RLT63
Well-Known Member
Yes, Jesus was God in the flesh and he has a God. He is subservient to the FatherBelow is a non-responsive reply.
The question was does it make sense that God has a God. A simple yes or no answer please.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, Jesus was God in the flesh and he has a God. He is subservient to the FatherBelow is a non-responsive reply.
The question was does it make sense that God has a God. A simple yes or no answer please.
Not by the true formal definition. Trinitarians are naturally non-monotheistic in their doctrinesYou can be a monotheist and believe in the Trinity
Nonsense, and unbiblical of course.Yes, Jesus was God in the flesh and he has a God. He is subservient to the Father
It makes it harder to be one.You can be a monotheist and believe in the Trinity
I didn't mean the compound word.γενής
I had before the world was to be with you. The word order is changed. Check this post.I had with You before the world was.
Only if words have no meaning. 1. 3in1. Not the same.You can be a monotheist and believe in the Trinity
There is only one GodOnly if words have no meaning. 1. 3in1. Not the same.
I disagree with a lot of posters here….but, how many disagreed with Jesus?…..and disagreed enough to want to kill him. The religious leaders painted him as a fake Messiah who got his power from the devil.You disagree with the other poster who says Jesus is not the Word?
The Bible identifies only one God, the Father. This doesn’t jive with the 3-in-1 doctrine.Yes, Jesus was God in the flesh and he has a God. He is subservient to the Father
You have to ignore a number of scriptures like this one to reach that conclusionThe Bible identifies only one God, the Father. This doesn’t jive with the 3-in-1 doctrine.
Not by the true formal definition. Trinitarians are naturally non-monotheistic in their doctrines
Begotten means born as a man.I do believe that. But the question is, what does it mean for the Son to be "begotten" by (or of) God.
I'm a monotheist who believes Jesus is GodContradiction upon cintraduction
- I’m a monotheist who believes in the trinity.
- I’m a libertarian who believes in slavery.
- I’m an advocate of education who subscribes to the death penalty if anyone is caught reading - or teaching.
- I belief is science and believe transgender women can get pregnant.
- I accept definitions and an eternally begotten son.
Have you ever considered this Truth from God:Not by the true formal definition. Trinitarians are naturally non-monotheistic in their doctrines
Water can be liquid, solid or gas but it's still water.The Bible identifies only one God, the Father. This doesn’t jive with the 3-in-1 doctrine.
The son is a Unitarian ands said his Father would give out his Holy Spirit. The person conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit seems to be the son of a supernatural Father. You ignore the truth at your confusion.Have you ever considered this Truth from God:
a.) The FATHER is a Trinitarian
b.) The SON is a Trinitarian
c.) The HOLY SPIRIT is a Trinitarian
Since when is God himself a bunch of modes?Water can be liquid, solid or gas but it's still water.
There are three deities and their name is not God, they are Gods. God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Count em up!There is only one God
CORRECTThere are three deities and their name is not God, they are Gods. God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Count em up!