Why Antiochus Epiphanes IV Is Not The Little Horn - Part 2: "exceeding great"

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You are not paying attention to what I'm saying. It isn't only in heaven as the following passages show:

Hebrews 12:18 You have not come to a mountain that can be touched and that is burning with fire; to darkness, gloom and storm; 19 to a trumpet blast or to such a voice speaking words that those who heard it begged that no further word be spoken to them, 20 because they could not bear what was commanded: “If even an animal touches the mountain, it must be stoned to death.” 21 The sight was so terrifying that Moses said, “I am trembling with fear.” 22 But you have come to Mount Zion, to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem. You have come to thousands upon thousands of angels in joyful assembly,

Galatians 4:25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. 26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.

The New Jerusalem is referred to as "the bride, the Lamb's wife" (Revelation 21:9). It's a symbolic representation of the church. We are part of it now, as this passage clearly shows. Will you please address this? Part of it is in heaven and part is on earth. The souls of the dead in Christ are the part that is in heaven and we on earth are also part of it, as this scripture indicates.

What other city at the time when Revelation 20:9 occurs could be considered "the beloved city" except for the heavenly new Jerusalem?

Just because I may be showing you something that you haven't seen before doesn't mean you should immediately dismiss it. Are you willing to be objective with scripture?
You are either contradicting your own eschatology, or misrepresenting your own view of the age to come.

The New Jerusalem is the age to come. You are saying we are already in that age to come, and this is as good as it gets.

Either Revelation 21 is chronologically after Revelation 20, or we are already experiencing the NHNE, and we are already in the age to come, which started at the Cross, and this current age will never end for all eternity. This is it. What sin and transgression has been removed was already removed at the Cross. There will be no change at the Second Coming, because the change happened at the first coming with the New Jerusalem already half descended, and half remaining in heaven.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,794
4,469
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You are either contradicting your own eschatology, or misrepresenting your own view of the age to come.
Neither. You are the last person who should try to tell me what I believe. I will tell you what I believe. And you will misunderstand what I tell you. That's how it has always been with you.

The New Jerusalem is the age to come. You are saying we are already in that age to come, and this is as good as it gets.
Nope. I'm not saying that at all. We do not yet have immortal bodies like we will in the eternal age to come. I am saying we are now SPIRITUALLY in the new Jerusalem even though we are not yet in it with immortal bodies. Do you have any concept of SPIRITUAL things?
 

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
15,017
4,467
113
70
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
My My,you have the credentials of a true Pharisee.Lets praise God who rejects people like yourself and reveals his word to babes.

Mathew 11:25

At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.
Well we will find out in the end won't we.

As for your version of Christianity, your hate filled heart and ready willingness to call people unsaved is why I left the church as a kid and had to be found by Jesus. So you oppose being educated in the faith and I guess trust your feelings and hairs standing on the back of you rneck to learn truth?

YOu will be sadly surprised when people you are so willing to accuse and mock are seated higher on the table than you.

Have the last word, I am finished with your pseudo Christianity.
 

tailgator

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2024
2,845
221
63
61
North Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well we will find out in the end won't we.

As for your version of Christianity, your hate filled heart and ready willingness to call people unsaved is why I left the church as a kid and had to be found by Jesus. So you oppose being educated in the faith and I guess trust your feelings and hairs standing on the back of you rneck to learn truth?

YOu will be sadly surprised when people you are so willing to accuse and mock are seated higher on the table than you.

Have the last word, I am finished with your pseudo Christianity.
Whatever
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,794
4,469
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
My My,you have the credentials of a true Pharisee.Lets praise God who rejects people like yourself and reveals his word to babes.

Mathew 11:25

At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.
This is completely uncalled for and way over the line. I disagree with him on some things as well, but he has done nothing to indicate that he is not a true Christian. Which is what you are accusing him of here by basically calling him "a true Pharisee" and saying God rejects people like him.

Judge not or you will be judged by the same measure that you are judging him (Matthew 7:1-2). Having the correct end times doctrine is not how to determine if someone is a Christian or not.
 

tailgator

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2024
2,845
221
63
61
North Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This is completely uncalled for and way over the line. I disagree with him on some things as well, but he has done nothing to indicate that he is not a true Christian. Which is what you are accusing him of here by basically calling him "a true Pharisee" and saying God rejects people like him.

Judge not or you will be judged by the same measure that you are judging him (Matthew 7:1-2). Having the correct end times doctrine is not how to determine if someone is a Christian or not.
If you going to brag about how you are taught as a Pharisees is taught then you should expect to be called a Pharisee.

