Understood.I don't want to address this because everyone has an opinion, which will invite lots of discussion, and I'm trying to have a different discussion.
But I was just defining the terms.
But let's not derail....
:)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Understood.I don't want to address this because everyone has an opinion, which will invite lots of discussion, and I'm trying to have a different discussion.
Their "ideas" were held by no one in the early church--that's why they can't prove their beliefs from Scripture, as evinced in this thread.But you say that two readers will come away with two different ideas.
What do you mean by "observance of the Mosaic Law"?The misunderstandings regarding works
For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from works
This is not what the scriptures say but it is what a lot of people remember and it is how they apply Christianity to their lives and to the Commandment that we should love one another, as well as the responsibilities of Christians ….Which is why some are resistant to my motto to Be good and do good.
The scripture actually says…
For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. Romans 3:18
This scripture is actually referring to the observance of the Mosaic Law. And this leads to a curse for Christians that try…..but that is another topic. But again, This scripture is actually referring to the observance of the Mosaic Law
What do you mean by "observance of the Mosaic Law"?
GPTheir "ideas" were held by no one in the early church--that's why they can't prove their beliefs from Scripture, as evinced in this thread.
This is partially true. But when people say works we do nto always think of the law.Generally when the words works is mentioned it means obeying the Mosaic Law and the Mosaic law will not save you and in fact can curse a Christian.
You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace" Galatians 5:4
What IS the reward EG?This is partially true. But when people say works we do nto always think of the law.
Again, You work for a reward. or you work out of appreciation.
Salvation is a gift not a reward..
NoWhat IS the reward EG?
Could it be heaven?
if you have to safeguard it, it is not a gift is it. I call that a down payment. Ie, I give it to you for free, But you have to work to keep it.Salvation is a gift.
It's up to the individual to safeguard it.
Once again you talking about what we do after we are saved. Not what we do to be saved.Hebrews 10:35-36
35Therefore, do not throw away your confidence, which has a great reward.
36For you have need of endurance, so that when you have done the will of God, you may receive what was promised.
Cross references for above:
Mark 3:35
For whoever does the will of God is My brother and sister and mother."
Luke 21:19
By your patient endurance you will gain your souls.
Romans 2:7
To those who by perseverance in doing good seek glory, honor, and immortality, He will give eternal life.
Hebrews 9:15
Therefore Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, now that He has died to redeem them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant.
Hebrews 12:1
Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off every encumbrance and the sin that so easily entangles, and let us run with endurance the race set out for us.
Yes. It's always US doing the good works which are required by God.
OK EG.No
heaven is a gift. We all deserve hell.. we could never deserve heaven
if you have to safeguard it, it is not a gift is it. I call that a down payment. Ie, I give it to you for free, But you have to work to keep it.
Once again you talking about what we do after we are saved. Not what we do to be saved.
Salvation is a gift. It can never be earned, We need not be fools thinking we perfect what God started in us in the flesh (works)
There is a way to be unitedOK EG.
You know I'm not going to go on forever.
I'd just like to make my comments when I read something off.
I've received gifts--- I safeguard them.
But OK, enough of this.
I believe you're a good person and Christian but I really dislike how you explain salvation and good works.
There are some reading along that don't even understand what's being said.
I wish we were more united in our language - besides our theology.
Some who are saved don't feel like they have to do anything....There is a way to be united
We are saved BY GRACE through faith, not of works
Those who are saved WILL work (not might) because they were created anew for good works
The problem is people who push works usually push a legalistic mindset. For those of us in christ. We do nto have t push woris they flow out of our new birth.
Well true believers do not believe this. They know god will complete the work in themSome who are saved don't feel like they have to do anything....
See again you show lack of trust or faith in God. God will change their lives. Stop painting to self and point up. He will (not might) change youINCLUDING experiencing a transformation in their lives.
Nope. I do not think this at all. I have faith in God and I have seen his work. Maybe you have not that’s why you doubt?Maybe you haven't come across anyone like this.
They think that because they walked down an isle and "accepted" Jesus all if just fine now.
I never said it was. Stop assuming you know what I thinkTHIS IS NOT TRUE.
Do what?Now, you may say that they're not truly saved and you'd be right...
Well. They will not find truth with your holier than though phariseeism. You can only show them damnation God came to save them. I will not stop him like you areBUT
They think they are because of reading stuff like what you say.
To be saved? They would be correct. If they could do something the cross was meaningless. But that’s for showing your true colors. I did get you right. You almost had me convinced you believed in graceThey feel that Jesus did it all and they have nothing left to do.
Have no idea what this even meansThey think that IF the Holy Spirit works a miracle and calls them to do something, then maybe they'll do it.
You can scream all you wantThis is the bottom line and I'll repeat again:
FAITH WITHOUT WORKS IS DEAD.
WORKS WITHOUT FAITH ARE DEAD.
One REQUIRES/NECESSITATES the other.
That’s a bogus question. The only way you can truly obey god in a means to justify yourself you would have to start from birth and never sin until you doIf you can reply NO to the following question, which you've never answered BTW, then there's something lacking in understanding the NT.
IS IT NECESSARY TO OBEY GOD?
lol. The Catholic Church the oldest organized church on earth have not got it rightDid you see my post 545 to another member?
Do you realize how many Christian theologians you put aside with your language?
Asking if it's necessary to OBEY GOD is a bogus question?Well true believers do not believe this. They know god will complete the work in them
But hey if you think you can add your works to grace feel free. Good luck with that
See again you show lack of trust or faith in God. God will change their lives. Stop painting to self and point up. He will (not might) change you
Nope. I do not think this at all. I have faith in God and I have seen his work. Maybe you have not that’s why you doubt?
I never said it was. Stop assuming you know what I think
Do what?
Well. They will not find truth with your holier than though phariseeism. You can only show them damnation God came to save them. I will not stop him like you are
To be saved? They would be correct. If they could do something the cross was meaningless. But that’s for showing your true colors. I did get you right. You almost had me convinced you believed in grace
Have no idea what this even means
You can scream all you want
We are saved by grace through faith not of works lest anyone should boast
You want to boast. Have fun
Those who are truly saved WILL work and praise God like I do
That’s a bogus question. The only way you can truly obey god in a means to justify yourself you would have to start from birth and never sin until you do
You failed as did I
As for obeying the gospel. This is a must will you obey the gospel? I am worried you have not
lol. The Catholic Church the oldest organized church on earth have not got it right
You want to follow Men feel free. They will take you down with them and could care less
False teachers were present even in the 1st generation, so I'm not saying "Whatever the Early Church says is immutable", but isn't it interesting that none of them interpreted Scripture in such a way as to arrive at Monergism or general eternal Security?GP
I feel the the Early Church Fathers is a very important group of persons since they were taught by the Apostles.
Jesus' statements concerning abiding should be understood as descriptive, not prescriptive. To illustrate, consider the statement, 'If an apple falls from the tree, it will land on the ground.' This is not a command for the apple to fall, but a description of what will happen if certain conditions are met. Similarly, Jesus' statements about abiding describe the natural outcome of certain conditions being met.The branches, disciples, are told to abide--and, if not, they don't receive substance from the Vine, Jesus (the Spirit, eternal life, is in Jesus (1 Jn 3:23,24, 5:11)), so they don't bear fruit, and will eventually be thrown in the fire, and "'My Righteous one will live by faith, but if [My righteous one] shrinks back, My soul has no pleasure in [My Righteous one]'... unto destruction." (Heb 10:38,39).
The children are disciples, branches, being told that if they don't abide they will not bear fruit and will be thrown in the fire--they will shrink back in shame and be destroyed, as Hebrews 10 says.
Nope, the command to "remain" is repeated to the spiritually immature disciples, branches, the "children".Jesus' statements concerning abiding should be understood as descriptive, not prescriptive. To illustrate, consider the statement, 'If an apple falls from the tree, it will land on the ground.' This is not a command for the apple to fall, but a description of what will happen if certain conditions are met.
Yeah, "if you keep God's commands".Similarly, Jesus' statements about abiding describe the natural outcome of certain conditions being met.
