Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Does premil know where David's literal physical throne is?
Does premil know where David's literal physical throne is?
I'm waiting for an omniscient premiller like you to tell me where David's literal physical throne is, the one that you say Jesus will sit in.
LOL. What a weak response. If God's Word supposedly teaches that Jesus will sit on David's literal, phsyical throne then you should be able to tell us where it is and show us pictures of it.
That proves NOTHING! Where is David's throne referenced there? NOWHERE. And you continue to ignore Peter's explanation for how Jesus was RAISED UP to David's throne when He was RAISED UP from the dead (Acts 2:29-36).
Right. I'm not finding his argument to be very convincing when, in this day and age, it should not be difficult to locate said throne if it still exists and provide some pictures. It seems that the evidence of the current existence of that throne is as legitimate as the evidence proving that aliens from outer space exist.I'm waiting for an omniscient premiller like you to tell me where David's literal physical throne is, the one that you say Jesus will sit in.
Go back and study that Matthew 19:28 verse by Lord Jesus Himself, and you will then understand, that is, IF... you heed it as written.I'm waiting for an omniscient premiller like you to tell me where David's literal physical throne is, the one that you say Jesus will sit in.
LOL. Your responses continue to get weaker and weaker. Maybe you should stop and step back and actually think about why you twist scriptures like Acts 2:29-36 to fit your doctrine and why believing what you want to believe is more important to you than just believing what scripture teaches.
Yes, we reject your false interpretations. So what? But, it's a lie to say we won't address it. I have addressed it multiple times. Show me again where that verse mentions David's throne? Oh yeah, it doesn't. Try again.
Total nonsense. Your many empty words mean nothing. Tell me again where David's literal throne is. And where can I go online to find some pictures of it?
Copy/paste Matthew 19:28 and highlight the root word "David" in it.
Yeah, I can't seem to find it, either, but maybe his vision is better than ours or we're not looking at the right translation or something? Let's see what he comes up with.Copy/paste Matthew 19:28 and highlight the root word "David" in it.
In red bold italics so I'll be sure not to miss it.
Again, it’s transparent you’re trying to avoid that Acts 2:29-36 can’t be interpreted properly by side-stepping passages like Matthew 25:31, 16:27, 19:28, 24:46-47, Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21, 11:18, 22:12, which exposes amill and postmill as fuel fit for the fire (1 Corinthians 3:13). To believe otherwise is foolish. The passages all verify that Acts 2:29-36 must be interpreted that Christ was raised to sit at his Father’s throne until his Father makes his Son’s enemies his footstool (Hebrews 10:12-13) and then Christ returns to rule on David’s throne, which is on earth and not in heaven,
Christ sent his disciples, the seed of Abraham, to “make disciples of all nations,” in Matthew 28:19. In so doing Christ fulfilled the promise that Abraham’s seed would be a blessing to “all the families of the earth.” Genesis 12:3 ESV. It’s post and amill that tries to change the meaning of Galatians 3:16-29.
As I affirmed, the scattering of the disciples when Christ was arrested only addresses one way the sheep were scattered. They were scattered all over the world when Christ told them, “Make disciples of all nations,” in Matthew 28:19. Furthermore, the OT prophesied the sheep would be scattered because of the rebellious pastors in passages like Jeremiah 23 and Ezekiel 34. The significance of the scattering is that it verifies Christ didn’t come to sit on David’s throne, insomuch as the Old and NT affirm he sits on his throne at the gathering of his sheep,
The point that there has been heresies from the beginning doesn’t vindicate post or amill.
It was Christ who said, the meek inherit the earth, not heaven, and Revelation maintains the saints rule on earth, not in heaven. So, it's your amill dogma that perverts Luke 17:20, not Premillennialism.
There is no difference, because David’s throne was on earth, not in heaven.Your references describe Jesus' throne at His Second Coming.
Acts 2:29-35 describes David's throne at Jesus' resurrection.
See the difference?
Nah.
The dead in Christ have to wait till Christ returns to receive their reward in reigning with Christ (Matthew 25:31, 16:27, 19:28, 24:46-47, Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27; and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21, 11:18, 22:12),
There's no difference between Jesus' resurrection and Jesus' Second Coming?There is no difference, because David’s throne was on earth, not in heaven.
Gibberish! His resurrection was to heaven, his return is to earth.There's no difference between Jesus' resurrection and Jesus' Second Coming?
The gibberish is yours. You said there was no difference.Gibberish! His resurrection was to heaven, his return is to earth.
I said his return is to earth to establish the gathering and his kingdom, which is upheld in the Old and New Testaments.The gibberish is yours. You said there was no difference.
He's been seated on David's thone in the heavens since His Resurrection. Acts 2:29-35I said his return is to earth to establish the gathering and his kingdom, which is upheld in the Old and New Testaments.
