Davidpt
Well-Known Member
Based on what you’re saying it appears to me that a person who holds a Premil view has to also believe that salvation can be lost. Would you agree with that assessment?
That has nothing to do with Premil. There are some Premils that believe only OSAS is Biblical and that NOSAS isn't. And there are some Premils that believe both are Biblical. The same is true of Amils and probably Preterists as well. NOSAS has zero to do with Eschatology positions. But I will say this, though. It makes zero sense that one can be Amil while agreeing that NOSAS is Biblical since NOSAS contradicts Amil's interpretation of the first resurrection. Yet there are some that insist both Amil and NOSAS are Biblical. Except it is impossible that once someone has part in the first resurrection that they can somehow lose part in, thus be cast into the LOF instead. That's exactly what Amil and NOSAS teach.
But anyone reading Revelation 20:6 can plainly see that once anyone has part in the first resurrection they never lose part in it. Yet NOSAS is Biblical. It presents no problem for Premil because the first resurrection isn't meaning a spiritual resurrection that takes place millions of times per this age, it is a bodily resurrection that only takes place when Christ returns. Obviously, once someone puts on bodily immortality when Christ returns, thus the first resurrection, they can't then lose that resurrection somehow. Per Amil they can since Amil interprets the first resurrection to be involving initially being saved. NOSAS means to lose one's salvation.
Per Premil anyone that falls away, thus NOSAS, are then never part of the first resurruction to begin with. Therefore, they obviously can't lose part in the first resurrection because they already fell away before the first resurrection even occurs. Per Amil though, they already have part in the first resurrection before they fall away, thus if they fall away they lose having part in the first resurrection. Which then contradicts Revelation 20:6 since not one person who has part in the first resurrection is going to end up in the LOF instead. But that is what Amil and NOSAS teaches. If Amil was the correct position every single Amil would be of the OSAS camp and that NOSAS would not be Biblical. Except NOSAS is Biblical. So even if every single Amil were of the OSAS camp it still wouldn't make that the correct position since NOSAS is Biblical. IOW, NOSAS and Amil are not compatible with each other. Only OSAS and Amil are compatible with each other, except NOSAS is Biblical which then throws a monkey wrench into it, so to speak.
Last edited: