David in NJ
Well-Known Member
You are describing yourself. More pettiness.
LORD JESUS Says: 1,000 literal years
pettiness = those who choose petty religion over Truth
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You are describing yourself. More pettiness.
Only in the New Covenant with Christ do we go to be with Him.Where I think you are struggling is in associating "ascension" exclusively with Christ's body. He also had a spirit that ascended to His Father upon death. This is what happens to us as believers upon death. When we die our spirits go to be with Jesus. When Jesus comes at the last trumpet our physical bodies experience the same.
Of course. Would you acknowledge that we sometimes grieve, quench and resist the Holy Spirit in our own volition in rebellion against what God wants from us? I would think you would acknowledge that. But, don't you believe that the conviction and chastisement from the Holy Spirit can also be resisted?We can all grieve, quench and resist the Holy Spirit. But that is not the end of the story. That is where conviction and chastisement kick in.
Who said it is literal? We are looking at the most symbolic book in the Bible? It does not even “one thousand years.” You force that into the text. It is the more figurative "a thousand."LORD JESUS Says: 1,000 literal years
pettiness = those who choose petty religion over Truth
You come out with this nonsense because you do not understand what Calvinists really believe. This is another strawman.Of course. Would you acknowledge that we sometimes grieve, quench and resist the Holy Spirit in our own volition in rebellion against what God wants from us? I would think you would acknowledge that. But, don't you believe that the conviction and chastisement from the Holy Spirit can also be resisted?
Look at this passage...
Revelation 3:14 And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; 15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. 16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. 17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: 18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. 19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.
Notice here that Jesus is telling the people in the church of the Laodiceans that He wishes they were cold or hot instead of lukewarm. These were true believers He was rebuking here because that is who He rebukes and corrects. This implies that they were lukewarm by their own choice that was in rebellion against what Jesus wanted from them, so He told them to "be zealous therefore, and repent" or else "I will spue thee out of my mouth".
Does this passage give you the impression that they had no responsibility to willingly choose to respond to His call for them to repent? Is there any indication here that they were certain to repent as Jesus was commanding them to do in order to avoid Him spewing them out of His mouth? Not at all. It was their responsibility to repent and no one, including God, was going to do it for them. It was their responsibility to heed Jesus's warning and choose to buy of Him gold tried in the fire. He was imploring them to stop thinking they were "in need of nothing" and start acknowledging that they needed Him and were nothing without Him.
How can you read a passage like this and think that God overrides our will and ensures that we will repent when this passage clearly indicates that God makes man responsible to choose whether to repent or not? Jesus was clearly indicating here that repentance is dependent on man's choice. If they chose to repent, He would not spew them out of His mouth. If they chose not to repent, He would spew them out of His mouth.
Who are you speaking to?Peter in Acts tells us Christ was in Hades
And Christ was raised on the Third Day, not the first day.
Peter says Christ's souls was not left in Hades, means God took Christ's soul from Hades when God resurrected Christ.
So Christ was in hades a couple of days after He died. This is even in the Apostle's creed
23 Him, being delivered by the determined purpose and foreknowledge of God, you [f]have taken by lawless hands, have crucified, and put to death; 24 whom God raised up, having [g]loosed the [h]pains of death, because it was not possible that He should be held by it. 25 For David says concerning Him:
‘I foresaw the Lord always before my face,
For He is at my right hand, that I may not be shaken.
26 Therefore my heart rejoiced, and my tongue was glad;
Moreover my flesh also will rest in hope.
27 For You will not leave my soul in Hades,
Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption.
28 You have made known to me the ways of life;
You will make me full of joy in Your presence.’
29 “Men and brethren, let me speak freely to you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. 30 Therefore, being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that of the fruit of his body, [i]according to the flesh, He would raise up the Christ to sit on his throne, 31 he, foreseeing this, spoke concerning the resurrection of the Christ, that His soul was not left in Hades, nor did His flesh see corruption. 32 This Jesus God has raised up, of which we are all witnesses. 33 Therefore being exalted [j]to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He poured out this which you now see and hear.
34 “For David did not ascend into the heavens, but he says himself:
How much do you think God cares for those whose names are not written in the book of life? It seems that, in Calvinism, He does not care about them at all because He does not even give them any opportunity to be saved. In my view He cared enough about them to send His Son to die for their sins and give them the opportunity at receiving eternal life that they willfully and stubbornly rejected.This is the heart of God. A God that cares. A God of compassion for those that wander.
You addressed none of them. You are continually making straw man arguments that do not address what I believe. You are arguing against a straw man Arminian who believes in works based salvation. I do not believe in works based salvation.I addressed several of your major points there. What did i miss?
Please do not preach Calvinism. Haha! I guess I'm only half kidding there. But, seriously, there's no rush, of course.I am preaching tonight. I am distracted a bit.
Ultimately the Divine choice has been made that is true.You come out with this nonsense because you do not understand what Calvinists really believe. This is another strawman.
