Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
John 3.36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them.John 3:36
John 3.36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them.
That's an interesting quote you use to define God's "Wrath." It sounds like it is something that has been potentially on Man from the beginning, when Adam and Eve sinned.
So, if we indulge our sinful nature, then God's Wrath rests upon us?
And if men reject Christ, then God's Wrath "remains" on them?
Is that how you see it? If so, how would you apply this in an eschatological context? Is God's "Wrath" the act of judging the Antichristian Empire,
Personally, I think good people who are truly innocent will die at Armageddon,
which I believe will be a nuclear war.
Well I think that I can understand your words here Ronald…and I understand the process of spiritual maturity in discernment for sure.That is partially it. That concept is not as outwardly, behaviorally, mindfully realized when we become Christians. God sanctifies us spiritually in an instant, but gradually in our minds and behavior.
Realistically Ronald...one has to walk in the spirit to grow spiritually.We grow spiritually and we don't walk in the Spirit.
But listen, a teaching about "sarx" and how it wars against our spirit is an advanced study that I cannot simply describe in a few sentences.
Agreed brother…however just as important is the reality that those who died to sin…were buried in baptism…resurrected by the same Spirit that resurrected our Lord…to the same eternal life…have obtained the power and authority to overcome the flesh and as a result are dead to sin…exactly as Paul teaches. As Paul said we are no longer under the law…we are under grace."Sin dwells in the members of our flesh" is a reality and scriptural. We are no longer slaves to it and have been forgiven, but itndoesn't mean we don't backslide into our old ways.
I agree with this that you speak of Ronald…however…if nothing can separate us from our Father…as we live in His almighty presence…at what point did your failure even once remove you from His presence, His house, His body, His temple, Him?This is why we are encouraged over and over again because our behavior doesn't all of a sudden become perfect. Paul wrestled with this in Romans 7. "I do the things I do not want to do ... it is not me but sin that dwells in me. It is conflicting to begin with but then be ones more manageable ... but decades later, and I still think selfishly sometimes, still impatient, and sometimes when I am called to love my neighbor, I say no, not today. I don't feel like the
Good Samaitan ALL THE TIME. So that is a mild war that goes on, to love or not to love.
What’s left to be redeemed? Are you saying we only have a partial redemption in this life on earth? For those “in Christ”…how is it that they “are”…”in Christ” and not fully redeemed Ronald?Lol. Already saved but not yet fully redeemed and not yet glorified.
I disagree…while it is true that the flesh will never be resurrected…nor was Christ’s…flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God…when the Holy Spirit came into my spirit I was resurrected spiritually like Christ by the exact same power and authority that resurrected Christ Yahshua no less.We haven't been resurrected like Christ yet.
No…in this I must agree with you…thankfully I have been given the down payment…the Holy Spirit.Do you have your new eternal body yet? NO.
How is it you say “we are freed from the bondage of sin”…and that “we don’t practice it” (sin)…then allude to the idea that we are “no different” in our failure than those given to the bondage of sin? This would mean that our new birth experience and our spiritual citizenship in the heavenly Kingdom of our Father would confer no greater advantage for us than that of an unjustified sinner.We are freed from the bondage of sin. We don't practice it. But we often do the same things non- believers do. Is it sin for them and not for us?
I was active with Campus Crusade in 1970-72 when rapture mania was in full bloom. I well-remember the Hal Lindsey nonsense. He had to do so much tap-dancing away from his ever-changing prophecies it became pathetic. We were assured in Crusade the rapture was right around the corner. JFK was being kept alive on Onassis' yacht and would be the beast whose seemingly mortal head wound was miraculously healed (the reference is actually to Nero, who was the subject of rumors at the time). I later listened to the entire Left Behind CD series, which was loaned to me by an atheist friend who found it fascinating strictly as science fiction!A small rapture?
I was taught a Pretrib Rapture in the early 70s by friends and the church I began to attend. But I had been raised in church from birth where no such thing ever existed. Since this was new to me, and held by all my new Christian friends, I thought Pretribism was the way to go.
