THE CONFIRMING OF THE COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27

[TribulationSigns]

Wrong Biblical opinion!

The rest of your post is worthless. Being snarky and sarcastic won't lead you any closer to the truth. I have given my testimony, clarified your interpretation using Scripture, and shared a link to an article that addresses your question about the 69 weeks. There's nothing more I can do for you. As I've said many times, the Lord judges, and I am comfortable with it.

I will not continue discussing this topic, as my previous posts on this thread serve as a public record for anyone else who wishes to read and gain insight from them.

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

Is that the best you can do to respond?

Any response at all is better than your weak nonsense.

You mean spiritual discerned? Thank you.

Ah, so there it is. You think spiritual discernment means to interpret everything spiritually instead of literally or physically. No, that's not what spiritual discernment means. Having spiritual discernment means you can differentiate between literal and spiritual text. So, you clearly are lacking in spiritual discernment since you spiritualize everything. To the point where I wonder if you even acknowledge that Jesus was bodily raised from the dead. Do you?

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

The rest of your post is worthless. Being snarky and sarcastic won't lead you any closer to the truth.

Your false interpretations are worthless. And LOL at your hypocrisy. As if your LOLs and calling me "Boy" are not meant to be sarcastic? Get out of here with your hypocrisy, boy.

I have given my testimony, clarified your interpretation using Scripture, and shared a link to an article that addresses your question about the 69 weeks. There's nothing more I can do for you. As I've said many times, the Lord judges, and I am comfortable with it.

I will not continue discussing this topic, as my previous posts on this thread serve as a public record for anyone else who wishes to read and gain insight from them.

Yes, they are there for all here to laugh at.

 

[TribulationSigns]

Yes, they are there for all here to laugh at.

Not based on private messages I got from some members here. Sorry to disappoint you, but I am all good.

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

Not based on private messages I got from some members here. Sorry to disappoint you, but I am all good.

LOL. Sure, buddy. How many is "some"? One? And why are they not willing to post any public support for your nonsense? Hmmm?

 

[Davy]

Huh? Sigh...

Like I said, the events shown in the Daniel 9:27 verse DO NOT RELATE to the events in the 26th verse. And it is interesting that you tried to focus on the 25th verse, when I was pointing to the 26th verse of Daniel 9.

Dan 9:26
26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
KJV

There is NOTHING in the above 26th verse about the placing of the "abomination of desolation" IDOL at the temple that Lord Jesus warned about. Instead, that "prince that shall come" was the Roman general Titus whose army destroyed the 2nd temple and city of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. The temple burned down before Titus could get control of it, so NO "abomination of desolation" event happened. That above phrase in red ONLY... is about Christ Jesus in that above verse, and all it does is reveal that Christ would be crucified to end the 62nd week. The previous verse 25 "seven weeks" added to that 62nd week makes a total of 69 weeks, leaving the 70th week unfulfilled.


So what your brainwashed false doctrine of men that you follow, which tries... to claim the LIE that Christ's Ministry continued into the 70th week, is nothing but an influence by Satan's children of darkness.

And of course the unbelieving Jews hate the Jewish historian Josephus, because they claim those with him under siege that they all... chose to commit suicide, but Josephus was the last one left and he backed out. Yet Josephus is an important Jewish historian that lived around 100 A.D.

 

[covenantee]

So what your brainwashed false doctrine of men that you follow, which tries... to claim the LIE that Christ's Ministry continued into the 70th week, is nothing but an influence by Satan's children of darkness.

The lie and far worse is your heretically blasphemous attempt to contort Christ into antichrist, an abomination of desecration utterly alien to Scripture, grammar, history, and the united testimony of historical orthodox Christianity.

Your decapitated orphaned 70th week is a risible absurdity spawned in the demonic heresies of modernist dispensational futurism's fantasies and fallacies.

It is a travesty of Scripture's "more sure word of prophecy". 2 Peter 1:19

 

[TribulationSigns]

Like I said, the events shown in the Daniel 9:27 verse DO NOT RELATE to the events in the 26th verse. And it is interesting that you tried to focus on the 25th verse, when I was pointing to the 26th verse of Daniel 9.

Oh yes. Oh yes. Oh yes! Verses 26 and 27 are related by Messiah the Prince Himself! The 62 weeks ended in verse 26 and the final week began in verse 27. All by the Prince Himself. At the Cross. PERIOD! Case closed!

