

Instead – you cherry-picked his quote – as ALL ignorant and dishonest anti=Catholics do.

Here’s one for ya, Einstein:
When you cherry-pick the Bible, it says that there is NO God.

When you read it in CONTEXT, it says that “The FOOL in his heart, ‘There is no God’ (Psalm 14:1).

CONTEXT
is
KEY.


NOW - how about telling me WHY you adhere to a 39-Book OT Canon instead of the 46-Book Canon Jesus and the NT Writers studied from and referenced almost 200 times in the NT?
Why are you saying this to me? Have you come completely unglued at this point? Have you completely lost your mind? I said NOTHING about Bellarmine and never gave any indication that I had any interest whatsoever in discussing him or his quotes.

What I said was "Why don't YOU start another thread about all this nonsense? It has nothing to do with THIS thread.".

What do you see there that gives you an impression that I had any interest in talking about Bellarmine?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WPM

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
21,655
3,591
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The "Church" was long on the go before the Roman church corrupted the truth.
The Catholic Church existed from the FIRST century.

FIRST century Bishop of Antioch, Ignatius, who was a lifelong student of the Apostle John wrote:
Ignatius of Antioch

Follow your bishop, every one of you, as obediently as Jesus Christ followed the Father. Obey your clergy too as you would the apostles; give your deacons the same reverence that you would to a command of God. Make sure that no step affecting the Church is ever taken by anyone without the bishop’s sanction. The sole Eucharist you should consider valid is one that is celebrated by the bishop himself, or by some person authorized by him. Where the bishop is to be seen, there let all his people be; just as, wherever Jesus Christ is present, there is the Catholic Church (Letter to the Smyrneans 8:2 [A.D. 110]).

And there is NOTHING you can do to change that . . .
 

BreadOfLife

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2017
21,655
3,591
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Why are you saying this to me? Have you come completely unglued at this point? Have you completely lost your mind? I said NOTHING about Bellarmine and never gave any indication that I had any interest whatsoever in discussing him or his quotes.

What I said was "Why don't YOU start another thread about all this nonsense? It has nothing to do with THIS thread.".

What do you see there that gives you an impression that I had any interest in talking about Bellarmine?
I mistook YOU for @[B]covenantee[/B] because you horned-in on our conversations.

Next time - mind your own business . . .
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,794
4,469
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I mistook YOU for @[B]covenantee[/B] because you horned-in on our conversations.
This shows yet again your lack of attention to detail. Which is why you can't be taken seriously.

Next time - mind your own business . . .
LOL!!! This is a public forum, genius. Anyone can reply to any post they want. Every other person here knows that, so why don't you, Einstein Junior? You are the one who couldn't mind his own business in the first place and started ranting about things that have nothing to do with the topic of this thread. LOL! You are a comedian. Tell me again how I should pay you for all the laughs you've given me? I can't get this many laughs for free, can I?
 
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: WPM and covenantee

covenantee

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2022
6,393
2,726
113
73
Canada
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
He us NOT comparing the attributes of Jesus to the Pope.
Of course he isn't comparing. Never did I say that he is.

Rather, he is ascribing the attributes of Jesus to the pope.

That's absolute blasphemy.

And no pope has ever repudiated it.
 

Illuminator

Well-Known Member
Jan 11, 2020
3,389
1,198
113
73
Hamilton
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Of course he isn't comparing. Never did I say that he is.

Rather, he is ascribing the attributes of Jesus to the pope.

That's absolute blasphemy.

And no pope has ever repudiated it.
You are reading into a quote what it doesn't say. No pope has ever claimed to be God, that indeed would be blasphemy. You can't expect any pope to repudiate a million lies conjured up by every hate cult that pops up, especially the made-in-America Bible clubs with sadomasocist anti-Catholic obsessions. You seem to want to be repeatedly spanked due to the number of times you've posted your nonsense. So your flavor of anti-Catholicism can best be described as a mental disorder so it's not your fault.

1684549850178.png

Scroll down this long list to the red heading that says,
POPE AS “GOD” OR “ANTICHRIST”
 

Attachments

  • 1684549991526.png
    1684549991526.png
    194.7 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.