I believe the AoD of Dan 9 and the AoD of the Olivet Discourse as the same. But that doesn't mean I think these are called "great tribulations." The term "Great Tribulation" I find in Dan 12.1 and also in the Olivet Discourse, referring to the final NT punishment of the Jewish People which began with the rise of Rome.
It also ends the rule of all nations, and is the period the angels pour out the vials etc. The waters are made into blood, every island moves,there are two witnesses who die and rise again, etc etc etc. It is a well defined and specific time that is coming, and cannot be confused with any other time.
That's why Daniel mentioned it right after speaking of the reign of Antiochus 4.
No. The evil leader of old was a forerunner and shadow of the final king to come, and was mentioned as a launching point into the future where the prophesy is about.
The Great Tribulation, according to Luke, is the NT punishment of the Jewish people, the longest punishment in their history.
Not true. Half of the seven years of the end is the great trib and Jesus said it started exactly when the abomination of desolation is set up. It has no relation to any long period anywhere.
I do agree that the reign of Antiochus 4 foreshadows the reign of Antichrist. But we can get this confused with two separate AoDs mentioned in the book of Daniel.
The confusion is thinking there are two different ones. Jesus said the one spoken of by Daniel, not 'one of the ones' spoken of by Daniel!
One is in Dan 9, and refers to the Roman conquest of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
No. The time specified in Dan 9 for the abominations is the wrath of God, the finishing of all things prophesied and the pouring out of the judgments decreed.
Daniel 9:27
"And he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week, but in the
middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of
abominations {will come} one who makes desolate, even
until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is
poured out on the one who makes desolate."
The one who makes desolate is the beast. Not God.
And the other refers to Antiochus 4. There is no AoD associated with the Antichrist.
No they both are about the very end. It is not hard to see looking at the passages. There are no duo abominations of desolations. Only one.
Paul's reference to the Man of Sin taking a seat in the temple of God may be figurative for his self-proclaimed deity, since Paul knew that the temple of Herod was soon to disappear from history.
That is fuzzy nonsense. The man of sin is a title of a specific man who also is known by other titles and names. The AntiChrist is the one known for proclaiming he is God.