David in NJ
Well-Known Member
My argument is with the Council of Nicaea, who proposed the Trinity Doctrine.
The plural form of God in Genesis -- elohim -- was borrowed from the Babylonians. Its usage in Genesis is NOT intended to indicate plurality. This often happens when a term is borrowed from another language and given a new meaning.
In this context, the term "word" or "logos" doesn't refer to a person. Here the apostle John recounts the creation to emphasize the idea that the origin of creation was a command. God spoke things into existence. The verbal pattern in Genesis chapter one includes the phrase: "And God said." No amount of force or power was required to bring creation into existence. God simply spoke and his will was done.
The Apostle indicates that God the Father is above all. In order for this to be true, and it is true, there can be no other. In other words, God the son is NOT the second person of an eternal Trinity. Paul declares that God the Father is above all, including Jesus.
The plural form of God in Genesis -- elohim -- was borrowed from the Babylonians. Its usage in Genesis is NOT intended to indicate plurality.
Dear @CadyandZoe,
How can you know Truth if you are looking to those who are lost and in the dark to find answers that can only be given to you from Above???
"Let Us make man in Our image according to Our likeness" = can you count to 3
When you believe a lie you turn off the Light.In this context, the term "word" or "logos" doesn't refer to a person.
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
He was with God in the beginning.
Through Him all things were made, and without Him nothing was made that has been made.
In Him was life, and that life was the light of men. The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
The Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us.
We have seen His glory, the glory of the one and the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
Last edited: