Not within the 70 weeks.
After the 70 weeks. Gabriel ended at the end of 69 weeks.
After the 69th week the Messiah was cut off, not within those 69 weeks, but after.
There was plenty of time for those 70 weeks to end. But the 70th week only ends at the 7th Trumpet. That is when time is declared finished for those 70 weeks.
Sin is still present. Everlasting righteousness does not reign currently. Those are attributes of the Day of the Lord you deny will happen. Your view states the Day of the Lord started at the Cross, and ends at the Second Coming. Yet you have sin in your Day of the Lord, and the lack of everlasting righteousness. Mostly because you end the 70th week without Israel enjoying that fruit of completion.
No one is denying Jesus did not fully obey God. That is only part of Daniel 9. The other part is the Prince to come. The Second Coming of King Jesus. That is as much a part of Daniel 9 as the Messiah part. No throne of Jesus was ever set up in Jerusalem equal to the Cross of the Messiah.
Jesus as Christ and King will fulfill that point for Israel. The fulness of the Gentiles is not the fulfillment of Daniel 9:24-27. The 7th Trumpet is that fulfillment, and the 1,000 year reign of Christ is between the Second Coming and the end. Between the 7th Trumpet and Jesus handing back creation to God.
John points out that time is up for those 70 weeks in Revelation 10. Revelation being the revealing of Jesus as King. Then when the 7th Trumpet begins we do see:
"And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever."
This was not a point of time in the first century. This is the point in time, like the Cross, where Jesus as King was obedient in taking over the authority of all earthly kingdoms, after an earthly ministry. This earthly ministry only happens after the Second Coming, and Jesus is physically on earth.
According to you, but, not according to the Bible.
(1) The first part (7 weeks) relates to the rebuilding of Jerusalem. The angel said of the first aspect relating to the rebuilding of Jerusalem, in the first seven weeks, “the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.”
(2) The second part (62 weeks) takes up to the beginning of Christ’s earthly ministry.
(3) The third part (1 week) commences with the start of Christ’s earthly ministry and sees the crucifixion half way through it (3 ½ yrs). The other 3 ½ yrs saw the Church receive its baptism of fire at Pentecost and enter into the fulfilment of advancing the Gospel – the nations now being open to the Gospel, unlike before.
The question the futurists must answer is: is there any division in time between the 7th and 8th weeks?
The answer, of course, is a categorical NO!
Then, what scriptural warrant is there for, in unprecedented manner, decapitating this harmonious cohesive Messianic prophecy, aimlessly and indefinitely projecting the final week 2000 years+ into the unknown to a supposed end-time 7-year period, when it was perfectly fulfilled in the life and time of our Lord’s ministry, especially when there is absolutely NO corroborated in the New Testament for this 70th week gap-theory. As we have already stated, probably, the most distasteful aspect of this corrupt teaching is how they corruptly attribute it to anti-Christ at the end when it explicitly relates to Christ and His atonement 2000 years ago? To be honest, with this form of hermeneutics you could potentially corrupt any Old Testament passage and apply it to whatever time-period or matter one wishes.
The text does not in any way demand a gap; the Futurists unilaterally (without any scriptural warrant and for his own reason) chooses to insert one there in order to support his unsound theology. Those who do or condone such are unquestionably gap-theorists.
The text does demand – “Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to (1) finish the transgression, and to (2) make an end of sins, and to (3) make reconciliation for iniquity, and to (4) bring in everlasting righteousness, and to (5) seal up the vision and prophecy, and to (6) anoint the most Holy” (Daniel 9:24).
These 6 elements must therefore be fulfilled (1) in Messiah, and (2) must come mid-way through the final week. The desolation is not within the 70 weeks, it is the visible result of the fulfilment of numbers 1-6 in the midst of the week i.e. the rendering of the temple’s former use obsolete.
What is the greater abomination, rejecting the once all-sufficient sacrifice of Calvary, as the Jews evidently did (and are doing), or abolishing or rejecting any idolatrous animal sacrifices in an imaginary temple? The Pretrib scenario is fanciful anyway as the temple has been (and is being) built – Christ’s body.
The “overspreading of abominations” was the rebellious idolatrous continuing of the temple sacrifices by the Jews after they were abolished at Calvary (1/2 way through the final week). And despite God allowing them time to repent in the intervening 40-year period (AD 30-AD 70), they stubbornly rebelled. The blasphemous continuing of the old order – the abolished (imperfect) sacrifices – occasioned the destruction of the temple – 40 being a perfect probationary period. When the practicing of the temple sacrifices had reached their allotted time-span, God destroyed them and the temple.
Amill has glorification for the dead and alive in Christ at his second coming. 