Hal Lindsey had written a book called "The Late Great Planet Earth," and was taking the "world by storm." Lindsey was out of Dallas Theological Seminary, I believe, where they all taught Dispensationalism, which contains Pretrib Doctrine.
So I watched the movies that depicted Christians suddenly disappearing, leaving their cars and planes unattended, and maybe even leaving their clothes behind. And the world "left behind" seemed caught unprepared and unaware of what just happened.
So the world came up with some idea to explain how so many people ended up disappearing--perhaps an alien invasion? And they then proceeded to become terribly ungodly and antichristian since the Christians of the world had gone away, leaving backsliders and pagans in charge.
Not long after becoming Pretrib my brother started harping on me about the need to memorize Scripture. He had participated in Bill Gothard's course on Bible memorization and wanted to pass that on to me. After preaching to me for a half hour or so I decided maybe I should try to memorize some Scripture.
To my surprise memorization came easy for me. Before I knew it I had memorized a few entire books of the NT. 1 John, Colossians, and 2 Thessalonians were were I started. I probably memorized half of the book of Revelation before I got a stopped doing this.
In the process of memorizing 2 Thessalonians I realized that Paul was teaching *against Pretribism!* He said that the Rapture cannot take place until Antichrist is actually destroyed at the Coming of Jesus! And in his time Antichrist had not come yet.
From this point on I've been Postrib. I had a moment of doubt when I moved to S. CA in the mid-70s, after reading Chuck Smith's Commentary on the Revelation. But after some unusual circumstances I was led, I believe, back to full acceptance of Postrib Doctrine, and determined never again to doubt what my 2 eyes are telling me! ;)
I say all this to explain this post. I still believe a Rapture will happen. But will it have the same strange phenomena happen as with the Pretrib scenarios, with people disappearing and the world left trying to explain where people went? This seems all so mythical to me, so fable-like! I'm a bit embarrassed to present the Gospel with things so unlikely, though the resurrectiton is equally a miracle but far more likely in my thinking.
I'm wondering if maybe the real Rapture will be unlike how the Pretrib movies portray it? Jesus said that when he comes will he find faith on the earth? This means that though Nominal Christianity is ubiquitous and common, genuine born again Christianity will not be so apparent, and may not exist as such except in dark corners of the earth.
If so, the Rapture may be more of an unseen event, as though happening when most of the world is hunkered down in bomb shelters during a nuclear war, rather than driving cars and piloting planes. If you look at the account of Elijah's "Rapture" he is even searched for, being that the event is far more subtle than a large-scale disappearance.
Perhaps the real Rapture will be confined to much smaller numbers in a time when religion is on the way out, and born again Christianity is so marginalized that it is no longer part of the mainstream? This may be a ways off, but the way things are going now I can see it happening. Large groups of Christians are being exposed as frauds, and antichristianity is taking over the world, pushing true Christians out of the way. Your thoughts?
2 Kings 2.9 When they had crossed, Elijah said to Elisha, “Tell me, what can I do for you before I am taken from you?”
“Let me inherit a double portion of your spirit,” Elisha replied.
10 “You have asked a difficult thing,” Elijah said, “yet if you see me when I am taken from you, it will be yours—otherwise, it will not.”
...16 “Look,” they said, “we your servants have fifty able men. Let them go and look for your master. Perhaps the Spirit of the Lord has picked him up and set him down on some mountain or in some valley.” “No,” Elisha replied, “do not send them.”
That is what the 'rapture to heaven' belief is.strictly as science fiction!
Yes of course…Behold…my opinion…an “opinion” that I formed by revelation and the study of a previous type and shadow of the same…something pointing to how God has poured out His wrath in another place and time on the earth…and recorded it for us in scripture…something like using the scripture to interpret the scripture…do you do that? Are you familiar with the story…may I ask?Its "questionable" to you, you mean,
According to your opinion.
I do realize this…that was the point behind me showing you an example of “God’s wrath” being poured out once already…and how things played out in that earlier iteration of a similar act of the eternal God upon the earth. He only pours His wrath upon the wicked…with His people right there as well…exactly as in the Egyptian scenario…I would expect it to always be like that with a Just God and Father.But, if you realize that God's wrath is on UNBELIEVERS..
JOHN 3:36
NOT the Bride.
