No. I'm saying defending the Bible IS an apology. Did you not read the definition?
An apology, a defense is different from being argumentative. Again from Merriam
ar·gu·men·ta·tive
ˌär-gyə-ˈmen-tə-tiv
variants or less commonly argumentive
ˌär-gyə-ˈmen-tiv
Synonyms of argumentative
1
: given to
argument : tending to
argue : having or showing a tendency to disagree or argue with other people in an angry way
Using politics again as an example. I apologize for Trump and MAGA, which means I acknowledge there may be arguments against him but the arguments in his favor outweigh the negative. This is a humble apology.
Today, we are dumbed down as a society and make such humble apologies less and less. On all topics - including religion and politics - we take the polar position that there is not one single argument against my position, all the facts line up on my side. This is not humble.
Deepak Chopra wrote a book called the 7 Laws of Spiritual Success. One law is the
Law of Defenselessness. What it means is to gain all kinds of energy and time by NOT defending what is not important to you. In this case, the facts against our position. Those who criticize the Bible, for instance, I can simultaneously acquiesce to their criticisms while also holding the Bible is the world of God that we should live our lives by.
In other words, it's application of
don't resist evil. We don't have to have an answer to every question or critique and this is very freeing and liberates us spiritually. I hope you take all this into consideration in your next apology.