Dan 9:26
26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
KJV

There is NOTHING in the above 26th verse about the placing of the "abomination of desolation" IDOL at the temple that Lord Jesus warned about.

Well, duh, I never said this, so you must be mistaken with someone else.

Instead, that "prince that shall come" was the Roman general Titus whose army destroyed the 2nd temple and city of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. The temple burned down before Titus could get control of it, so NO "abomination of desolation" event happened.

[Yawn] More Titus nonsense coming from Preterism camps.

That above phrase in red ONLY... is about Christ Jesus in that above verse, and all it does is reveal that Christ would be crucified to end the 62nd week.

Thought so ;)

The previous verse 25 "seven weeks" added to that 62nd week makes a total of 69 weeks

Of course.

, leaving the 70th week unfulfilled.

Naturally, the 70th week began immediately after the completion of the 69 weeks. This final week extends from the time of the Cross until the Second Coming. During this period, the testimony of the Two Witnesses, which aligns with the Great Commission, comes to an end. At this point, sacrifices and the obligations for salvation has ceased. The apostasy has come upon the unfaithful corporate New Testament Church to the point of desolation, culminating in the Second Coming. This is what verse 27 pointed to. Nothing to do with Titus, 70AD or future antichrist with peace treaty with national Israel nonsense.

So what your brainwashed false doctrine of men that you follow, which tries... to claim the LIE that Christ's Ministry continued into the 70th week, is nothing but an influence by Satan's children of darkness.

Sounds fimiliar from someone I just had a debate with, humm.

And of course the unbelieving Jews hate the Jewish historian Josephus, because they claim those with him under siege that they all... chose to commit suicide, but Josephus was the last one left and he backed out. Yet Josephus is an important Jewish historian that lived around 100 A.D.

I won't listen to any more Josephus nonsense. He is not relevant to Daniel 9:24-27.

 

[Davy]

Oh yes. Oh yes. Oh yes! Verses 26 and 27 are related by Messiah the Prince Himself! The 62 weeks ended in verse 26 and the final week began in verse 27. All by the Prince Himself. At the Cross. PERIOD! Case closed!

Nope. The Daniel 9:26 and 27th verses are NOT linked to Jesus Christ regarding the end of this world. And Daniel 9:27 has absolutely nothing to do with Christ's Ministry at His 1st coming. That is where you have been following a doctrine of men.

HERE IS THE PROPER INTERPRETATION OF THE DANIEL 9:25-27 VERSES:

Dan 9:25-27
25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

"Messiah" is given as a noun in the above, and refers to the idea of a priest-king, and there is only One written of in God's Word that fits that priest-king role, Jesus Christ The Messiah (Ps.110:4; Zech.6:13; John 4:25). That word "Prince" above is Hebrew nagid, and can be translated as a ruler or leader or commander. But with the word "Messiah" as part of that declaration, it can only point to Jesus Christ, The Messiah.

Thus we are not... to confuse that word nagid (ruler) which is used later in the next Dan.9:26 verse as "prince" which is about the Roman ruler general Titus whose army destroyed Jerusalem and the temple in 70 A.D.


26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

Only that part above in 'red' is about Jesus Christ. That shows Jesus would be crucified at the end of the 69th week (with the previous "seven weeks" period from verse 25).

The next phrase of the above verse is about the Roman general Titus as that "prince" whose army came and destroyed the city of Jerusalem and its sanctuary in 70 A.D.

The rest of that verse is referring to the very end of this world. God used the idea of waters as a flood for a metaphor of how the "serpent" attacks the symbolic "woman", (Christ's Church of Revelation 12:13-17).


27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
KJV

That "he" MUST... be picked up with the subject back in the previous Dan.9:26 verse about that "prince" (Roman Titus as ruler or commander). There is NO word Messiah connected with that word "prince" in verse 26. For that reason, that particular "prince" MUST be interpreted as a common ruler or commander. It is about the Roman general Titus.

That "overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate" idea is about the "abomination that maketh desolate" of Daniel 11:31, which Lord Jesus warned the Church about for the very end of this world in His Olivet discourse (Matthew 24:15; Mark 13:14). Jesus was NOT pointing to Titus nor 70 A.D. Jesus was pointing to the very 'end' of this world just prior to His future return with that "abomination of desolation" IDOL being setup at a temple in Jerusalem. Thus that "he" is about the Final Antichrist at the end of this world.

Some who cannot grasp when God's Word is using metaphor in prophetic speech, wonder how that "he" of Dan.9:27 can be about the final Antichrist at the end of this world. It is because of how God's Word gives 'types' as examples. God used the "king of Tyrus" as a TYPE about Lucifer (Ezekiel 28). God used the "king of Babylon" as a TYPE for Lucifer (Isaiah 14). God used "the Assyrian" as a TYPE for Lucifer (Isaiah 10; Isaiah 30-31-33).

And with the history of what Antiochus Epiphanes did in 170-165 B.C. with spiritually desolating the 2nd temple in Jerusalem by ending the Jew's daily sacrifices, and instead his sacrificing swine inside that temple, and setting up an IDOL abomination in Zeus worship, also serves as a TYPE for the Final Antichrist placing the "abomination of desolation" IDOL at the end of this world for the coming "great tribulation".

But it is obvious that those you instead follow do not want fellow-believers on Jesus Christ to understand about that coming final Antichrist at the end of this world. Your words show you serve those children of darkness against Christ's Warning the Church about that coming Final Antichrist/false-Messiah placing that "abomination of desolation" IDOL in a NEW JEWISH temple to be built by the orthodox unbelieving Jews at the end of this world, of which those Jews in today's Jerusalem already have the materials ready to build it.

 

[covenantee]

Nope. The Daniel 9:26 and 27th verses are NOT linked to Jesus Christ regarding the end of this world. And Daniel 9:27 has absolutely nothing to do with Christ's Ministry at His 1st coming. That is where you have been following a doctrine of men.

HERE IS THE PROPER INTERPRETATION OF THE DANIEL 9:25-27 VERSES:

Dan 9:25-27
25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

"Messiah" is given as a noun in the above, and refers to the idea of a priest-king, and there is only One written of in God's Word that fits that priest-king role, Jesus Christ The Messiah (Ps.110:4; Zech.6:13; John 4:25). That word "Prince" above is Hebrew nagid, and can be translated as a ruler or leader or commander. But with the word "Messiah" as part of that declaration, it can only point to Jesus Christ, The Messiah.

Thus we are not... to confuse that word nagid (ruler) which is used later in the next Dan.9:26 verse as "prince" which is about the Roman ruler general Titus whose army destroyed Jerusalem and the temple in 70 A.D.


26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

Only that part above in 'red' is about Jesus Christ. That shows Jesus would be crucified at the end of the 69th week (with the previous "seven weeks" period from verse 25).

The next phrase of the above verse is about the Roman general Titus as that "prince" whose army came and destroyed the city of Jerusalem and its sanctuary in 70 A.D.

The rest of that verse is referring to the very end of this world. God used the idea of waters as a flood for a metaphor of how the "serpent" attacks the symbolic "woman", (Christ's Church of Revelation 12:13-17).


27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
KJV

That "he" MUST... be picked up with the subject back in the previous Dan.9:26 verse about that "prince" (Roman Titus as ruler or commander). There is NO word Messiah connected with that word "prince" in verse 26. For that reason, that particular "prince" MUST be interpreted as a common ruler or commander. It is about the Roman general Titus.

That "overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate" idea is about the "abomination that maketh desolate" of Daniel 11:31, which Lord Jesus warned the Church about for the very end of this world in His Olivet discourse (Matthew 24:15; Mark 13:14). Jesus was NOT pointing to Titus nor 70 A.D. Jesus was pointing to the very 'end' of this world just prior to His future return with that "abomination of desolation" IDOL being setup at a temple in Jerusalem. Thus that "he" is about the Final Antichrist at the end of this world.

Some who cannot grasp when God's Word is using metaphor in prophetic speech, wonder how that "he" of Dan.9:27 can be about the final Antichrist at the end of this world. It is because of how God's Word gives 'types' as examples. God used the "king of Tyrus" as a TYPE about Lucifer (Ezekiel 28). God used the "king of Babylon" as a TYPE for Lucifer (Isaiah 14). God used "the Assyrian" as a TYPE for Lucifer (Isaiah 10; Isaiah 30-31-33).

And with the history of what Antiochus Epiphanes did in 170-165 B.C. with spiritually desolating the 2nd temple in Jerusalem by ending the Jew's daily sacrifices, and instead his sacrificing swine inside that temple, and setting up an IDOL abomination in Zeus worship, also serves as a TYPE for the Final Antichrist placing the "abomination of desolation" IDOL at the end of this world for the coming "great tribulation".

But it is obvious that those you instead follow do not want fellow-believers on Jesus Christ to understand about that coming final Antichrist at the end of this world. Your words show you serve those children of darkness against Christ's Warning the Church about that coming Final Antichrist/false-Messiah placing that "abomination of desolation" IDOL in a NEW JEWISH temple to be built by the orthodox unbelieving Jews at the end of this world, of which those Jews in today's Jerusalem already have the materials ready to build it.

Your hallucinogenic antichrist is a joke. The word "antichrist" is not found in the OT.

Your "types" are jokes. Lucifer is not antichrist. Antiochus is not antichrist. Those are naught but products of a psychotic imagination.

The most egregious travesty is that which attempts to contort Christ into antichrist.

That is no joke. It is an heretical blasphemous abomination of desecration.

 

[TribulationSigns]

Nope. The Daniel 9:26 and 27th verses are NOT linked to Jesus Christ...

You denied the prince of verses 26 and 27 as Jesus Christ, Messiah the PRINCE, per context, so there is no reason to dialogue with you further. You are wandering farther and farther from the truth with your false premillennial doctrine, despite some members trying to correct your doctrine. I am not going to waste my time on this thread.

Goodbye

 

[Douggg]

The next phrase of the above verse is about the Roman general Titus as that "prince" whose army came and destroyed the city of Jerusalem and its sanctuary in 70 A.D.

The Romans did destroy the temple and city in 70 AD fulfilling that part of the verse.

But Titus is not the prince that shall come. The prince that shall come is an end times person who will confirm the covenant for 7 years. Otherwise, there is no person in Daniel 9:27 to confirm the covenant for 7 years.

Here's how to understand those verses.

26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

27 And he [the prince that shall come ] shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Now when we put all of the stages of that person together as he develops, it looks like this.....

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

Like I said, the events shown in the Daniel 9:27 verse DO NOT RELATE to the events in the 26th verse.

And, this, ladies and gentlemen, is how you twist scripture to make it say whatever you want it to say. You can do that like Davy did here by foolishly claiming that two verses that are clearly relate do not relate to each other.

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

Your hallucinogenic antichrist is a joke. The word "antichrist" is not found in the OT.

Your "types" are jokes. Lucifer is not antichrist. Antiochus is not antichrist. Those are naught but products of a psychotic imagination.

The most egregious travesty is that which attempts to contort Christ into antichrist.

That is no joke. It is an heretical blasphemous abomination of desecration.

I couldn't agree more. Any doctrine that tries to turn a verse about Christ, such as Daniel 9:27, into a verse about a supposed Antichrist instead is an antichrist doctrine.

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

The Romans did destroy the temple and city in 70 AD fulfilling that part of the verse.

But Titus is not the prince that shall come. The prince that shall come is an end times person who will confirm the covenant for 7 years.

You have the prince of the people who destroyed the temple and city in 70 AD not even being around in 70 AD and showing up at least 2,000 years or so later. That is pure nonsense.

 

[Douggg]

You have the prince of the people who destroyed the temple and city in 70 AD not even being around in 70 AD and showing up at least 2,000 years or so later. That is pure nonsense.

You abbreviated what it said in verse 26.

It not just "the prince", but "the prince that shall come". When used in that context and wording, the implication identifies of what group of people the prince that shall come will be of.

He will be of the Roman Empire manifested in the end times..... i.e. the EU. The comprehensive development of the person will be...

as the little horn, that becomes the prince that shall come, that becomes the Antichrist, that becomes the revealed man of sin, that becomes the beast-king.

 

[Spiritual Israelite]

You abbreviated what it said in verse 26.

It not just "the prince", but "the prince that shall come".

That doesn't change the point at all. He was the prince that shall come as of the time that was written, which was long before the city and sanctuary were destroyed. In no way, shape or form does it indicate that the prince would not be alive when the people of the prince that shall come were alive. Your view makes it so that they were not actually the people of the prince that was to come in the future as of the time that was written.