Not the Body of Christ
Not the Born again.
My contention with you at this point is the fact that here in this post you seemed to have conveniently overlooked a small portion of what you said in your first post…which is what prompted my response in the first place. May I quote you…Behold…?See, God poured out the "cup" on Jesus, who said..>"if possible let this CUP, pass from ME".
See that Cup?
That is God's Judgment against Sin.. And If fell on Jesus, never will it fall on the Born again.
The Born again will never be Judged by God's Wrath........not on earth and not in eternity.
God does not pour out His Wrath on those who are "IN Christ"... "one with God" and already """seated in Heavenly places in Christ".
Who is that?
All the born again.
Are you one?
So, the WRATH to come, is not going to fall on The Sons/Daughter's of God, who were born again before the Trib started.
Ok…so we have already established that I agree with a part of your post…”God won’t pour out His wrath upon believers”…You then ask a rhetorical question…”So why would BELIEVERS need to be here for that? To which you answered for yourself…”They aren’t.”When Jesus comes back to take vengeance on "those who obey not the Gospel".
(They have not believed it)....
So, why would the BELIEVERS need to be here for that?
A.) They aren't.
Thank you for the extended answer. Though we have "spats," now and then, I think we're pretty much agreed on your points.Thats the "wrath".
And Jesus died on the Cross so that you dont have to face it after you die.
See, when that "wrath" has been poured out on Jesus on the Cross for the sin of all Believers, then this explains why the Born again die and meet God as FATHER, and the unbelievers, never born again, meet God as eternal Judge.
The wrath of God is revealed against sin, both on the earth and also .. in eternity.
Examples of God's write on the Earth......
"noah's flood
"sodom and Gomorrah"
"great Tribulation"
"the 2nd advent"
People who write books and have TV programs that try to insult the Cross... it can be that they end up dying, soon afterwards.
"God is not mocked".
In Fact Jesus will rebuke a believer for being so deceived that they preach against the Cross.
also, God will reward a person, unbeliever or believer... who cheats against a Christian regarding doing business (money)...
= "Ananias and Sapphira"
And then there is after you die, eternal judgment.... that is John 3:36. = That one is for Christ Rejectors, who were never born again.
That judgement comes to those who have committed the unpardonable sin, and their name is not found in the "Lamb's book of Life".
Who are thy?
These...
"if you willfully sin".. and "trod underfoot the blood of Jesus"... as "doing despite to the spirit of Grace":
See that sin?
That is....>rejected Christ and died never born again.
You can find them in Hebrews and in Acts 28:28, as its the same group.
That's the unpardonable sin..they are committing.... .as you can't be pardoned in eternity if you reject Christ who is the Eternal Pardon.
Most Netflix shows are full of sex, lust, porn.
Most USA Christians, and many others watch Netflix and in fact pay every month to get more of it into their eyes and heart.
""Game of Thrones""", was a very erotic and sensually filthy show that most Christians watched for years.
So, its no mystery to God that when a "christian" is watching this type of " carnal product" they are not at the same time "living for the Lord and presenting their body as a living sacrifice to God".
Are they going to hell ?
No.
They are just very carnal christians.
Useless.
But they can often talk a game of theology, that is JUNK
Only God's forgiveness redeems you from being a Christ rejector.
So, to get that off of you, you have to trust in Christ and be forgiven by God... as that removes the wrath of God that every unbeliever is under, as you read this..
See, all unbelievers are currently DAMNED and are waiting to die and go to hell.
Salvation in Christ, takes that away..
That particular earthly Judgment, that is the Great Trib and the 2nd Advent, found... is :
2 Thessalonians 1-8-9.
"there are none good, no not one"
why?
Because "all have sinned"..
So, here is how to see that..
Maybe as compared to me, you are good, but as compared to Christ.... you behavior is never good, no matter how good you think you are, at any time..
And if you think that your "giving to the poor,, and trying not to lie..... and sitting in the front pew,.... and trying to be some imitation of Christ... is proof you are good, then just compare it to Jesus who is The Holiness of God that makes the sun seem like an iceberg with regards to HEAT.
