Not at all. They get it from the scriptures. No need for man made councils as are required by the trinity.It varies from person to person... :)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Not at all. They get it from the scriptures. No need for man made councils as are required by the trinity.It varies from person to person... :)
Wrangler: Nothing you quoted is remotely is like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal.
PinSeeker: Far be it from me to deprive you of your opinion, Wrangler.
It's as far from an opinion as one can get!
Truly, truly, I say to you... :)... as I have you and several others before, the word 'trinity' is not in the Bible, but the triune nature and existence of God in Person(s) and purpose most assuredly is. And I'm perfectly okay with you calling that my opinion, but it is what it is. Again, my Lord and God is very clear in John 14 in particular (but throughout John's gospel, immediately speaking):The trinity is not in the Bible. Simple fact.
Call it what you like; it is what it is.Only by inventing an amazing Strawman argument with artificial synthesis can you attempt to make it appear that the opposite is true.
Well, I would agree with that statement, of course, but that was never an actual quote of mine. I would also say that if you just picked that one sentence out of a larger quote ~ if you create a vacuum, which you probably did ~ the accusation of "avoiding explicit standards" is easy to level, but holds no water. I have been very specific, citing so many Scriptures that... well, frankly, I've lost count. Not that I was ever really keeping count, but still... And the silence with regard to alternative readings or understandings ~ except for mere denial, the one regarding 1 Corinthians 8:6 in this thread (and others) being a case in point ~ has been absolutely deafening.I've heard things like 'everything in Scripture points to the trinity.' Way to avoid explicit standards!
Some think they do, sure. They lean on their own understanding, which God (through Solomon, son of David, king of Israel, in his Proverbs) exhorts us not to do and which is one variation among persons. :)Wrangler: Just where do you suppose non-trinitarians get indoctrinated?
PinSeeker: It varies from person to person... :)
Not at all. They get it from the scriptures.
God uses many things in His perfect Counsel, even the counsel of man. The whole Counsel of God ~ the Bible ~ is a testament to that fact, from the books of Moses (the Pentateuch) to John's Revelation. And teaching, as you should know, is a gift of the Holy Spirit (Romans 12, 1 Corinthians 12), and the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable (Romans 11).No need for man made councils as are required by the trinity.
Some think they do, sure. They lean on their own understanding, which God (through Solomon in his Proverbs) exhorts us not to do and which is one variation among persons. :)
Hey! You might notice what I did there in that later sentence, and correlate it to what I said previously regarding 1 Corinthians 8:6. I bolded a couple of things ~ notice particularly the 'and' (correlative conjunction) ~ for you to assist... :)
A pat on the back for cutting and pasting some diagram? I wouldn't break out the champagne too soon if I were you. :)Sorry, I don't mean to pat myself on the back for my sentence building and diagramming prowess... :)... but I do admittedly take some pleasure in that... :)... for which I repent in dust and ashes... :)
I wonder why the Bible would say it contains all things that pertain to life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3) if God had to use councils replete with Plato loving men to define the doctrine.God uses many things in His perfect Counsel, even the counsel of man. The whole Counsel of God ~ the Bible ~ is a testament to that fact, from the books of Moses (the Pentateuch) to John's Revelation. And teaching, as you should know, is a gift of the Holy Spirit (Romans 12, 1 Corinthians 12), and the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable (Romans 11).
Grace and peace to you, Rich.
Rest assured that we return, in full ~ but with all due respect ~ that same statement to you and your like-minded cohorts here, Aunty Jane.you have been horribly misled by the greatest liar in existence.
Trinitarians would wholeheartedly agree with this particular statement; I know I do... But here, actually, you're even contradicting your own understanding of our understanding of the triune Godhead. Surely you understand that: If we say that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal, we are not, even by what should be your own admission, putting any member of the triune Jehovah before any other.To put any other "gods" in the Father's place is a clear breach of the first Commandment.
Not at all. See immediately above. You're statement here is a horrible caricature and misstatement of the trinitarian position.Christendom has two "gods" that it has put in the Father's place, claiming 'co-eternity and co-equality with one who has no equal.
