- Aug 10, 2016
- 3,199
- 1,802
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- Australia
Well aware of what I see and said.
No.
It is of no matter to me, WHAT format, God “CHOSE” to reveal “HIS WORD”, in poetry, in ink on paper, in stone, in parables, in visions....SO WHAT?
Does HOW God Chose to reveal His Word, “matter to you”? WHY? Do you have some criticism, of HOW God reveals, “should have” been “according to you” ?
I am sorry. I am having a very hard time believing you are at all serious.
You. Don’t. Care. How God chose to reveal his word to us.
So. If God gives you poetry. You don’t care…you know better, you’ll take it literally.
If God gives you prophecy. You don’t care…you know better, you’ll take it literally.
If God gives you wisdom. You don’t care…you know better, you’ll take it literally.
If God gives you apocalyptic. You don’t care…you know better, you’ll take it literally.
Do you know where that leaves you?
Poetry - “The Lord is my Shepherd…”. Literally means you should expect to actually “lie down beside still waters”. That you must actually “walk through the valley of the shadow of death”…which is where, by the way? That you WILL fear no evil. Do you have NO fears?
Prophecy - “And I will turn you about and put hooks into your jaws…” Literally means waiting for an earthly leader to be dragged somewhere with a dirty great big hook in his jaw.
Wisdom - “Wisdom cries aloud in the street, in the markets she raises her voice…”. Literally means the attribute of ‘wisdom’ must now be personified as an actual woman.
Apocalyptic: “I saw a Lamb standing, as though it has been slain, with seven horns and with seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God..” Literally would demand that Christ is actually a Lamb with seven horns and seven eyes.
Now…if you REALLY don’t care HOW God has presented scripture to us, then you surely mustn’t care that the meanings clearly change when you take into account if you read them as they’re meant, or if you force ‘Literal’ interpretation onto them.
But…I suspect you do not actually read them that way. Thus I say you proclaim a hermeneutic you cannot uphold. You recognise, I suspect, that the Lamb REPRESENTS Christ. That ‘wisdom’ is being personified as a woman in order for the Holy Spirit, through Solomon, to make a piercing point about the attribute in question. You surely recognise that no world leader will be led out to battle with an actual hook, again it is symbolic. And David is using imagery to paint emotive responses to his Lord and how essential he is to his life, the ‘still waters’ being the inner peace God brings, the ability to walk through ‘the valley’ comes with the knowledge that our God is THE God, and that because of his promises to us, we can daily look our fears in the face because…what have we to fear?
Now…if you want to disagree with me and try and argue how you still don’t give a fig about HOW God presented his word, that it doesn’t change the interpretation and that you’ll still take all these things literally, I invite you to do so, but I do wonder how you’ll wiggle around the clearly different genres. I confess I might enjoy watching you try and explain all the metaphor and imagery all the while trying to call them ‘literal’.