See, when God burned the Homosexual in Sodom & Gomorrah, its described as fire and brimstone, as that is how its DESCRIBED by a human under inspiration of the Spirit, who is trying to describe it with WORDS>
What was it really? ??
God simply allowed His Holiness to touch them in a way that was wrath.
Believers often dont realize that God is not just Love....but God is HOLY.
Right now... today, tomorrow...You can go to sodom and gomorrah , and see the BLACK ASH in the rock, where the heat of God's Holiness scorched their sodomy and perversion completely away.
"its a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God" as a Christ Rejector, most of all.
War is a form of dealing with sin and rebellion and unbelief.
War now and Hell later.
I'll be happy to read those books---I'm pretty sure I already read the 1st one. I emailed Robert Gundry, the author of "The Church and the Tribulation." It is one of two classic theological works on the Postrib view, exposing the Pretrib view.I was active with Campus Crusade in 1970-72 when rapture mania was in full bloom. I well-remember the Hal Lindsey nonsense. He had to do so much tap-dancing away from his ever-changing prophecies it became pathetic. We were assured in Crusade the rapture was right around the corner. JFK was being kept alive on Onassis' yacht and would be the beast whose seemingly mortal head wound was miraculously healed (the reference is actually to Nero, who was the subject of rumors at the time). I later listened to the entire Left Behind CD series, which was loaned to me by an atheist friend who found it fascinating strictly as science fiction!
I thought at the time all Christians believed in the rapture as taught by Crusade. If you happened to be flying an airplane or sitting on the toilet, no worries because all that would magically be taken care of. What???
The doctrine makes sense only from a Dispensationalist perspective, whereby it is the end of the Church Age and the ushering in of the Millennial Kingdom when Israel is restored. I often listen to Jan Markell, whom I refer to around the house as the Rapture Lady, just because I find her obsession so bizarre it's entertaining: Home - Olive Tree Ministries I now believe rapture mania is mostly nonsense. If there is anything resembling a rapture, it will be at the one and only Second Coming. However, "coming on the clouds" was a common way of referring to divine manifestations, and I doubt seriously the Second Coming is going to be anything like the literalists picture.
The obsession with Revelation and the pre-trib/post-trib debate does not even enter into my thinking. You may know that post-trib thinking predominated before everything went to pot with the two World Wars, whereupon the notion that we were actually in the Millennium began to look a little silly. Voila, pre-trib took the stage.
For those who aren't familiar with them, the scholarly (but not excessively scholarly) "multi-view" books are invaluable to help think through these issues and to see what extremely different views first-class NT scholars can hold. These from the excellent Counterpoints series are all pertinent:
Four Views on the Book of Revelation Amazon.comThree Views on the Rapture: Pretribulation, Prewrath, or Posttribulation Amazon.comThree Views on the Millennium and Beyond Amazon.com
The "beginning" is the starting point of the physical Universe, not where He dwells. That first sentence is an introduction to what is created in Genesis 1-3 : earth, light, sun, moon, stars, botanicals, fish, insects, animals, Adam and Eve. Genesis does not speak of His residence - or do you think Elohim was just floating around in the all nothingness? Of course Spiritual Heaven existed prior to "the beginning". Eternity has no beginning.“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” The use of the term “beginning” indicates that it has a “starting point”…here referring to the creation of the “heavens and earth.” Ok…so if it has a “starting point”…how can it be eternal...which has no beginning or ending? If it is not eternal…then just as sure as it has a “beginning…it has an ending”...agree?
