No, it doesn't. Besides, my mom said that my father NEVER TOUCHED HER IN ANGER UNTIL AFTER THEY WERE MARRIED. They dated for two years prior to marriage. Remember what I mentioned earlier about 'milestones'? Once married, my dad felt he OWNED her, and that he could do whatever he wanted to her.I'm sorry to hear that @Mink57. I won't say that choosing bad men seems to run in your family. Not to suggest this applies to your case but two general things I noticed:
- The standards of abuse decline over time. (My ex-wife once told me telling our teen girls "no" is abusive).
- The emotional abuse women dish out to men prior to getting physical is ignored.
Your ex-wife was wrong about that.
While SOME women are emotionally abusive to men before the man becomes physical, MOST women don't do this.
I haven't heard that one before.To hear feminists tell the story, the lady of the house was baking cookies when all a sudden, the monster they choose started beating on them for no reason whatsoever. Feminism has outlawed men's primary advantage over men while language usage (and abusive disrespect) is allowed and even encouraged.
I can understand that leaving would be "burden" (for EITHER sex) IF we're talking about abuse IN MARRIAGE, especially marriage with children. But much of abuse occurs BEFORE marriage, or even if marriage isn't on the table (yet).Ever notice how it is the men that have the burden to leave before things get physical?
As to the underlined, it's interesting that you would say that.That does not work in the real world. You're out in the woods when a lion, tiger or bear come around ... men are far more dangerous than these creatures. Most would say you should not invade a lion or tiger or bears habitat to avoid getting mauled. The point is lost on feminists.
Yup, and the MEN who are physically abusive feel the same way. The excuse for abuse knows no gender. I guess there's "equality" in that regard.By contrast, there are vids of feminists not only being physically abusive to the spouse, but feeling morall self-righteous and justifying it + encouraged by the feminist friends to do more frequently and severely. Can a man be a victim of domestic abuse?
Actually, the model of feminism occurred when several of the leading 1800's Suffragettes observed (and lived with) the Iroquois Indians. They saw that the Iroquois women had much, much more of a say in government, economics, negotiations, war counsels, agriculture and that they took on more of a leadership role in day-to-day living.Feminism is an idealistic philosophy, striving for an unobtainable utopia (which is one reason why it is evil).
The Iroquois are not a Matriarchy, but they are matrilineal. The Suffragettes observed how peaceful of a nation they are, with hardly any violence. Could it be because they were under 'women-rule'?
I'd like to clear something up, if I may. Toxic Masculinity does NOT mean that ALL men are "toxic" or that ALL masculine traits are "toxic".Raising the standards on men to be impossible to meet in practice (see above), they guess there is absolutely no negative consequences for removing the unneeded, "toxic" man. Decades of reality prove otherwise as you noted.
The toxicity is directed as specific traits.
The following is from the linked Wikipedia page:
"The concept of toxic masculinity is used in academic and media discussions[among whom?] to refer to those aspects of hegemonic masculinity that are socially destructive, such as misogyny, homophobia, and violent domination. These traits are considered "toxic" due in part to their promotion of violence, including sexual assault and domestic violence. Socialization of boys sometimes also normalizes violence, such as in the saying "boys will be boys" about bullying and aggression."
Toxic masculinity - Wikipedia
See what I wrote about the Iroquois above.I once engaged a pastor, juxtaposing these two points. If you want the societal benefits of men, they have to return to not merely being present in an emascualted capacity but being the head of the household, you're going to have to accept him doing it to HIS standards, not feminist standards. Said differently, reality won't be perfect but with strong men as head of households, you did not have the stats above.
I'm reminded of the Godfather, where Freddie was slapped around a couple of times so the place could run right. Freddie defended his boss, knowing Michael took the scene as life and death, which it wasn't.
View attachment 49943