It's a link to a book. Have you ever read it?
No. I have thee Book.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It's a link to a book. Have you ever read it?
Does it agree with the historical true Church that Christ has fulfilled Daniel 9:24?It's a link to a book. Have you ever read it?
Daniel 9:2 says: “In the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years, whereof the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem. And I set my face unto the Lord God, to seek by prayer and supplication, with fasting, and sackcloth, and ashes.”
Are these seventy years linear, congruent and sequential?
Yes, The Coming Prince, by Sir Robert Anderson, published 1895. I have it and read it. Seriously flawed. For example his 360-day-year begins on Nisan 1st, BC 445. But Nehemiah does not mention the day. Also the year is wrong.My teachers weren't online. I guess you never read The Coming Prince? The Coming Prince: The Marvelous Prophecy of Daniel's Seventy Weeks Concerning the Antichrist https://a.co/d/3GxRkJf
I'm am not sure what you are expecting. Messiah is cut after 69 weeks just like it says. As for the arrival of the Messiah, He arrives a specified time after the decree to rebuild Jerusalem.
Here is an online version.No. I have thee Book.
The last time I looked the wrong decree was used to arrive at the date of the arrival of the Messiah by those you are following. Additionally, the last time I looked Luke 3 proves that it would be impossible for the Messiah to have arrived in 27 AD as your teacher declare, because the 15th year of Tiberius Caesar is 29 AD. The dates you are using are proven to be incorrect. You can deny the facts and roll on in blindness or you can do your homework and study to show thyself approved.The last time I looked at it: 69 1/2 weeks was after 69. Hello! Think about it before you post. You have not addressed the multiple contradictions that accompany the new doctrine you are running with that was invented by the Jesuits.
Your illustration is ridiculous. Like Pretrib, it doesn't make sense.
Interesting. 70 years in the desolations of Jerusalem. Messiah is cut off after 69 weeks. Then in Matthew 24 we see the future destruction of Jerusalem which we can verify in Revelation 12 when the woman is told to flee to a place of protection for a time, times and half a time.
Messiah is cut after 69 weeks. I'm pretty sure that has been said as it is in the text.I was expecting you to acknowledge the fact that he arrives as recognized Messiah AFTER 69 weeks. You cannot seem to bring yourself to do this.
25 So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks;
Once you acknowledge this your next step is to figure out how long it took for his death to occur for atonement to find the cut off point.
Heb 9
15 For this reason He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that, since a death has taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were committed under the first covenant, those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.
Interesting. 70 years in the desolations of Jerusalem. Messiah is cut off after 69 weeks. Then in Matthew 24 we see the future destruction of Jerusalem which we can verify in Revelation 12 when the woman is told to flee to a place of protection for a time, times and half a time.
So is this....,Messiah is cut after 69 weeks. I'm pretty sure that has been said as it is in the text.
No such thing as a pre-trib rapture found in scripture, it's the make believe brain child of John N. Darby 1830's and made popular in the Scofield reference Bible of 1909Daniel 9:20-27
1 Thessalonians 4:13-18
1 Thessalonians 5:9
Revelation 3:10
The rapture of the church is the event in which God “snatches away” all believers from the earth in order to make way for His righteous judgment to be poured out on the earth during the tribulation period. The rapture is described primarily in 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18 and 1 Corinthians 15:50–54. God will resurrect all believers who have died, give them glorified bodies, and take them from the earth, along with all living believers, who will also be given glorified bodies at that time. “For the Lord Himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever” (1 Thessalonians 4:16–17).
The rapture will involve an instantaneous transformation of our bodies to fit us for eternity. “We know that when he [Christ] appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is” (1 John 3:2). The rapture is to be distinguished from the second coming. At the rapture, the Lord comes “in the clouds” to meet us “in the air” (1 Thessalonians 4:17). At the second coming, the Lord descends all the way to the earth to stand on the Mount of Olives, resulting in a great earthquake followed by a defeat of God’s enemies (Zechariah 14:3–4).
Here.Instead of running your mouth off and continually ignoring simple questions: can you give me another example in Scripture of such a decapitation of a harmonious time-period - like where God says 7 days and He didn't mean a linear, congruent and sequential 7 days, or 7 years and He didn't mean a linear, congruent and sequential 7 years, or 70 years and He didn't mean a linear, congruent and sequential 70 years? Anything?
Daniel's AOD is future, and the bad guy causing the Abomination and Desolation will be present on earth to the "Consummation" Ultimate EndIt is 100% true. It is your interpretation that is messed up. This is a classic example of manipulating Scripture to fit your doctrine. Clearly, both the method and the doctrine are wrong, thus the conclusion is wrong. William E Cox says in his book Biblical Studies in Final Things: “the futurist arbitrarily places a gap between the sixty-nine and seventieth weeks of Daniels’ prophecy. He does this without one verse of Scripture or one iota of historical data to back up his argument.”
History shows that the 490 years were linear, congruent and sequential. Those of us that take 490 years to mean exactly that do not have to prove that it is harmonious; we just have to accept what it states. We take it literally (1) because it happened literally, (2) there is no command to decapitate it and project it into the unknown. Seven multiplied by seventy comes to 490 cohesive unitary years, not 2,500 broken up years and counting. The clincher is: there is no gap mentioned in the prophecy so there is no need or warrant to insert one in there.
Let’s use an illustration. If you were directed to go to the next state and told and told it was exactly a 490-mile journey (right down to the very yard). You were told that in-between the starting point and your destination you would pass two important landmarks, the first after 49 miles, which was accurate to the very yard. The next was a further 434 miles ahead (bringing your journey to 483 miles in total), which also occurred right down to the very yard. The journey's end would be a final 7 miles down the road from your second landmark, making your total journey 490 miles. Exactly half way between 483 miles and 490 (486 ½ miles) you would witness a monumental landmark that would surpass anything you have ever seen. How would you then feel if you were told when you hit the second landmark that your final location was still a possible 2,000+ miles down the road with NO exact finishing point? Such an idea would be totally unthinkable in the natural, but unprecedented in God's economy. God always fulfils His promises.
Are you claiming the Greek scholar Strong below is wrong and your right?Mystery Babylon is described as a harlot and as "she" and "her", so I guess he must believe that Mystery Babylon is a literal woman then? If he used his flawed logic consistently, that is what he would have to believe.
Less than a weekSo is this....,
25 So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks;
How long did it take before he gave his life after the 69th week.
You're not going to answer so I'll say goodbye now.
You, WPM, Jeff, and Covenantee,run around as the reformed preterist tag team, yes you guys correctly believe there is no future Millennium, but your out in left field denying a future AOD, Great Tribulation, and a future literal human man as Daniel's (Little Horn) Paul's (Man Of Sin), John's (The Beast)LOL. You are incapable of refuting his belief (which I share). That is obvious to me. I find most of your arguments to be very incoherent.
You, WPM, Jeff, and Covenantee,run around as the reformed preterist tag team, yes you guys correctly believe there is no future Millennium, but your out in left field denying a future AOD, Great Tribulation, and a future literal human man as Daniel's (Little Horn) Paul's (Man Of Sin, John's (The Beast)
Daniel's (Little Horn), Paul's (Man Of Sin), And John's (The Beast) A Literal Human Man,, That Will Be Present On This Earth At The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
The figure mentioned above will be a "Future" literal human man, and he will be present on earth in a living human body to witness the "Future" second coming and final judgment as scripture clearly teaches below
Daniel's (Little Horn) Present On Earth At The Second Coming
Daniel 7:8-11KJV
8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.
9 I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
10 A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened.
11 I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame.
Paul's (Man Of Sin) Present On Earth At The Second Coming
2 Thessalonians 2:3-8KJV
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
John's (The Beast) Present On Earth At The Second Coming
Revelation 19:19-20KJV
19 And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
I bet the Pharisee's thought Jesus was a broken record, they hated his presented truth
Thankyou.Less than a week