So if He is far above the heavens (that we physically see), then He logically traveled beyond His physical creation. Where? Where the Father and angels are.He who descended is Himself also He who ascended far above all the heavens, so that He might fill all things.)” Ephesians 4:10 NASB
Well, the Bible only reveals so much. There are mysteries. We know in part.let’s not turn it once again into a mystery
Well, the way you express yourself sometimes, may seem clear to you, but is conflicting:I have never said to you or anyone I know…that we are “Jesus” as it would seem you are insinuating Ronald…is that you’re regularly encountered gift of “suspicion” at work again? You really need to look at that…wh
We have been born again, spiritually resurrected yet we did not physically die nor have we received a new resurrected eternal body like Jesus has [speaking of our "in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet" change.]For if we have become united with Him in the likeness of His death, [Speaking of our on the earth new birth experience] certainly we shall also be in the likeness of His resurrection, [Speaking of our on the earth new birth experience] (6) knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him [Speaking of our on the earth new birth experience] in order that our body of sin might be done away with, [Speaking of our on the earth new birth experience] so that we would no longer be slaves to sin; [In this life…as a result of our on the earth new birth experience] (7) for he who has died is freed from sin.” [In this life…as a result of our on the earth new birth experience] Rom 6:5-7 NASB
We are "no different" in the act of sin. If we do the same as a non- believer who lies, steals, covets or chooses not to love someone in need, isn't it still a sin for us? We are sinners - who have been forgiven because we believe in Christ. John MacArthur quote above is applicable to this. We are a work in progress with flaws - saved though.How is it you say “we are freed from the bondage of sin”…and that “we don’t practice it” (sin)…then allude to the idea that we are “no different” in our failure than those given to the bondage of sin?
I like your first sentence..."The "beginning" is the starting point of the physical Universe, not where He dwells." Yeh...that is what I am saying...creation is called creation because it "was not and then it was"...it was created? Is God created...no way...God is outside of creation...clearly...as you have stated...but it says that the "heavens and the earth" were created designating their beginning.The "beginning" is the starting point of the physical Universe, not where He dwells. That first sentence is an introduction to what is created in Genesis 1-3 : earth, light, sun, moon, stars, botanicals, fish, insects, animals, Adam and Eve.
It may speak of His residence...let's look...I don't think it was nothingness Ronald...may seem like it...and I can see why you ask...there is actually a lot to the deconstruction of Genesis 1:2.Genesis does not speak of His residence - or do you think Elohim was just floating around in the all nothingness?
This is serious error."in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed."
1 Cor. 15:52 ( same event in1 Thes. 4:16-17).
Without form and void means just like a lump of clay with no life. Look at any of the other planets. They are round; but there's nothing really interesting about them, void. Then think of all the beauty on the earth. Quite a masterful design, from without form (design) and void to what we see today. He is just telling us He started with a crude lump of elements, water, then formed it.Thank you R.D. Bruno for taking the time to read me...we are working something here bro...the Lord is moving I guarantee it...keep'er moving...were doing great!
I like your first sentence..."The "beginning" is the starting point of the physical Universe, not where He dwells." Yeh...that is what I am saying...creation is called creation because it "was not and then it was"...it was created? Is God created...no way...God is outside of creation...clearly...as you have stated...but it says that the "heavens and the earth" were created designating their beginning.
So technically there was no "heavens or earth" until they were created in the beginning. Yet the eternal God surely existed? There was something before creation..."The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters."
It may speak of His residence...let's look...I don't think it was nothingness Ronald...may seem like it...and I can see why you ask...there is actually a lot to the deconstruction of Genesis 1:2.
The "earth was formless and void" so perhaps...not in place or formed at that point yet...not really existent perhaps? It had no observable form and there was nothing to or on it...just existing in the "thought" of eternity Himself...as He related it to Moses...perhaps?
"Darkness was over the surface of the deep"...so it is like a "veil" over the "surface" of the "deep"...it does not say that the "deep" was darkness...but rather that the deep was "veiled" or in someway "cover/hidden." Like the veil on Moses face when coming down from the the summit of Sinai?
Then it says..."the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters"...so it would seem safe to say that it was something vs nothingness...God as eternity...and without a doubt His intention that would be coming forth in His desire...moving on the surface of the waters...perhaps we can define "waters?" Because what ever it was/is...it has the Spirit of God "Moving over it." Sometimes the "Word" is referred to as water?
My answer to your great question...Ronald...I am sensing that the God of eternity was never just nothing...without form or void...He was absolutely SOMETHING eternal...and He was outside of anything called "heaven or earth" my brother. He framed creation to bring forth His desire...however the immensity of the eternal God Himself could never be contained within His creation...right?
Perhaps that is why He desired to incarnate as a man...as His Spirit...then He could come into His creation? The Lord Yahshua Christ?
Redd...:)