Wick Stick
Well-Known Member
I think I explained previously, but I was probably obtuse, delving into concordances and Greek and whatnot.St. SteVen said:
It was in reference to the BOOKS of the Law and/or the BOOKS of the Prophets. Not the laws themselves. IMHO
Most readers use Matthew 5:17 to claim that Jesus didn't come to abolish/destroy the law. (small l)
They stop short of the full statement and its significance. It doesn't say "the law." (full stop)
It says the Law or the Prophets. (capital L and P) Meaning the books,
or more importantly the prophecies about Christ in those books.
How do you abolish/destroy a prophet anyway?
It's about binding and loosing. You abolish a law by loosing the people from their obligation to perform it. You can also loose the people from the commands of the prophets, because the prophets speak with authority. So...
Were the people bound by The Law? Were they bound to do what The Prophets said? Yes they were. And Jesus began his sermon about the law by saying, "I didn't come to un-bind you. I'm adding more."