J
Johann
Guest
Wrong answer-but I'm done here.Answered.
Have a blessed day.
J.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Wrong answer-but I'm done here.Answered.
Again, empty claims. No substance.Wrong answer-but I'm done here.
Have a blessed day.
J.
Again, empty claims. No substance.
I agree Romans 14 can encompass the issue in 1 Co 8, but Romans 14 is not 1 Co 8 (Ro 14 encompasses generalities(21It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything to cause your brother to stumble."), 1 Co 8 is a specific example--and the condemnation (because he "sins against Christ", according to 1 Co 8) on the one who eats with faith in a way that is destructive to his brother (and he ought to have kept his faith between himself and God) is a different condemnation than the condemnation on the one who eats without faith.NASB "but they are evil for the man who eats and gives offense"
NKJV, Peshitta "but it is evil for the man who eats with offense"
NRSV "but it is wrong for you to make others fall by what you eat"
TEV "but it is wrong to eat anything that will cause someone else to fall into sin"
NJB "but it becomes evil if by eating it you make somebody else fall away"
REB "but it is wrong to eat if by eating you cause another to stumble"
This verse is the central truth of this Romans (cf. 1 Cor. 10:25-26; Titus 1:15).
This is referring to meat offered to an idol in a pagan temple (cf. 1 Corinthians 8-10). The meat is not good or evil, but if a weak believer, who thinks it is inappropriate, sees another Christian eating it and also eats, that which is morally neutral becomes evil because it violates his/her personal consciousness of the will of God (cf. Rom. 14:23).
You're not citing the text, which says he is "condemned", you're citing a commentary, and the commentator has a particular theological view he is defending by commenting the way he does.14:23 "But he who doubts" This is a PRESENT MIDDLE PARTICIPLE. This refers to the over-scrupulous Christian of Rom. 14:3.
"is condemned This is a PERFECT PASSIVE INDICATIVE from kata + krinō, meaning
"placed in a guilty light by contrast" (cf. Harold K. Moulton, The analytical Greek Lexicon Revised, p. 216)
"not condemnation, but the punishment following sentence" (cf. Rom. 5:16,18; 8:1 [cf. Moulton and Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament, p. 328])
Here, it refers to the violation of one's conscience and the resulting pain associated with the convicting of the Holy Spirit, not to one's salvation.
How many times ? "Not to one's salvation!"
ROMANS 14
www.freebiblecommentary.org
Think about your argument : "the believer can live in sin (by walking contrary to his beliefs, contrary to the law of his mind--already, this state of affairs had been the description of being enslaved, killed, by sin (Ro 7:8-24)), and his sinning will not affect his justification, nor result in his death".14:23 "But he who doubts" This is a PRESENT MIDDLE PARTICIPLE. This refers to the over-scrupulous Christian of Rom. 14:3.
"is condemned This is a PERFECT PASSIVE INDICATIVE from kata + krinō, meaning
"placed in a guilty light by contrast" (cf. Harold K. Moulton, The analytical Greek Lexicon Revised, p. 216)
"not condemnation, but the punishment following sentence" (cf. Rom. 5:16,18; 8:1 [cf. Moulton and Milligan, The Vocabulary of the Greek Testament, p. 328])
Here, it refers to the violation of one's conscience and the resulting pain associated with the convicting of the Holy Spirit, not to one's salvation.
How many times ? "Not to one's salvation!"
Your choice of Scripture references is simply amazing--Let's see.and the condemnation (because he "sins against Christ", according to 1 Co 8) on the one who eats with faith in a way that is destructive to his brother (and he ought to have kept his faith between himself and God) is a different condemnation than the condemnation on the one who eats without faith.
Both the brother who eats without faith and the brother who caused him to eat without faith have sinned--and, as I said, they're both condemned, but the condemnation on the one is for a different reason than the condemnation on the other.Who is sinning against Christ here?
Yep.Ye sin against Christ - Because:
(1) Christ has commanded you to love them, and seek their good, and not to lead them into sin, and,
I simply can't believe your line of reasoning.Both the brother who eats without faith and the brother who caused him to eat without faith have sinned--and, as I said, they're both condemned, but the condemnation on the one is for a different reason than the condemnation on the other.
Yep.
However, how is this supposed to be relevant to your claim that I am abusing Ro 14:23?
Will you please clarify how any of this proves I'm abusing Romans 14:23?I simply can't believe your line of reasoning.
128. THE SYNONYMOUS WORDS
USED FOR
"SIN", "WICKEDNESS",
"EVIL", "UNGODLINESS",
"DISOBEDIENCE",
"TRANSGRESSION", ETC.
I. SIN i. The Verb. hamartano = to miss the mark or aim; then, to miss or wander from the right path; to go, or do, wrong. ii. The Noun.
