Timtofly
Well-Known Member
So you accept Paul when you think Paul says they need bodies? They don't need bodies. They already have them. Yet you don't think the rapture and Second Coming happen at the same time in those same verses where you think those currently in Paradise need bodies? Only those on earth need a new body. Those currently in Paradise have a permanent incorruptible physical body, per 2 Corinthians 5:1. All the dead have risen first and have been changed ongoing always before those still alive. That is not a future event. That is a constant ongoing reality for every generation is to assume they are the one's who will be alive.No. The folks in heaven are coming back to earth to have their bodies raised. What they need to wait for before that happens is for the trib to be over so all that will be martyred will be martyred. Then Jesus returns with the saints. For the Bride who was already raptured, we already have our new body. We had our body raised from the dead if we died before the Rapture, and our living bodies raised if we were still alive. If people are killed in the tribulation, they would not have had their dead bodies raised from the dead yet would they?
No one was waiting for 2,000 years to be that generation. Every single generation for the last 1992 years thought they were that soon Coming generation. No one taught: "ok around 1950, that will be the soon generation". Every single generation was the "soon" generation. Every generation was supposed to spread the gospel and be prepared for the Second Coming. That was the message from the OD. Especially after 70AD. There was no Jerusalem to have armies attacking it and the Jews. The Second Coming obviously did not happen where Jesus set up His earthly throne in Jerusalem.
For hundreds of years there was utter desolation on the temple site. It was not until a Muslim rebuilt Jerusalem and the walls and set up a mosque, did the city see life again. But it was not a fulfilment of any Scripture. Israel did not bloom until 1948. If there was any sign or fulfilment from the OD that was the first. Unless you claim the AoD was the rebuilding of Jerusalem by a Muslim during the dark ages and we have had hundreds of years of the greatest tribulation ever known to mankind and the Second Coming happened before the fig tree bloomed, you may want to look at Matthew 24:15-34 in a reverse order than Jesus gave. I think the AoD is the last event, then the GT, then the Second Coming, and the fig tree blooming is the first event in that order.
If the Second Coming happens before the fig tree blooming then that generation would have been born after the Second Coming. Jesus said some of the generation of the fig tree would live to see all those events mentioned, which means the fig tree comes first. Then the Second Coming happens after that in reverse order. The gospel being preached is still the last thing before the very end. But Jeus did not say by whom in Matthew's account. Revelation 14:6
"And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people,"
The church is not spreading the Gospel at this point. The church is gone. It is an angel tasked with the gospel at the very end. The rapture and Second Coming already happened. Matthew 13 explains Jesus and the angels are on earth sowing and reaping the wheat harvest. This is not the church. The church already left at the Second Coming when Jesus as Prince came to earth with His angels. So Jesus in Matthew 13, and John in Revelation 14 explains it is angels spreading the Gospel, not even the church. So the church is not here to the very end because the gospel does not end when the church ends. The Gospel does not stop. What stops is the church and the fulness of the Gentile harvest. The church will not see the AoD. The church will not see the GT. The church only sees the fig tree blooming, and the Second Coming. Those people in the first century did not see any of those events listed in Matthew 24. They did see the armies approaching in Luke's account. Luke 21:20-21 is the closest thing from the OD that we get concerning the first century. It even declares Jerusalem will be desolate.
"And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto."
This desolation was not the AoD. This was the hundreds of years Jerusalem was left desolate. Each Gospel gives bits and pieces of the OD. Mark even gives a slightly different order than Matthew does. That means the author could have arranged the events in a certain order even if Jesus actually gave them in a totally different arrangement in the actual spoken event. The Holy Spirit was also involved, to help in remembering, so it was not just one writers opinion of what what said over another writers opinion of what they remembered. The point is they were not all the exact same words nor necessarily in the exact same order Jesus gave. They were four different accounts since Revelation is also a version, that John did not just hear then, but was caught up and literally experienced the events in real time. I would think the order given in Revelation would be the correct order to measure the other 3 accounts against. That and what has actually happened in the historical record.
What we know is that Ezekiel's armies was not Rome of 70AD. So this Ezekiel war is not recorded in the Bible as being mentioned in the OD. We do know many fled in 66-67, when the Roman armies first advanced, so Luke was covered in the follow up to 70AD, but not necessarily 70AD itself. Then Preterist try to shoe horn the whole of the OD into that period, but would be wrong in doing so.
The point is that when a soul leaves earth, they can only do so by receiving a new permanent incorruptible physical body. The words "souls under the alter" is symbolic. It is not literal souls stuffed under a literal alter. They would not all fit, for one, if the alter was literal, even if a soul needed no space to begin with. A literal soul having form to fit under a literal alter is the issue. It is mixing metaphors. "Being killed" is just symbolic of passing from death into life. For some it is physical death. For others it is just change. That is why Paul says all will be changed, and not all will die, ie killed to enter eternal life. Paul points out all will be changed. John points out all will be killed. They both are the same point of instantly experiencing 2 Corinthians 5:1.
The only time literal souls waited and tasted death, was called "sleep" in the OT. David said, "Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil". This was called Abraham's bosom. At the Cross Abraham's bosom was emptied and all the OT redeemed left Abraham's bosom and physically entered Paradise. Matthew 27 shows they had a physical body. Not all came out of their graves in Jerusalem, but came out of their graves wherever they had left earth. Jerusalem was just one of many places on earth, and the only one mentioned. The church does not all have to travel to Jerusalem to be caught up at the Second Coming. They will be caught up all over the earth from where their physical location is. So Jerusalem was not the only location bodies came out of their graves. God will work the same way at the future event as what happened all over the earth in 30AD. There were OT redeemed buried all over the earth. Contrary to some popular opinion that the redeemed were only within 100 miles of Jerusalem, at all times, prior to the Gospel being spread by the NT church. Remember that at the Cross the soul was coming out of sheol into a body.