You're not addressing the issue.You can't stop being born again.
Not interested in games.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You're not addressing the issue.You can't stop being born again.
Yet the Christian who sins is condemned.Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
No. There is no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus because they are in Christ Jesus.Isn't it true that the reason there is no condemnation for those in Christ is because they are not sinning?
While your conclusion might be true, Romans 14:23 does not support your conclusion because Paul isn't talking about breaking faith. He is talking about breaking fellowship with those who eat meat.Therefore, when Romans 14:23 refers to the Christian who is condemned for breaking faith by doing what he does not believe, it is teaching that this person is not abiding in Christ. Obviously, to abide in Christ means to believe in His mercy that reconnects you to Him, and to then walk before Him in peace.
The word translated "doubt" doesn't mean "question a belief" it means "break company with."Romans 1:17 says "God's righteousness is revealed from faith to faith", thus the Christian, who is to reveal God's righteousness (not his own), is, in all his actions, to be "fully convinced in his own mind" (Romans 14:5)--and, because this is true, if the Christian does what he doubts is correct before the Lord, it is sin (not the revelation of God's righteousness) whereby the Christian is condemned (Romans 14:23).
The condemnation was bc of slavery to sin, but they're freed from slavery to Sin in Christ (Ro 8:2) so that IF they walk after the Spirit they fulfill the righteous requirement of the Law (Ro 8:4), and live, but IF they walk after the flesh they will die (Ro 8:12,13). This is the same principle that was true of the Jews, who were typologically "saved" by the blood of their Passover lambs (corresponding to Christians being saved by the blood of "Christ, our Passover lamb"): they were set free from slavery to Pharaoh in Egypt, but only so that they would go and keep God's commands in the Promised land, and, if they would not go and serve God, despite having been saved, they would fall under God's wrath and not inherit what was promised to them.No. There is no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus because they are in Christ Jesus.
Nowhere is that idea present in the verse; it says anything that is not from faith is sin, and this includes eating with doubts.While your conclusion might be true, Romans 14:23 does not support your conclusion because Paul isn't talking about breaking faith. He is talking about breaking fellowship with those who eat meat.
No, it doesn't, because he goes on to explain "anything that is not from faith is sin", so the person sinned and was condemned bc of eating without faith, or eating with doubt.The word translated "doubt" doesn't mean "question a belief" it means "break company with."
Nope.The word translated "doubt" doesn't mean "question a belief" it means "break company with."
You can't stop being born again.
To clarify: 1 Jn 2:28 warns the "children" (spiritually immature) to remain in Christ or else they will be ashamed and shrink back at the return of Christ.You're not addressing the issue.
Not interested in games.
Look at this guy actually trying to argue against Paul the Apostle.Did you take a shower yesterday?
Was it taken in faith?
Do you know the Living Holy Spirit in your heart/spirit..have you been Born Again by Gods Living witness His Living Holy Spirit?Look at this guy actually trying to argue against Paul the Apostle.
How ludicrous.
To answer your ridiculous ignorance, yes, if you take a shower, and it's not taken in faith, you are sinning.
When you are acting, acting in faith is the only way to reveal God's righteousness.
If you're not revealing God's righteousness, why aren't you? You're pursuing something else, some idol.
I don't deny that people who disagree with what I'm saying can know God--God doesn't wait for our theology to be perfect to reveal Himself to us--but I'm not interested in sharing the beliefs of the Christians of many different stripes, all with opposing views, all with damnations for one another, who know God.Do you know the Living Holy Spirit in your heart/spirit..have you been Born Again by Gods Living witness His Living Holy Spirit?
Reading your understanding of therefore there is no condemnation etc...you seen to understand the written word from your “ own” perspective...
That’s why you are so very confused believing that a Born Again can lose their salvation, it’s really sad to see, ..I Pray that the Lord speaks to your heart/ spirit....instead of the enemy bombarding your thoughts and understanding of God’s written word....we must be Born Of The Spirit...it’s the Living Holy Spirit who brings Gods written word to our understanding in our heart/ spirit....
May God Bless you in your heart/ spirit to know His Living truth.
You need to be Born Of The Spirit , He is The Living Spirit you need , that testifies with our spirit that we are Gods children.....God Bless...just my opinion of what you type.
100% Amen!!God doesn't wait for our theology to be perfect to reveal Himself to us-
I did go back and read again your OP post. Gave you a like but then wondered why you threw in once saved always saved as a way of condemnation? That part threw me and made me question the motive for the topic.Romans 1:17 says "God's righteousness is revealed from faith to faith", thus the Christian, who is to reveal God's righteousness (not his own), is, in all his actions, to be "fully convinced in his own mind" (Romans 14:5)--and, because this is true, if the Christian does what he doubts is correct before the Lord, it is sin (not the revelation of God's righteousness) whereby the Christian is condemned (Romans 14:23).
^tried to touch on the Op above. I didn’t see any problem with the verses you quoted. As I said…you threw me when the post did a one-eighty around to once saved always saved.Yet the Christian who sins is condemned.
This must mean he's not abiding "in Christ".
I've cited many verses that teach that reality.
You're free to respond to those whenever you please.
how did we go from Romans 8 to romans 14.. is it not you that always complains about keeping on topic. Rom 14 has nothign to do with our conversationThere are no unbelievers in view, with respect to instructions he's giving on how Christians are to be living, in Romans 14.
Thank you for proving me right. But lets get it clear. It says he is condemned already, because he has not believed.. That changes everythingThe one who does what he does not believe is not in faith, thus he is condemned.
lol.. We love to read scriptureIt's really interesting to see the wheels fall off the OSASer's buses when they actually read Scripture.
Scripture says he's condemned, so I believe it.
But you are trying to use him to prove a point in error.He ate, and plunged the world into condemnation; the other user tried to make light of the issue of eating, and he was wrong for doing that. He was trying to make his point appear more believable, and mine less believable, but he was taking shots at Scriptural truth in order to do it. Not helpful.
lol. In other words, You have no idea what Adam did..Irrelevant.
He condemns himself. because he continues to feel guilty because he is doing something he is not convinced he is ok in doing what he is doing. Its not rocket science.Fully convinced about what you should be doing--the one who acts in doubt is condemned, because God's righteousness is revealed from faith to faith, not our own righteousness from the knowledge of Good and Evil.
No. I am doing no such thing, You read my words like you do the bible. with your blinders on. you see what you want to see.Interesting: you actually are conceding that, since this section of Scripture doesn't deal with "faith that Christ died and resurrected", but "conviction about how one should walk before the Lord", you're admitting that salvation depends on how we walk.
lol. I am dealing with scripture head on.. All you appear to be doing is continue to try to deflect from the issues at hand.. