Those Jews were vessels of wrath because they would not obey.
Absolutely not. That is an impossible conclusion to reach without refuting what Paul says in that very passage, that He has mercy on whomever He wills, and He hardens whomever He wills... is thus the Mold
er and we are the mold
ed, is thus the potter and we the clay... that some are prepared for destruction and others prepared beforehand for glory.
the verse says God is "long suffering" with those vessels of wrath...
Sure, He could have not created them at all and thus not had to endure them at all, much less with patience (grace).
Peter and Paul agree that the long suffering of God is salvation (2 Peter 3:15).
Sure, but His patience toward believers and unbelievers are not toward the same end. His patience toward believers is because of His perfect faithfulness and results in salvation and ultimately resurrecting them to eternal life, but His patience toward believers is a grace for a time (while they live) but ultimately ends in their being resurrected to judgment.
Romans 9 is not a discourse on Calvinism...
Of course not, because John Calvin only commented on Romans 9 (as well as the rest of Scripture) at least 1500 years after it was written. You know this. My goodness. But John Calvin was right about Romans 9. :)
Paul uses Jacob and Esau to prove God does not have to base His choices/promises on physical descent...
God can could have based His choices/promises on anything, I guess, but as I have said, God does everything He does for His own good pleasure and His glory.
...Paul in Romans 9 is proving God was just and right in casting off elect people the Jews.
Correct, but we have to understand who the Jews really are in God's economy. I think if you'll read back in Romans 2, particularly verse 28 and 29, and then ahead in Romans 11:25-26, you will see:
"For no one is a Jew who is merely one outwardly, nor is circumcision outward and physical. But a Jew is one inwardly, and circumcision is a matter of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter. His praise is not from man but from God" (2:28-29)
"Lest you be wise in your own sight, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And in this way all Israel will be saved..." (11:25-26)
...the choice of Abraham and not Melchizedek...
There was no such choice made. Melchizedek foreshadows Jesus, Who is a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek rather than after the order of the Levitical priesthood. We could say a lot about this, but this it a total tangent and a total misdirection on your part.
The Gentiles were not of the chosen/elect to receive the covenant of promise...
Not the Gentiles, per se, but God's Israel, true Jews, whose praise is from God, His elect, which includes both ethnic Jew and Gentile. people from every tongue, tribe, and nation.
...Romans 9 is about salvation not being based upon physical descent...
Right...
...but upon an obedient faith.
Nope. God's gracious choice. His sovereign choice regarding who He gives mercy/compassion to (and by inference whom he does not).
No Calvinism to be found at all in Rom 9 but very anti-Calvinistic.
Calvinism/Schmalvinism... What's true is true.
Ephesians 1:4-5 does not teach the Calvinistic idea of God unconditionally electing certain individuals before the world began to be saved.
Again, Calvinism/shmalvinism. Paul is very clear in these two verses (as if he's not clear in all passages of Scripture attributed to his hand):
"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, even as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before Him. In love He predestined us for adoption to Himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of His will..."
It is what it is. Any condition was based on Him and not on us.
The Bible teaches corporate election...
Yes, for sure; we are all one ~ those of us who God has had mercy/compassion on ~ in Christ Jesus. So this is all one corporate group, for sure, but we each make our own choices, so it's also individual. And to say even Paul is speaking only of the corporate is to take him out of his context, and not only him, but Moses also, whom Paul quotes (and Moses is quoting God): "'I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.' ... So then He has mercy on whomever He wills, and He hardens whomever He wills."
God foreknew a group that would be called "Christian" and those who use their free will to choose to be in this group make up the elect.
A group, but a group made up of individuals. See immediately above. :)
Anyway, ah, yes, the old "foreknew" misunderstanding. Romans 8:29 says "...those whom He foreknew He also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son." Yes, but let's think about this. Paul cannot mean "foreknew" in the sense that He knew what they would do beforehand, because in that sense, He foreknows everyone and everything. And the reason he cannot mean "foreknew" in this sense is that he it talking about a specific group of people that He foreknew. Secondly, that verb "knew" (cutting off the prefix "fore" for simplicity's sake) should be understood as it is meant in the Hebrew of the Old Testament (because that's where it's drawn from). We can find examples everywhere, but even in Genesis, where Adam knew Eve and Eve conceived a son (Genesis 4:1). Well of course Adam "knew who Eve was" ~ she was the only woman on earth at the time... :) ~ but rather than mere cognitive understanding, it is virtually synonymous with "loved." So coming back to Romans 8:29, we can actually read that verse as "...those He
foreloved." And the implication is the same, that God didn't ~ before the foundation of the world ~ love others in the same sovereign, distinguishing way as He did His elect.
What is 'unfathomable' is God predetermining men to do wickedness...
Well yes, that's entirely incorrect, and John Calvin (and thus no Calvinist worth his salt) did not (would not) even suggest such a thing. God is not the author of sin.
But then God punishing those men for the wickedness God forced upon them them to commit.
Yeah, He did no such thing. His grace is that He chooses to save
some ~ rather than no one ~ from the consequences of their sin. He would be perfectly just to leave
all in their sin, and thus no one would be saved.
All justly deserve His condemnation. But
some, in His sovereign, distinguishing love and mercy, are placed in Christ Jesus. And therefore for them, there is no more condemnation (Romans 8:1), and they therefore inherit eternal life. This is grace. This is the Gospel.
Grace and peace to you.