Nope, that verse says God is glorified when you bear much fruit by your remaining in the Vine as God prunes you. Pruning removes unnecessary growth that sucks up resources that could otherwise be used to bear fruit. Pruning improves yield. His skillful knowledge shows the masterfulness of the vinedresser. It glorifies the vinedresser.According to Jesus, the abiding of a person is made possible by God the Father. (John 15:8) He tells the Eleven, 'My Father is glorified by this, that you bear much fruit, and so prove to be My disciples.' This reassures us that our abiding is not solely dependent on our own strength of character, but on the grace and enabling power of God the Father.
No, rather, the life is in the Son, and those who remain in the Son by keeping God's Command remain eligible to receive the Spirit that is in the Son (the substance in the Vine), like Paul says, "Whoever disregards this [prohibition against immorality] disregards not man but God Who gives you His Spirit", just as David, after committing sexual immorality with Bathsheba, cried, "Don't take Your Spirit away from me!" It's so clear.There remains a direct correlation between the indwelling of the Spirit and being raised from the dead. For this reason, since those who abide in Christ will receive eternal life, then those who remain are those who have been granted the Spirit of God.
I still need to understand how this follows from the previous discussion. You lost me with your comment about Apollos, which isn't related to the discussion at all. You also lost me with your typology comment, which isn't a valid means of interpretation.So, just because we're saved from slavery to sin doesn't mean we can't sin.
Romans 7 presents two distinct arguments. In the first argument, Paul compares the Law concerning marriage to a Jewish person's change of strategy regarding their attainment of God's favor. He argues that since it can be shown that the Law is not a viable means to gain God's favor, this is like the death of the husband. Just as the wife of a deceased husband is free to seek another husband, the Jewish person living under the Law is free to seek another way outside the Law to be justified and to attain God's favor, namely, faith in Jesus Christ.Romans 7 described the life of a Jew in the flesh and under the Law.
I don't understand your explanation and I'm not sure what I said that would lead you to say this.So, before, "oh, no, these 'children' are not believers at all", but, now, after I proved they were believers, "oh, no, just because they're told to do something doesn't mean they have a choice"--you really are funny.
Indeed, two individuals, both reading the same text, might understand it differently because each person brings baggage to the text. We all carry around a set of presuppositions that inform our understanding of a text. With discipline and hard work, we can learn to overcome that limitation and learn how to allow the text to teach us instead.Nice ideas C....
But you say that two readers will come away with two different ideas.
No. The New Testament is true in everything that it says. But when two people disagree about what it says, this indicates that one or both of them have not yet understood it the way it was intended.So are you saying that the NT does NOT CONTAIN THE TRUTH?
Yes. Thanks for the help. :)Do you believe that, perhaps, one of the readers is incorrect in their interpretation of scripture?
1. Ro 7 shows a man was "without strength" getting pummeled by sin, bc it overpowered him qnd made him act sins contrary to the law of his mindI still need to understand how this follows from the previous discussion. You lost me with your comment about Apollos, which isn't related to the discussion at all. You also lost me with your typology comment, which isn't a valid means of interpretation.
No, he says he serves God's Law with his inner man, but Sin's law with his flesh, thus those who walk according to the spirit will not fulfill Sin's law--but if you walk according to the flesh you will die because sin leads to death.My point was centered on Paul's assertion in Romans 8, where he says that those in Christ are freed from the Law of Sin and Death, indicating that sin is no longer an issue.
They were obligated as long as they lived to serve by Torah, but, since they died with Christ, they are freed from their obligation. This is an ancient Jewish teaching also found in the TalmudRomans 7 presents two distinct arguments. In the first argument, Paul compares the Law concerning marriage to a Jewish person's change of strategy regarding their attainment of God's favor. He argues that since it can be shown that the Law is not a viable means to gain God's favor, this is like the death of the husband. Just as the wife of a deceased husband is free to seek another husband, the Jewish person living under the Law is free to seek another way outside the Law to be justified and to attain God's favor, namely, faith in Jesus Christ.
Yeah, he calls it "slavery"--and after we are rescued from "slavery" by the blood of "our Passover Lamb", we are not "forced" to sin, but we have a choice.The second argument proves that a Jewish person can never find justification under the law since no one, whether Jew or Gentile, can obey the 10th commandment. He obeys that commandment in his mind, he agrees with the commandment and he wants to obey the commandment, but upon introspection, he finds that he breaks the commandment often. He finds sin in him, at the core of his being and he struggles against his own members.