The "rapture" is but one, and the idea of a rapture spawns a multitude of others in the effort to support it.And yet you can't produce anything I am adding...
He was not.Darby was correct.
And so is Jesus. The term 'many' can mean a portion or a fraction of all, but it can actually also mean all, depending on the context in which it appears. Daniel's context there is 'all,' as evidenced by the fact that in the same sentence he talks about "some awaking to everlasting life" and "some awaking to everlasting contempt."Daniel 12 is talking about MANY of the people that sleep in the dust of the earth shall be raised.
Absolutely not:John 5 is talking about ALL that are still in the ground will come out. Two completely separate events.
Daniel 12:2 ~ "at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone whose name shall be found written in the book. And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt."
John 5:28-29 ~ "an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment."
If you don't see the close connection between the two, you just don't see it, I guess...
Hm. Well, wrong still; I disagree. See above.I am not calling that two folds. When MANY that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake........this occurs at the 6th seal when Jesus comes to gather the elect from heaven and earth. Those gathered from the earth.......dead and alive are the second fold.
No rapture. And we are in the period of tribulation now. And... Christ is with us, just as He said he would always be.Those gathered from heaven are the first fold that were taken to heaven at the pretrib rapture.
Nope. The Light, there's no need for any "rapture." When Jesus returns, He will defeat Satan once and for all, and, after the final Judgment and the unrepentant have departed, eternity begins.This is the rapture...
In your opinion. Yeah, that's fine. It's incorrect, and I've posted numerous scriptures that debunk such a thought, but... fair enough.There are two folds that become one fold.
What's very interesting to me is that of all the scriptures I've cited, all I've gotten is crickets from you. No rebuttal or any kind of offering of some different understanding or interpretation of those things. a slight variation of Martin Luther's closing words at the Synod of Dordt is applicable and appropriate, here... Unless I am convicted by Scripture and plain reason, I do not accept your "fact" as fact at all, as my conscience is captive to the Word of God. Here I stand, I cannot do otherwise.If you don't want to admit that FACT...
Both are of great importance; they must coincide.it just shows you are interested in doctrine and not truth.
Grace and peace to you.