1. hamartia = a failing to hit the mark; aberration from prescribed law (connected with and resulting from the above). In N.T. always in a moral sense = a sin, whether by omission or commission, in thought, word, or deed. Also used in connection with the sin-offering (Heb_10:6; Heb_10:8; Heb_10:18; Heb_13:11, as in Psa_40:6, cp. Lev_5:8). 2. hamartema = the actual sin. The evil principle in action; the sinful act or deed. 3. paraptoma = a falling aside, when one should have stood upright. Hence (morally) a fall, a falling aside from truth and equity; a fault, or trespass. In Rom_5:12, No. 1 entered the world. The disobedience of Adam ( vv . 15, 17, 18) was No. 3, and the law entered that No. 3 which before was error, might become criminal in the knowledge of the sinner. After this, where No. 1 abounded, grace did much more abound.
II. WICKEDNESS 1. poneria = depravity; iniquity, the wicked acting of the evil nature. See No. III. 1 below. 2. kakia = depravity, the vicious disposition and desires, rather than the active exercise of them, which is No. 1 ( poneria ).
III. EVIL (Adj. and Noun). 1. poneros = full of labors and pains in working mischief; evil intent (Mat_12:39. Luk_11:29); grudging, in connection with the idea expressed in the "evil eye" (Mat_6:23; Mat_20:15. See the context, and cp. Luk_11:13). 2. kakos = depraved, bad in nature. Cp. No. II. 2. 3. anomos = lawless, contempt of law. 4. anomia = lawlessness. 5. athesmos = breaking through all restraints of ordinances or institutes, divine or human, to gratify one’s lusts. Occurs only in 2Pe_2:7; 2Pe_3:17.
IV. UNGODLINESS 1. asebeia = impiety, absence of "the fear of God", having no reverence for sacred things; irreligious. Sept. for pasha ’. Ap. 44. ix.
V. DISOBEDIENCE, ETC. 1. apeitheia = unwillingness to be persuaded, leading to obstinacy. 2. parakoe = unwillingness to hear, disobedient.
VI. TRANSGRESS, TRANSGRESSOR. 1. parabaino = to step on one side, overstep, go aside from, violate, transgress. 2. parerchomai = to go past, pass by, neglect. 3. parabates , one who steps aside, or oversteps.
VII. INIQUITY 1. adikia = unrighteousness, wrongdoing. 2. adikema = a wrong done. 3. paranomia = acting contrary to law or custom. Occ. only in 2Pe_2:16.
VIII. ERR, ERROR 1. planao = to cause to wander or go astray; used of doctrinal error and religious deceit. Cp. planos 1Ti_4:1, "seducing"). 2. apoplanao . No. 1 with apo = away from, prefixed (Ap. 104. iv). In Pass., to go astray from, swerve. Occ. only in Mar_13:22 and 1Ti_6:10.
3. astocheo = to deviate from. Occ. only in 1Ti_1:6; 1Ti_6:21. 2Ti_2:18. IX. FAULT 1. hettema = a diminishing of that which should have been rendered in full measure; diminution, decrease. Occ. in Rom_11:12 and 1Co_6:7.
3.22 AM here in South Africa.
Tired.
J.
If I were you, I'd go to sleep.3.22 AM here in South Africa
I'm telling you, brother, nothing (except praying) is worth missing sleep. It ages you--your hair line will recede more rapidly, the lines on your face will proceed, and, internally, the corresponding aging will occur.3.22 AM here in South Africa.
Individuals who are 'hearers' and 'doers' to the word/saying/teaching of Jesus Christ. When eventually in 'oneness' and 'togetherness' disciple by the same doctrine, they form a gathering/church/body of Christ. These were churches in the beginning built alone by the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets. In testimony we have them in the New Testament of the Holy Bible. Where we also of today are supposedly built in, even by the Old Testament, in complete similar display like them.I think I lost you at the bakery.
Who is beguiled?
Who disguises himself as the spirit of light?
I believe Matthew 7:23.....is speaking to individuals.
Jesus states EVERYONE who hears these words of Mine....
these would be individuals and not denominations.
Because then was the starting of individual discipleship of them who would become Apostles. Apostles who are sent out to make likewise disciple of all nation, in same word/saying/teaching of Jesus Christ. Even to the establishment in togetherness and oneness by one doctrine, gathering/church/body of Christ in every places.There were no denominations at the time of Jesus....the Christian church had not even begun yet.
We're no wise nor able to advice Christ, but rather abide and hopefully be among the few who will find it.Agreed. I just hope more than a few find it.
For i've had help from the Holy Ghost serving to testify, and those verse are for me too, to abide.And you posted good verses.
I like, especially, John 8:31
and yes, we're to follow Jesus' teachings, as 2 John 1:9-11 states.
Yes john , pual and even peter make mention of these things .
John even says IF that which ye have been TAUGHT shall REMAIN IN YOU
THEN you shall continue in the Father and the SON .
You see already way back then the spirit of anti christ had come to decieve .
Wanna hear something big time scary for a lot of christendom today .
THAT SPIRIT OF ANTI CHRIST IS ALL OVER IT .
HOW SO you might ask . What DID JOHN say was a liar and an anti christ . HE who denies JESUS IS THE CHRIST .
What did john say about one who believes NOT the testmony that GOD gave of HIS SON . HE calls GOD A LIAR .
but what does todays big ol all inclusive love train try and say to the church .
OH the other religoins serving the same GOD we do . EVEN THOUGH THEY DENY JESUS IS THE CHRIST
even though they DENY and dont BELIEVE THE TESTIMONY that GOD gave of HIS SON and thus CALL GOD A LIAR .
SO how on earth are we and the mulsims or any other friggen religoin servingthe same GOD .
THEY DENY THE NEED to BELIEVE JESUS IS THE CHRIST and just say we all serve the same GOD junk .
THAT IS OF ANTI CHRIST . and you would marvel at how many are now going right under it
JESUS is getting denied by a false broad path fake love to GOD LIE . that most of the church is now beginining to follow suit with .
ITS OF ANTI CHRIST . and i dont follow anti christ or anti christs . ITS THE ONE TRUE GOSPEL for me .
...again, more "deflection" : what happens to the person who has been forgiven but who does not forgive? Does the forgiveness remain or is it ultimately rescinded? And how did he get the forgiveness in the first place? By the righteousness of faith which says "blessed is the man whose sins God will not remember" (Ro 4:6-8). Thus, how does he lose the forgiveness? By the righteousness of faith being removed/forgotten as Ezekiel 18:24 says, thus debunking your empty claims.
A true christian will always forgive, even if, he needs some prodding.
True Christians never sin--they never fail to forgive?
What happened to the Corinthians, then? They were living in sin!
I said a true christian, you don't have the scope to understand. When we don't do what God wants us to do, he will bring us to a point where we do, do it.
What is a "true Christian"? Someone who has true faith? The guy in the parable had true faith, because the righteousness of faith is defined as being forgiven (Ro 4:6-8).
Again, you're saying Christ is a liar, that the Father will NEVER do this to us, never remove our forgiveness--sorry, again, I go with the text.
You read lireralistically what you want to read, you will never understand the bible that way:
Their sins and lawless deeds I will remmeber no more.
The holy spirit testified to those words, I would be careful how you respond
When you say that true Christians always forgive (to try to rescue your hide from the tanning Scripture is giving your false conclusions), you're stating that Christians don't sin.
Consider the reasoning he is using :In other words, "The only way to make the Bible make sense is to arbitrarily not take Christ seriously when He says this thing over here, but to arbitrarily decide to take Christ seriously over here! I call my theology cherry pie: I cherry-pick through the Bible parts I like and discard parts I don't like, and I make my theological pie out of my cherry picked truths!"
If we would judge ourselves we would not be judged
but when we are chastened of GOD it is so that we are not condemned with the world . yep .
For this cause many are sick ........
GOD does chasten . Yep . And the church ought to correct its memebers that are in sin as well .
But yes my friend . GOD does chasten . He sure does my friend . He sure does .
This is a general reminder to us all .Consider the reasoning he is using :
"Jesus teaches many parables, and we are to take them seriously, but, here, the parable Jesus tells Peter--because he asked for instruction about forgiveness (instructions Christ wanted His apostles to bring to the nations, so they would observe all He taught)--that ends with the explicit lesson, 'So My heavenly Father will do to YOU if you do not forgive', you are in error for taking THIS particular parable seriously (why do you not take Jesus seriously when He says 'cut your hand off if it makes you sin'?), because Christ was just wasting His breath uttering such folly about events which could never occur. Christ also mischaracterized God to His disciples by attributing to God the capacity to rescind forgiveness--those were mere words He didn't want taken seriously, because they reflect no reality about God."
correctamendo my friend . this is exactly what they do . but why do they do thisConsider the reasoning he is using :
"Jesus teaches many parables, and we are to take them seriously, but, here, the parable Jesus tells Peter--because he asked for instruction about forgiveness (instructions Christ wanted His apostles to bring to the nations, so they would observe all He taught)--that ends with the explicit lesson, 'So My heavenly Father will do to YOU if you do not forgive', you are in error for taking THIS particular parable seriously (why do you not take Jesus seriously when He says 'cut your hand off if it makes you sin'?), because Christ was just wasting His breath uttering such folly about events which could never occur. Christ also mischaracterized God to His disciples by attributing to God the capacity to rescind forgiveness--those were mere words He didn't want taken seriously, because they reflect no reality about God."
Not saying this about johann . But this is just a simple reminder .I'm telling you, brother, nothing (except praying) is worth missing sleep. It ages you--your hair line will recede more rapidly, the lines on your face will proceed, and, internally, the corresponding aging will occur.