kcnalp
Well-Known Member
So you deny that Jesus is God and Hell fire is eternal?Oh dear...another attempt at fudge!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So you deny that Jesus is God and Hell fire is eternal?Oh dear...another attempt at fudge!
A theophany is a physical manifestation of God in an human form. The angel of the Lord appeared for the purpose of man to see an image, since God is invisible and so God himself spoke through this manifestation as in the burning bush as in other visitations as well.Putting Michael aside, I was reading Judges 2, which says an angel led the people out of Egypt. Is this angel also God?
A theophany is a physical manifestation of God in an human form. The angel of the Lord appeared for the purpose of man to see an image, since God is invisible and so God himself spoke through this manifestation as in the burning bush as in other visitations as well.
Don't agree with me when you don't understand what I am saying.Exactly. Angels and prophets speak the words of God, even using the 1st person, but are not God. It gets confusing sometimes.
"And the Lord went before them by day in a pillar of cloud to lead the way, and by night in a pillar of fire to give them light, so as to go by day and night." ExodusRegarding the burning bush, I was wondering about the pillar of cloud during the day and fire at night the led the Hebrews out of Israel. Was that also a theophany but not God himself?
Don't agree with me when you don't understand what I am saying.
Exactly. Angels and prophets speak the words of God, even using the 1st person, but are not God. It gets confusing sometimes.
A theophany or Christophany is not the same as an angel, like Michael or Gabriel. A visitation by an angel, of which there may be several hundred million btw, is not the same as a visitation by the Lord Himself, manifesting himself in appearance as an angel. The differentiation is in the phrase, "angel of the Lord".
I'm sure there are very good reasons it's not in the Bible.
I agree with you that angels and prophets spoke God's word, but that was not what I was trying to convey.You do make it hard to agree with you.
Based on my quote above ...
... I have no idea how what you wrote relates to my post above. It's like you are being pendantic about theophany. How about if you respond to my point, how Judges 2 is an example of Angels and prophets speak the words of God, even using the 1st person, but are not God. It gets confusing sometimes.
I agree with you that angels and prophets spoke God's word, but that was not what I was trying to convey.
I'll stick with the Christian Bible.I'll agree with ya that there are "reasons."
Yet, I'll disagree as to the reasons being very good! Very Acceptable, or "agreeably consensual" in an "eyes half open" (normal, so as avoid too much controversy) apostisetic "man church" sorta way. Led by blind, or willingly blind shepherds into a/the ditch. Which never gets to this point for the sake of the God and Father of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, for those who faithfully(?) assemble!
1 John 2:27
But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
Not if the Archangel is not an angel at all. No, we can't all just agree. I realize ecumenism is the order of the day, but we can't all be one on some of these and other finer points, and even some of the (much) larger issues. There will always be a small number who will follow the Lamb whithersoever He goeth, according to the dictates of their consciences, and regardless of popular opinion. Remember you heard this on this day: All who live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution, whether it be mild and verbal, as is done here, or severely with pseudo-righteous indignation. :)Can we all agree Jesus is not, not ever could he be, Michael the Archangel?
Wouldn't that be a kind of demotion? For the messiah who as Jesus,Immanuel, was God incarnate.
How would a person who doesn't understand you know that he doesn't and therefore should not agree with you? How absurdDon't agree with me when you don't understand what I am saying.
And here we go...So you deny that Jesus is God and Hell fire is eternal?
"Not if the Archangel is not an angel at all."Not if the Archangel is not an angel at all. No, we can't all just agree. I realize ecumenism is the order of the day, but we can't all be one on some of these and other finer points, and even some of the (much) larger issues. There will always be a small number who will follow the Lamb whithersoever He goeth, according to the dictates of their consciences, and regardless of popular opinion. Remember you heard this on this day: All who live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution, whether it be mild and verbal, as is done here, or severely with pseudo-righteous indignation. :)
Ye men of Israel, take heed to yourselves what ye intend to do as touching these men. For before these days rose up Theudas, boasting himself to be somebody; to whom a number of men, about four hundred, joined themselves: who was slain; and all, as many as obeyed him, were scattered, and brought to nought. After this man rose up Judas of Galilee in the days of the taxing, and drew away much people after him: he also perished; and all, even as many as obeyed him, were dispersed. And now I say unto you, Refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought: But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God.
(Acts 5:35-39)
It's all been expounded earlier in the thread."Not if the Archangel is not an angel at all."
What in scripture would lead one to believe that?
I recall some believing Archangel Michael is actually Jesus. But that doesn't hold to scripture.It's all been expounded earlier in the thread.
Whom did you quote?And here we go...
"You don't agree with me; therefore you don't believe God is God and the Bible is the inspired word of God."
It's kind of a sickness with you, isn't it?
The Truth According To kcnalp
If we are willing to trade pride for love.Can't we disagree with one another without throwing barbs at one another?![]()
While I am on the subject, think of this theophany if you saw this image and heard God speak. Wouldn't one look at his face and think, this what God looks like, what He sounds like, His face would be imprinted in your mind. But then if Gabriel visited you, he looks and sounds different, wouldn't you get confused? Or if anytime any angel appeared to someone, they may now down thinking it was God. The angel would correct this person if they bowed down to him. Yet with an actually visitation from The Lord, He would say, TAKE OFF YOU SANDALS, YOU ARE ON HOLY GROUND. And The LORD would receive worship.
You are right, He is not. The angel of the Lord is a manifestation not of Him, just of an angel for us to seeIt is what I am trying to convey.
(I'm not sure I'm buying into the idea that God is manifesting Himself as an angel.)