Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The Jerusalem you are rambling about whose people you obviously hate so much is not even married to God. She has no covenant because she lives in rejection of the only covenant of God that He has with His elect - the New Covenant. Ezekiel mentions that covenant whose coming is now past tense.
The people in Jerusalem now are not part of the new covenant.They reject it and Christ who brought it.
And only a married woman with a covenant is considered a harlot in the Bible. You are 2,000 years late in identifying Jerusalem in the Middle east as a harlot and light years away from identifying Babylon the Great of the Revelation.
Not from you. I've used it before and never saw you using it anywhere.
Let me fill you in on something. God dealt with them long ago already for being a harlot in 70 AD and destroyed their city and temple. You are way behind in your biblical history.
I never saw you use it before. I used it recently. Maybe an hour ago? Or a little more at this point, I guess. But, you guys are going back and forth so much that it probably is a couple pages back by now. I'll find it and link it for you.
God called Jerusalem a harlot. Then she was cut off from God after Christ died. Now He has a different bride. Also called His wife in Revelation.
So if they worship the beast and it's image and recieve it's mark ,then God won't be upset with them?
God says Jerusalem is a harlot.
Here's my post from a couple hours ago in this thread: The Resurrection = the Commencement of the millennium
God would be upset with anyone who does that. Any other dumb questions you'd like to ask?
I really never saw you use it and wasn't reading every post you made because we had one another on ignore and did not see it and I definitely have used it before - last time was long ago and it was probably with Keraz or one of the others who always place historically fulfilled prophecy into their favorite end of the age and last days folders.
Well,you said God has already taken care of business.
I never read that. So we used the same expression. No big deal because though I have used it before - long before this and a few times - I do not consider it an extremely imaginative way to speak about someone using his imaginative mouse cutting a prophecy out of its Old Testament context and fulfillment ,and pasting it into a folder titled "the end of the age and return of Christ".
I don't actually have you on my ignore list. I trust myself that I can be disciplined enough to not try to debate you on anything at this point. I only responded here because of the time machine joke thing. I wondered if you saw my post referencing the time machine and that gave you the idea, but obviously that's not the case. Regardless, we agree that his view is complete nonsense and he is way behind in his biblical historical knowledge. History isn't going to repeat itself but he apparently thinks it will.
In relation to Jerusalem He most certainly did. Their city and temple were completely destroyed. At the second coming of Christ He will take care of business with all unbelievers in the world and not just Jewish unbelievers.
God very specifically named the harlot of the Old Testament, calling her "Jerusalem".
It's just a funny thing and nothing more. I truly have no idea what he's talking about with this Medes attacking Babylon in the future thing. I think it's completely ridiculous and deserves to be mocked the way we did by referencing him using a time machine. It can't be taken seriously at all.