Sure, and as a man having fully humbled Himself and laid aside for a time His position with the Father, was our perfect model in glorifying God.Jesus... was happy to be his Father's servant. (Acts 4:27)
In your opinion. Again, returned in full. Although I would disagree on the "every point" thing; there are things we would agree on... :)You fail on every point...
Regarding the nature of God. Right. But if the Spirit changes your heart, be sure and let us know, and we will rejoice with you. :)...I know you will not believe what we say...
He... already has... :)Jesus will soon tell us all whether we were on the right road or not.
Um, I think you mean John 17. In John 14, Jesus is conversing with His disciples.PinSeeker: Again, my Lord and God is very clear in John 14 in particular (but throughout John's gospel, immediately speaking)
John 14 is Jesus praying to God. So you really mean to say that one person talking to another person means they are one and the same entity? That one person asking another person to send something means all three are the same entity?
Well now you are parsing words, Rich, as if in a vacuum, which is very much along the lines of what I said to Wrangler regarding what he did shortly ago. It's a very common thread among you.You and I are Christians. Notice I used the word and in bold. That proves we are actually the same person?
I gave an example of what a true diagram of 1 Corinthians 8:6 would look like in some fashion, which I was very clear in saying, Rich. So now you're changing what I did and said into something that it explicitly was not, and therefore terribly dishonest. Which, again, is a common thread in all these discussions, not only with you but with your like-minded cohorts here.A pat on the back for cutting and pasting some diagram?
Your mind is your own, and as such, I cannot be concerned with your "wonderings." :)I wonder why the Bible would say it contains all things that pertain to life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3) if God had to use councils replete with Plato loving men to define the doctrine.
John 14 is Jesus praying to God. So you really mean to say that one person talking to another person means they are one and the same entity? That one person asking another person to send something means all three are the same entity?
Pinseeker is so funny! He just makes things up as he goes AND fully believes it.You and I are Christians. Notice I used the word and in bold. That proves we are actually the same person?
That is a NO! to every single point of misinterpreted scripture...and repeating your tired rhetoric over and over is tedious.
No, I'm sorry, it is just the opposite...
1 Corinthians 8:5-6...NKJV...
"For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as there are many gods and many lords), 6 yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live."
That is a clear and unequivocal statement.....the apostles collectively identified their "one God" as "the Father", and their "one Lord" as "Jesus Christ".
You can try to make that mean something else, but it would be a manipulation of the truth.
No again.....that is a mistranslation....
"προσδεχόμενοι awaiting τὴν the μακαρίαν happy ἐλπίδα hope καὶ and ἐπιφάνειαν manifestation τῆς of the δόξης glory τοῦ of the μεγάλου great θεοῦ God καὶ and σωτῆρος of Savior ἡμῶν of us Χριστοῦ of Christ Ἰησοῦ, Jesus". (Interlinear)
The Greek phrasing reads differently to the English. "The great God AND the Savior of us, of Christ Jesus". There are two persons in that statement....and the third is invariably missing.
Anyway... No, Rich, three distinct Persons ~ so Jesus can certainly converse with and pray to the Father ~ but one in substance. So He can (and does in John 17:5) claim for Himself the glory that He possessed ~ and call upon the Father to glorify Him ~ with the full glory of of God, from eternity past and throughout the age to come. As Jesus says, He is in the Father, and the Father is in Him. The Holy Spirit shares intimately in that oneness.
Funny that you should bring up twisting other people's words. But, judging from your posts, I guess you're a pro at it so you would notice.Well now you are parsing words, Rich, as if in a vacuum, which is very much along the lines of what I said to Wrangler regarding what he did shortly ago. It's a very common thread among you.
I gave an example of what a true diagram of 1 Corinthians 8:6 would look like in some fashion, which I was very clear in saying, Rich. So now you're changing what I did and said into something that it explicitly was not, and therefore terribly dishonest. Which, again, is a common thread in all these discussions, not only with you but with your like-minded cohorts here.
