Verily
Well-Known Member
Where do the verses I posted make it so that I do not somehow believe in John 1:1?WHY don't you believe John 1:1 View attachment 56810
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Where do the verses I posted make it so that I do not somehow believe in John 1:1?WHY don't you believe John 1:1 View attachment 56810
What makes you think I do not know this verse?
Where do the verses I posted make it so that I do not somehow believe in John 1:1?
John 1:1 proves Jesus is not a created being.... He is the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God
Where is this claim?You're the one that is claiming Jesus is a created being which is in opposition to John 1:1
Which verses that I posted is me accusing Jesus of being created?
Where did "I" say that?You keep saying he was "begotten" as in He was created....
Quote me specifically, I posted only verses, so which verse are you accusing of this that I posted?Read your own posts
Quote me specifically, I posted only verses, so which verse are you accusing of this that I posted?
In post #28 you said "he scripture tells us the day the Son was begotten"
John 1:1 says Jesus was from the beginning so whatever day you are speaking of is not when Jesus came in to existence.
The difference @David in NJ between you and me isn't much, but my belief cannot harmonious with the traditional Trinitarian concept as you believe it to be. And that difference is in the begotten nature of the Son. The Trinity as in the latter creeds which are accepted almost universally, defines the Son as being eternally begotten from all eternity, whereas i believe the Son was begotten at a certain point in eternity. Which means the Father/ Son paradigm for me is more closely related to how humans would normally believe a generational begetting would look like. God sent a Son. A real Son. Not a co equal eternal member who took on the role of son in order to demonstrate something we couldn't presumably understand otherwise.
Your statement places you on the doorsteps of watchtower/jw.Not a co equal eternal member who took on the role of son in order to demonstrate something we couldn't presumably understand otherwise.
You reject these references?
These are not speaking of his existance, its speaking of the day he was begotten
Will you reject John 1:1 that tells us Jesus is God's Word Who has existed since the beginning which proves He was NOT actually begotten on any particular day?
Your references do not prove Jesus has not existed from the beginning and has been with God and has been God... all along.
My references are the scriptures which show exactly the day he was begottenYour references are speaking of something other than Jesus being begotten on a particular day... AND your references do not prove Jesus is a created being either. View attachment 56841
Hang in there bud... you'll get it one of these days!... Maybe View attachment 56842
Why is it taking you this long to get this through your thick skull?The begotten you are speaking of is referring to someone being born like a child coming in to the world, so it's referring to Jesus coming back from the dead.
Which verses are false doctrine?I don't allow false doctrine in to my thinking...but you can all you want... feel free! View attachment 56848
Feel free to re-read what I've already posted... or not, I really don't care what you do or don't do.Which verses are false doctrine?
Stop being the false accuser and self impressed court jester that you are and man up. Point out which of the verses are incorrect concerning when Jesus Christ was begotten.
This should be easy for you, I only posted a handful and made the letters really big and bolded them for you.