You build your argument on sand: "I'm talking about no responsibility in salvation, not responsibility in general. I go there because it's true about Calvinists. That doctrine teaches that man has no responsibility to make a choice to repent or believe and instead the choice is entirely up to God."
I am not wasting any more time on this subject. You cannot even be fair and honest in regard to what I believe.
I hate to burst your bubble: they are in the Book from before the foundation of the world.How much do you think God cares for those whose names are not written in the book of life? It seems that, in Calvinism, He does not care about them at all because He does not even give them any opportunity to be saved. In my view He cared enough about them to send His Son to die for their sins and give them the opportunity at receiving eternal life that they willfully and stubbornly rejected.
As if you are not constantly misrepresenting my view? Is that a major sign if weakness in your arguments then?It is not true that Calvinism does not see that it's an ongoing spiritual battle for our souls. Where do you get that from? Who told you that? Why do you have to keep misrepresenting? That is a major sign of weakness in your argument.
What do you think they are resisting exactly when it comes to the Holy Spirit? I believe they are resisting the call to repentance that Jesus makes to all sinners.The damned can also grieve, quench and resist the conviction and chastisement of the Spirit.
This is nonsense and not taught anywhere in scripture. Nowhere does scripture teach that God offers salvation to anyone who is unable to accept it! That is ludicrous! The reality is that Calvinism gives people an excuse. Calvinism gives them the excuse that they just naturally reject the offer of salvation and are not able to accept it. What better excuse can someone have for not believing and not repenting than that?Men are without excuse. They willfully reject being rescued because that is their nature. They reject His offer of salvation because that is their nature.
- The outward call is to the whosoever – “many are called.”
- The internal call (effectual call) – “few are chosen.”
I never alleged works based salvation. I do not believe you (or most) Arminianists believe that. I am highlighting the unscriptural focus on man (that is totally unscriptural) and the attributing to him of qualities he does not possess. I find that disturbing.You addressed none of them. You are continually making straw man arguments that do not address what I believe. You are arguing against a straw man Arminian who believes in works based salvation. I do not believe in works based salvation.
Please do not preach Calvinism. Haha! I guess I'm only half kidding there. But, seriously, there's no rush, of course.
Why did you not address what I said? You can't be bothered to give your interpretation of the passage? You are making nothing but strawman arguments against what I believe, so look in the mirror when it comes to that.You come out with this nonsense because you do not understand what Calvinists really believe. This is another strawman.
Do you believe that man is responsible to choose whether to repent and believe or not? How can you honestly say you believe that? What kind of "choice" is it when they have two options and are only able to choose one of them? That's no choice at all.You build your argument on sand: "I'm talking about no responsibility in salvation, not responsibility in general. I go there because it's true about Calvinists. That doctrine teaches that man has no responsibility to make a choice to repent or believe and instead the choice is entirely up to God."
That is exactly how I feel about your arguments. You are not addressing what I believe, but rather what your strawman works-based salvation Arminian believes. I'm not wasting any more time on this subject, either, since, apparently, neither of us are able to even understand what the other believes for whatever reason.I am not wasting any more time on this subject. You cannot even be fair and honest in regard to what I believe.
Jesus does not pray for unbelievers, or the world.How much do you think God cares for those whose names are not written in the book of life? It seems that, in Calvinism, He does not care about them at all because He does not even give them any opportunity to be saved. In my view He cared enough about them to send His Son to die for their sins and give them the opportunity at receiving eternal life that they willfully and stubbornly rejected.
In your opinion. But you have shown how unscriptural your view is in every angle we have looked at. Your self-help, man-centered, He-loves-me-He-loves-me-not, gospel is contrary to the faithful character of God, eternal life and to His eternal truth. You have no assurance that you are going to make it - in your beliefs. It is all dependent on you doing A, B and C. So, yes, it is a good works gospel. You acknowledge God will not forsake you, but you argue that you could forsake Him and end up in hell. So, yes, it is all about you.As if you are not constantly misrepresenting my view? Is that a major sign if weakness in your arguments then?
Please spare me your denial of what Calvinism teaches. I'm not misrepresenting it at all. Calvinism does not believe in free will. Calvinism believes that the choice in salvation is entirely God's alone. Do you deny that? So, what spiritual battle are you talking about? I'm talking about a spiritual battle for our souls that is ongoing in real time with the victor over each soul not being predetermined by God.
What do you think they are resisting exactly when it comes to the Holy Spirit? I believe they are resisting the call to repentance that Jesus makes to all sinners.
This is nonsense and not taught anywhere in scripture. Nowhere does scripture teach that God offers salvation to anyone who is unable to accept it! That is ludicrous! The reality is that Calvinism gives people an excuse. Calvinism gives them the excuse that they just naturally reject the offer of salvation and are not able to accept it. What better excuse can someone have for not believing and not repenting than that?