The Prophetic Timeline: Why Jesuit Futurists/Jesuit Preterists Ignore It

[Phoneman777]

LOL. Circus clown or comedian. Which are you?

Using your terribly flawed and nonsensical logic, you are both a Jesuit Futurist and a Jesuit Preterist because you agree with at least one thing that each of those ridiculous end times systems teach. Using your ridiculous logic you also are a Jehovah's Witness, a Mormon and a Muslim. And a bunch of other things. Congratulations.

You refuse to answer whether the Man of Sin arose in the 1st century or are waiting for him to arise in the future because the former makes you a Jesuit Preterist and the latter, a Jesuit Futurist.

I'm a Protestant Historicist who knows Papal Rome arose in the 6th century in 538 and reigned the prophesied 1260 days (years) until 1798 - a fact that is almost completely forgotten by those who think they understand prophecy but are really "useful idiots" of the papacy which promote their agenda for them.

 

[Timtofly]

According to the prophetic timeline and history, the Man of Sin is Papal Rome that was restrained from arising by Pagan Rome. See, the prophetic timeline tracks Babylon to MP to Greece to Rome, to the Ten Barbarian Horns which arise out of the ashes of Rome, to the Little Horn "Man of Sin" which arises after Rome falls.

So Satan was papal Rome?

You are not getting that Satan was the 7th head with ten horns, but you will some day.

 

[Phoneman777]

So Satan was papal Rome?

You are not getting that Satan was the 7th head with ten horns, but you will some day.

That's not what Protestant Historicism teaches. Satan and his entire occult kingdom is represented by "the great dragon".

Daniel clearly establishes the papacy as the Little Horn, so when we get over to Revelation and see the parallels between the papal Little Horn and the Beast of chapter 13, we know where to pick up the story with John.