Aunty Jane
Well-Known Member
Good question…..so what do we classify as a “miracle”? To me the small blessings that happen daily are not “miracles”, such as took place in the first century. We are talking about supernatural things, not things that can be explained another way, but things that defy explanation in our natural world.How then do we evaluate the source of a miracle?
Another good question…..but again we need to ask…..”what is Christianity”? Does God look down at the hopelessly divided church system with its wide range of beliefs and practices, and see what his son initiated?Does God only do miracles within the confines of Christianity, or perhaps none at all?
If Paul’s statement in 1 Cor 1:10 is the standard for being a “Christian”….then who qualifies?
”Now I urge you, brothers, through the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you should all speak in agreement and that there should be no divisions among you, but that you may be completely united in the same mind and in the same line of thought.”
How many ’branches’ of “Christianity” were there in the first century? The apostles were present to keep things on ‘the straight and narrow’, whilst Christian Scripture was being penned….but we are told that the the “wolves” were already trying to make inroads….so, after John’s last contribution, (to the final part of what is commonly referred to as the “New Testament”) Jesus warned that the devil would do to Christianity, exactly what he did to Judaism.….”while men were sleeping”. He would introduce the teachings of men and pretend that they came from God. (Matt 15:7-9) They would sound right to those who wanted their ears tickled, but given enough time, they would be accepted without question…and in fact, if one dared to question, they were silenced, often permanently. Same with Judaism. (Matt 23:37)
With the apostles now gone, there was nothing to stop what Jesus foretold…..so the basic question we have to answer is…..what about the “Christianity” we have chosen as “the one” founded on the teachings of Jesus? Is it really what it purports to be?….and have we chosen it because it suits what we want to believe, or because it practices what it preaches? And we need to ask “what does it preach” and “to whom does it it preach”?
If we go back to the beginning and start there, having a firm grasp of the Bible’s overarching message about God’s Kingdom and it’s appointed King, we will soon be able to tell the difference, as Malachi stated….…”And you will again see the distinction between a righteous person and a wicked person, between one serving God and one not serving him.” (Mal 3:18)
Jesus called them “wheat and weeds” or “sheep and goats”…..can we tell the difference? Jesus as our appointed judge can, because he sees what people are looking for in their “Christianity”.
Our hearts are impelling us to be, either one or the other, since there are no alternatives, and no fence to sit on whist we make our evaluation. Those rightly disposed will come to Christ because they have received an invitation from his Father. (John 6:44; 65)
So…what will be that “difference”? It will show in their beliefs and conduct, whether they interpret Scripture to justify what Jesus never taught (Exactly what the Jewish leaders did) or will they be a hated and persecuted minority as Jesus and his apostles and disciples were? (John 15:18-21; Matt 5:11-12)
People will more often gravitate to a convenient lie, rather than accept an inconveniet truth that forces them to make changes in their beliefs and attitudes.
So using the Bible as our only measuring tool, what do we see out there in Christendom? A cohesive singular group of Christians who all globally hold the same beliefs in common….or do we see the exact opposite?
For some we see that their nationality rather than a location, has a bearing on the name of their church….for others their identification is linked to a Bible theme…..but does the denomination make a scrap of difference if they are divided and failing to agree on so many things? Who is the creator of confusion? Not God.
Is antiquity a good basis for belief? Was it for the Pharisees and Sadducees in Jesus’ day? Did the fact that they had ruled God’s people for centuries make a scrap of difference to how they received the truth when Jesus preached it? Just the opposite…..they were so firmly entrenched in their errors that Jesus did not bother to preach to them, rather he condemned them outright as those deserving of “Gehenna”. (Matt 23:33) Jesus was sent to “the lost sheep” who were “lost” because their shepherds were too busy looking after themselves.
From my perspective, I see only “sheep and goats” and “wheat and weeds” clearly identified by what they preach and teach, mostly “to the converted” since they rarely venture from the comfort of their own churches. (Matt 24:14) If their reach is not global, then a local isolated church is not the right one.
Any push for ecumenism can be achieved only if they ignore their many differences and don’t talk about them. This is how “non-denominationalism” or “inter-denominationalism” works. But how does God view this situation? It was all foretold, so there are no surprises for him in what exists as “Christianity” today…..what we have at this juncture (with the imminent return of Christ as judge) exactly what was foretold.
Yet the ‘blinded’ majority will not see it. (2 Cor 4:3-4) They are so intent on making the Christian Faith fit their own criteria that they forget that God and Christ have their own, established long ago. “Few” will be found on the road to life. (Matt 7:13-14; 21-23) There will be no excuses accepted by “the one who judges righteously”.
History is repeating right under our collective noses…..