Wrangler
Well-Known Member
Acquired from his baptism. The same as us.If he was only a man then I’d agree...he was a man with the divine nature, ..
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Acquired from his baptism. The same as us.If he was only a man then I’d agree...he was a man with the divine nature, ..
Amen.....that means the written word (bible) witnesses to the veracity of the Spirit. And the Spirit is likewise a witness to the veracity of the written word (bible) too.The Bible confirms what the Spirit testifies to our spirit.
I don't think God's Word (you mean Scripture and nothing else here, right?) got it wrong. As I've said, I think Scripture is equivocal on the subject. Not incomplete (although it is -- but I digress), but equivocal. Big difference!Why do you think God’s Word got it wrong?
If the Early Church Fathers got it right to invent the doctrine of the trinity and the trinity is not in God’s Word, the only conclusion is the 66 books of the Bible got it wrong, incomplete at best.
Ignatius of Antioch (c. 35–107 AD)Why do you think God’s Word got it wrong?
If the Early Church Fathers got it right to invent the doctrine of the trinity and the trinity is not in God’s Word, the only conclusion is the 66 books of the Bible got it wrong, incomplete at best.
Wow!...Praise God for this divine heart revelation...Imo.Acquired from his baptism. The same as us.
Regarding doctrine; again, my experience lines up perfectly with @Ritajanice in that I get no confirmation of the inherently contradictory doctrine.
I concur @RedFan- but not equivocal on clear doctrines-the Cross, death and resurrection of Messiah is non-negotiable.I don't think God's Word (you mean Scripture and nothing else here, right?) got it wrong. As I've said, I think Scripture is equivocal on the subject. Not incomplete (although it is -- but I digress), but equivocal. Big difference!
If the Early Church Fathers got it right to invent the doctrine of the trinity and the trinity is not in God’s Word,
Let's do this @RedFan!Done. I suspect it wont be popular, because it requires a lot of reading and thought, but we'll see.
@Ritajanice WE AGREE = we need the Living Holy Spirit testifying of Gods truth to our spirit.Don’t agree, we need the Living Holy Spirit testifying of Gods truth to our spirit.
The Bible confirms what the Spirit testifies to our spirit.
There is only one way to be Born Again = by supernatural divine heart revelation.
Amen!
My belief differs.
We have the Living Holy Spirit, testifying to our spirit all day every day that we are Gods children.
Our spirit is reborn and it’s in the Spirit ...the Spirit is not Jesus it came from God.
Then who is the spirit?The Spirit testifies Of Jesus And God...he is Gods messenger, he is not God...he was sent by God, just as his penned word confirms.
He testifies to our spirit that we are Gods children.
He testified to my spirit that Jesus hung on a cross for my sin.
Jesus came to spread the good news.
The Holy Spirit testifies to our spirit when we become Born Again...who Jesus is and who God is..
All 3 are not one God..nonsense.
But we are not talking about God telling you where to goNot necessarily true. If God is telling @Ritajanice to go East and me to go West, we can both be hearing from God even though the messages are opposite.
Yet you both Claim Jesus is mere man, when not even Jesus said this of himself.Regarding doctrine; again, my experience lines up perfectly with @Ritajanice in that I get no confirmation of the inherently contradictory doctrine. Moreover, my entire religious walk reinforces true doctrine is divinely simple, too simple for many. People have to invent all this complicated doctrine and ritual.
WE are still learningIm still learning my lovely Brother in Christ.,@David in NJ
Praise God for my teacher / helper...the Holy Spirit.,
Since wrangler keeps bringing up post 148Compare and contrast why each side holds their doctrine important. The best answer I get from trinitarians is to not believe it is to not respect Jesus for who he really is. Again, if this were important, it would be in Scripture's 66 books. By contrast, the importance of Jesus NOT being God cannot be overstated for 3 basic reasons:
Trinitarians attempt to get around this by embracing dualism, which requires the abdication of logic; that he is this AND God. If Jesus were God, it means his resurrection is NOT the proof, our guarantee of like to follow, we have no mediator and we still owe the wages of our sin.
- Jesus is our ONLY mediator between us and God.
- Jesus resurrection is the first fruit, meaning like to follow.
- The wages of sin are only half paid. Trinitarianism denies our sins have been paid by the TOTAL sacrifice and death of the Son of God.
EXACTLY! Doctrines are from man. This explains why the trinity is not in Scripture.But we are not talking about God telling you where to go
we are talking about doctrines
See post 455..As I wrote in post #148, trinitarians have to ignore the reasons rejecting the trinity is important; first fruits.
Language usage: What does first imply? A series of like to follow.
If Jesus is not a man - and only a man - he is not the first fruit and his resurrection is not our proof of God’s plan for us.