You don't see any of the prophets of God bragging as Ronald does.. .
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,794
4,469
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If you going to brag about how you are taught as a Pharisees is taught then you should expect to be called a Pharisee.
No, such a person should expect to be told that that they are believing one particular thing that the Pharisees also believed. It does not make someone a Pharisee if the person only agrees with one thing the Pharisees believed but disagrees with them on many other things. They didn't believe in Jesus. They didn't believe He rose from the dead and that He is God. The person you are calling a Pharisee does believe that Jesus rose from the dead and is God. So, there is no reason for you to call him a Pharisee.
 

tailgator

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2024
2,845
221
63
61
North Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
No, such a person should expect to be told that that they are believing one particular thing that the Pharisees also believed. It does not make someone a Pharisee if the person only agrees with one thing the Pharisees believed but disagrees with them on many other things. They didn't believe in Jesus. They didn't believe He rose from the dead and that He is God. The person you are calling a Pharisee does believe that Jesus rose from the dead and is God. So, there is no reason for you to call him a Pharisee.
Well,I praise God that he did not reveal these things To Ronald but instead revealed them to babes.
 

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2020
9,639
629
113
Mount Morris
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Neither. You are the last person who should try to tell me what I believe. I will tell you what I believe. And you will misunderstand what I tell you. That's how it has always been with you.


Nope. I'm not saying that at all. We do not yet have immortal bodies like we will in the eternal age to come. I am saying we are now SPIRITUALLY in the new Jerusalem even though we are not yet in it with immortal bodies. Do you have any concept of SPIRITUAL things?
Spiritual means of God, instead of "of sin". Spiritual does not mean symbolic, does not mean the opposite of physical, nor even the opposite of literal. Only Paradise is that heavenly Jerusalem. There is no city, until this current creation is declared over, which you term this current age. There is no New Jerusalem until the next age or creation (reality). Because John did not see this NHNE until after the old has passed (fled) away.

I have never seen you claim that Revelation 21 is just another parallel view, going back to the Cross. You seem to deny that the Cross was a new age distinct from an old age. I don't think any one thinks, heaven and earth fled away in the first century except hard core Preterist, and you deny being one, even though you agree on some points, no?

Jerusalem being the heavenly mother of us all, is a metaphor, as is mount Sion / Zion. The OT saw heaven as a duplicate of what was on the earth, including a heavenly temple. Yet you deny they have physically been enjoying any physical attributes, even if there was an actual city.

"By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowing whither he went. By faith he sojourned in the land of promise, as in a strange country, dwelling in tabernacles with Isaac and Jacob, the heirs with him of the same promise: For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God."

"These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth. For they that say such things declare plainly that they seek a country. And truly, if they had been mindful of that country from whence they came out, they might have had opportunity to have returned. But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city."

Is this a literal physical city that comes to earth? Or does it turn physical once it gets to the earth?

No such thing as immortal bodies. No verse claims humans were created with immortal bodies on the 6th day, nor ever given immortal bodies. But call them what you want. A physical body is still a physical body. In the image of God we are equally a physical body with a covering spirit.

The point is that you deny a physical body now in Paradise, but deny a future physical city as well. Receiving Adam's original physical body was the redemption obtained at the Cross. They physically came out of their graves never to physically die again. Paradise is that heavenly country that contains the physical tree of life. Their bodies don't need to eat from that tree to sustain life. The point is that both are as physical as the day God created mankind and on the day God planted a physical tree of life in the Garden of Eden. That God given body of physical flesh has never changed.

But God changed out that body you call immortal with a body of death many call mortal. I just call it a body of death. That corruptible body of death was passed down to all of Adam and Eve's offspring. But when the soul leaves that body of death, it is made alive by putting on God's permanent incorruptible physical body. That is what 2 Corinthians 5:1 explicitly states.

"For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens."

The sin covenant with death is dissolved, and the redemption of the body is complete at the moment of physical death for all the redeemed. They now enter that heavenly country of Paradise.

They are physically seated with Jesus, serving God day and night in that heavenly temple. They do have access to the tree of life. God has that New Jerusalem prepared for them, when the time comes, and the entire church descends to the earth. Why is this physical future so hard to accept, when you have no issues with a physical creation in Genesis 1 and 2? Creation is and was equally spiritual because it came directly from God, and could interact with God. Both angels and humans sang and shouted out God praises during that first Day of the Lord.

You call it an eternal age. If you do not see it as a new heaven and a new earth, then that New Jerusalem is a physical creation in eternity waiting for us. But the NHNE has a beginning just like this OHOE started in Genesis 1. Either way, we have no access to eternity, only God exists in eternity. But the physicality of heaven is just as real as the physicality of earth. If God moved Paradise from the earth and it is now a part of heaven, the physicality did not change, but the location changed. The Tree of life started out on earth, but it is now in heaven. It is going to return to earth, but that is all physical aspects of creation, not just some spiritual excuse many use to describe physical reality they deny is physical.