Not required. I just wonder about things like most people. You?Your mind is your own, and as such, I cannot be concerned with your "wonderings." :)
He's a good word twister to be sure.Pinseeker is so funny! He just makes things up as he goes AND fully believes it.
I Love too how he uses fancy words AS IF that solidifies his abuse of language usage is valid.
But to us there is but one President, Joe Biden, who is the leader and one Vice President, Kamala Harris, who is second in command.Some think they do, sure. They lean on their own understanding, which God (through Solomon, son of David, king of Israel, in his Proverbs) exhorts us not to do and which is one variation among persons. :)
Hey! You might notice what I did there in that later sentence, and correlate it to what I said previously regarding 1 Corinthians 8:6. I bolded a couple of things ~ notice particularly the 'and' (correlative conjunction) ~ for you to assist... :)
Sorry, I don't mean to pat myself on the back for my sentence building and diagramming prowess... :)... but I do admittedly take some pleasure in that... :)... for which I repent in dust and ashes... :)
God uses many things in His perfect Counsel, even the counsel of man. The whole Counsel of God ~ the Bible ~ is a testament to that fact, from the books of Moses (the Pentateuch) to John's Revelation. And teaching, as you should know, is a gift of the Holy Spirit (Romans 12, 1 Corinthians 12), and the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable (Romans 11).
Grace and peace to you, Rich.
I do credit myself, humbly, with having a pretty good sense of humor, yes. :)Pinseeker is so funny!
Again, far be it from me to deprive you of your opinion, even concerning me. It bothers me not; so many Scriptures I have quoted verbatim, so I can't be accused of making things up with any modicum of validity whatsoever. But yes, what I say I certainly believe... :)He just makes things up as he goes AND fully believes it.
Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, pot. :) Regardless, it is what it is; things are what they are (and are not what they are not).I Love too how he uses fancy words AS IF that solidifies his abuse of language usage is valid.
No... :) You're wrangling, too, Rich. At one time, I would have been surprised at that, but no more...So God has gone from a personal entity to a thing, an essence?![]()
Well, I can see how that might a be hurtful implication when applied to you. It is certainly not my intention to be hurtful, to you or anyone else. Having said that, I... don't think I can say the same from at least some among you and your cohorts here, but, everyone is who he/she is. But, I give you credit for not denying your twisting. :)Funny that you should bring up twisting other people's words.
Yeah, I've been questioning your judgment for quite some time now, and here again... :)...judging from your posts, I guess you're a pro at it so you would notice.
Sure. But some things are blatantly evident, and no wondering is necessary. But I think we're talking past each other here...Not required. I just wonder about things like most people. You?
You may think (or think you know) that I'm mistaken about some things, Rich, but I twist no person's (or Person's) words (Word). Well, except to "twist back," so to speak, to what they truly are, in response to their having been twisted into something they are not.He's a good word twister to be sure.
I mean, now we're talking about earthly things and comparing/applying them to the supernatural, which is quite the problem, as I said. But Joe and Kamala do, together, make up the one Executive Branch of our representative republic, no? :)But to us there is but one President, Joe Biden, who is the leader and one Vice President, Kamala Harris, who is second in command.
Well, they do aim to be unified in purpose... :) A couple of Scriptural things come to mind, though:Know anybody who thinks Joe and Kamala are one "essence?"
but one in substance.
Sure you can! This is because none of the Scripture you quoted say anything like the trinity doctrine, The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever. If there were such a verse, you would not need to resort to artificial synthesis by invoking all these others and demanding they be interprettted the trinitarian way.It bothers me not; so many Scriptures I have quoted verbatim, so I can't be accused of making things up with any modicum of validity whatsoever.
Jesus saying all things are possible with God is figurative
Rich already listed about 5 things God cannot do according to Scripture. So, you again accept contradictions or must accept your literal interpretation is incorrect.If God can do that, and He did, and its true, then truly all things are possible
As in being "one" ala John 10:30? What a novel concept! :)Well, they (Biden & Harris) do aim to be unified in purpose...