Neither of the words "abomination" or any of its derivatives, or "desolation" or any of its derivatives, appears in those verses.
Nor do any of those verses reference Matthew 24:15 or Luke 21:20.
Nor do Matthew 24:15 or Luke 21:20 reference any of the Isaiah verses.
Sorry for the length of this response and it will have to be sent in two installments. It is a cut / paste from my recent commentary on the Book of Daniel. I only ask that you consider this..... Further, although it is not mentioned below, I believe you might agree that 9:24- 27 speask of the coming Messiah and being cut-off in the middle of the week. The Messiah will fulfill the types and shadows of the Leveitical ceremony during the Passover festival: He will be our High Priest, our Temple, our Sanctuary, our Passover Lamb, and of course His death would do away with all of those physical elements mentioned above as well as the daily sacrifices and offerings. And most importantly, the Messiah could NOT accomplish any of these things unless He was pure and cleansed of sin - no different than the High Priest, the Temple, etc., before they could conduct the Passover feast. Meaning, the Messiah must honor those exact same Levitical rituals necessary to be deemed "clear or pure" found in Leviticus. To be FOUND ANYTHING OTHER THAN CLEANSED, THE PASSOVER FEAST, THE TEMPLE, ETC., COULD NOT TAKE PLACE === THEY WOULD BE DECLARED "UNCLEAN."
And this is where the term "abominable" comes from as it relates to Jesus. When Jesus took on the sin of the world, He would no longer be "clean or pure." According to the definition in Leviticus He would be and unclean thing -an "abomination." No unclean thing can be found within the Sanctuary, Temple, etc.
Part 1.
27c-And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate, even until the consummation, which is determined, is poured out on the desolate
There are a few important terms within 27c that must be unpacked before this prophecy can be understood:
1. the "abomination that causes desolation."
2. the term "desolation."
3. the term "consummation."
4. “poured out on the desolate.”
The "abomination that causes desolation"
Among the many theories that have been offered, interpretations often center on the physical destruction of the Temple. These varied theories, spanning different time periods, associate the "Temple" with several key events: the Temple's destruction in 70 AD, the defilement during the time of Antiochus Epiphanes about 200 years earlier, or the anticipated destruction of a supposedly rebuilt Temple 2000 years in the future. However, it is important to understand that this phrase does not pertain to the physical destruction of the Temple, regardless of the time period in question. Instead, the focus should be on the deeper spiritual implications and the fulfillment of the prophecy through the Messiah's redemptive work.
A widely accepted interpretation involves the Jesuits' seven-year tribulation theory, or gap theory, which projects the last week of Daniel’s seventy-weeks-of-years prophecy about 2000 years into the future. Within this framework, the "one who makes desolate" is misidentified as a mythical anti-Christ figure that has yet to come. However, the Book of Daniel, particularly the messianic prophecies in Chapter 9, focuses on the coming Messiah and His plan of salvation for the Jews and all of humanity. But the Messiah has been completely overlooked – The death and crucifixion of Jesus is the “abomination that will cause desolation.” You just cannot miss him—that is, unless you want to!
Verse 27c speaks about the Messiah. He is the "One" who will cause .. The "abomination or transgression that causes desolation" is the cross; it is the crucifixion that will cause this complete "desolation."
The crucifixion of Jesus, the Messiah, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, is a profoundly tragic and significant event in the history of humanity. This is the true meaning of the “abomination that causes desolation.”
It represents an act of immense sorrow and gravity, surpassing any act of disobedience, transgression, or iniquity that the Jews or humanity could ever commit against their God. It stands as a powerful reminder of the ultimate sacrifice and the depths of human frailty. Can there be a greater injustice, a more evil act, or a more horrendous definition of an "abomination"?
Limiting our interpretation of this profound term to the destruction of a physical building, especially one that fulfilled its purpose at the cross, is a significant oversight. The term cannot refer to a building or even a city, regardless of its holiness. Both were destroyed by Babylon, so their destruction cannot fully embody the meaning of the abomination that causes desolation. Instead, it is the crucifixion of the Messiah that represents the ultimate abomination, signifying a deep desolation by impacting the connection between the Jews and their God through an incredibly unjust act.
It is the literal act (the cross) that causes the spiritual desolation between the Jews and their God.
The physical structures have been done away with; they have fulfilled their God-given mission.
Here are three verses in the New Testament that speak directly to Daniel 9:27c (should you accept it):
Matthew 24:15,
15Therefore when you see the ‘abomination of desolation,’ spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (whoever reads, let him understand,)
Mark 13:14, 14But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,)
Luke 21:20,
20But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is near.
Matthew 24:15 and Mark 13:14 both speak of the “abomination of desolation,” but there is a very noticeable difference between the two, while Luke does not mention this phrase. Rather, he speaks to the desolation of physical things, and the timing of the desolation that will come upon the Jews.
Matthew 24:15.…. “standing in the holy place.”
Mark 13:14……… “standing where it ought not.”
Luke 21:20………. “but when you see Jerusalem.”
These three verses are meant to send their own unique message as well as confirm the timing and identity of the abomination that causes desolation.
In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus refers to the "abomination that causes desolation" standing in the holy place (Matthew 24:15). This phrase is often interpreted literally, suggesting someone physically standing in the holy place, but some 2000 years in the future. Given the context of Matthew's Gospel, which was written specifically for a Jewish audience, this interpretation carries deep significance. Matthew’s aim was to affirm to his Jewish readers that Jesus was indeed the Messiah, their King, and their High Priest. Therefore, it is entirely fitting to understand Jesus, the Messiah, standing in the holy place. This aligns with His role and mission, confirming His divine authority and presence in the Temple, and His legitimate claim as the Anointed One. It underscores His fulfillment of the sacrificial system and the establishment of a new covenant. His crucifixion can be seen as the most grievous act in history, leading to a period of desolation with His people for the next 2000 years. This interpretation connects His physical presence in the Temple with the ultimate sacrifice He made on the cross, highlighting the profound spiritual implications of His mission.
In the Gospel of Mark, the portrayal of Jesus as the Suffering Servant is central to the narrative. Mark's audience, primarily Gentile Christians, would resonate with the depiction of Jesus as one who came to serve and suffer for humanity. This perspective influences the interpretation of the "abomination that causes desolation" differently than in Matthew's Gospel. While Matthew’s Gospel positions Jesus in the holy place to highlight His role as the Messiah and High Priest, Mark’s focus on Jesus as the Suffering Servant shifts the emphasis away from a literal presence in the Temple. A servant, even the Suffering Servant, would not typically be found in the holy place, that is not where servants belong. But Jesus would indeed be found there.
Mark underscores Jesus's mission and actions as a servant who fulfills God’s will through His suffering and service to humanity.
This perspective sees the betrayal and crucifixion of Jesus, the Suffering Servant, as the ultimate rejection, leading to spiritual desolation. Therefore, in Mark’s narrative, the holy place is not just a physical location but symbolizes the sacred mission of Jesus. His service, suffering, and sacrifice are the true holy actions that fulfill the prophecy, highlighting the profound spiritual implications of His mission.
In the Gospel of Luke, Jesus's life is presented in a chronological order, highlighting His identity as the Son of Man and His mission to bring redemption to humanity. Luke carefully traces Jesus's genealogy back to Adam, emphasizing His deep connection with all people and His role as the ultimate redeemer. Throughout Luke's narrative, Jesus's dual nature as both fully human and divine is emphasized. While He embodies complete humanity, Luke also portrays Him as the divine Messiah through His teachings, miracles, and fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies.