EclipseEventSigns
Member
You don't understand the conversation. Don't interrupt the conversation if you haven't read the thread.Again - it was ONE of the documents they used in the KJV translation. So???
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You don't understand the conversation. Don't interrupt the conversation if you haven't read the thread.Again - it was ONE of the documents they used in the KJV translation. So???
I am not surprised.It's hard to determine anything you believe. It's all gobbledegook and verbal diarhea.
MY KJV mindset? Mine? I categorically reject KJV onlyism completely. You obviously did not read the thread at all.I've read much of it. Your KJV only mindset throws a wrench in everything. The KJV was completed in 1611 – almost a century after Erasmus composed his first edition of the Textus Receptus in 1516.
Sorry, I mistook you for the burner on the KJV only-ism.
Referencing Zech. 4:14, you might want to view my understanding of the two witnesses in page #16, post #308.Enoch and Elijah;
The Bible says...it is appointed unto man once to die.
Neither have died a physical death.......i am inclined to conclude.
I did and considered the anointed point.Referencing Zech. 4:14, you might want to view my understanding of the two witnesses in page #16, post #308.
As for Moses, Enoch, Elijah or any other worthy Saint, who were supposedly at Jesus' transfiguration, you might want to consider that Jesus did say exactly what the disciples WOULD SEE.
John 1
[51] And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.
EDIT: moving forward to Rev. 11[3] And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.
No one ever stops to think that the book of Rev. is not all future. It's about the past, present and the future.
Only God, from His Eternity, is able to think in the past, present and the future, all at the same time. Therefore, we must be willing to entertain the three manifestations of Jesus.
1. In the flesh (birth).
2. In His Spirit (Pentecost, to this day).
3. In the Glory of His Immortality (His return).
The first manifestation of Jesus was kept secret by God from the foundation of the world.
As a result, when God prophesied through the OT prophets, none of them knew in which of Jesus' three manifestations their words would be fulfilled. Today, we can readily perceive and know by God's Holy Spirit, that which is fulfilled, is being fulfilled, and what shall be fulfilled.
No one ever stops to think that the book of Rev. is not all future. It's about the past, present and the future.
Only God, from His Eternity, is able to think in the past, present and the future, all at the same time. Therefore, we must be willing to entertain the three manifestations of Jesus.
1. In the flesh (birth).
2. In His Spirit (Pentecost, to this day).
3. In the Glory of His Immortality (His return).
As a result, when God prophesied through the OT prophets, none of them knew in which of Jesus' three manifestations their words would be fulfilled. Today, we can readily perceive and know by God's Holy Spirit, that which is fulfilled, is being fulfilled, and what shall be fulfilled.
The two prophets are killed and Jesus is immortal so he cannot be one of them plus the two prophets arrive long before the second coming so additional proof Jesus isn't one of them.
Evidently, you don't agree that the book of Rev. (written 96 AD.) speaks of the past, present and future, even though you say the majority of people know that.The overwhelming majority of people know that. It's never been "no one" or remotely close to that.
Evidently, you don't agree that the book of Rev. (written 96 AD.) speaks of the past, present and future, even though you say the majority of people know that.
When Jesus, being one of the two witnesses was crucified, he was mortal at that time.
In case you hadn't noticed, in regards to the prophecies of the prophets in the OT., none of them were physically manifested 100% verbatim, and often were in a large degree to be understood spiritually.No, it's only evident you aren't reading what was posted correctly.
The two prophets are killed together, lay together dead for 3.5 days then resurrect together. That doesn't match John and Jesus who died years apart and did not lay dead in the streets of Jerusalem for days. Why in the world would you disregard all those facts for this ridiculous interpretation that doesn't match Rev 11 at all?
In case you hadn't noticed, in regards to the prophecies of the prophets in the OT., none of them were physically manifested 100% verbatim, and often were in a large degree to be understood spiritually.
Earburner wrote in post #350:No, it's only evident you aren't reading what was posted correctly.
According to which of the three manifestations of Jesus? Are you SURE about your stand, in light of my (edited>)posts #346 and 355?That's no excuse for direct contradiction of prophecy. The death and reurrection of the two prophets does not match what you claim. They haven't died yet and that part of Rev 11 is still future unfulfilled prophecy.
That is thoroughly understood by Jesus' words, and also the Apostles words.The first manifestation of Jesus was kept secret by God from the foundation of the world.
The ministry of John the Baptist and Jesus was a joint ministry. Therefore, the 1260 days of their ministry is totaled: 6 months for John and 3 years for Jesus, equalling 1260 days, or 42 months or 3.5 years, which correctly fulfills the first half of the 70th week in Daniel 9 of when "Messiah is cut off" in the midst of the 70th week.No, it's only evident you aren't reading what was posted correctly.
The two prophets are killed together, lay together dead for 3.5 days then resurrect together. That doesn't match John and Jesus who died years apart and did not lay dead in the streets of Jerusalem for days. Why in the world would you disregard all those facts for this ridiculous interpretation that doesn't match Rev 11 at all?
They haven't died yet??That's no excuse for direct contradiction of prophecy. The death and reurrection of the two prophets does not match what you claim. They haven't died yet and that part of Rev 11 is still future unfulfilled prophecy.
You don't perceive it because "the wisdom of men" in/of church-ianity have set it up in the mind of our "natural man", that they are correct, and the teachings of "the mind of Christ", His Holy Spirit within us, is wrong.I did and considered the anointed point.
I fail to see any correlation of being anointed or not tied with the 2 witnesses.
Thank you but, I stay with scripture.You don't perceive it because "the wisdom of men" in/of church-ianity have set it up in the mind of our "natural man", that they are correct, and the teachings of "the mind of Christ", His Holy Spirit within us, is wrong.
KJV 1 Cor. 2:5, 12-14 (preferably, study all of 1 Cor. 2)
Edit: of all people in all generations , the only two witnesses that had the Holy Spirit anointing at birth, was John and Jesus.
Well, so did the Pharisees with their form of "wisdom of men". What went wrong with them, that caused them to MISS the day of THEIR visitation?Thank you but, I stay with scripture.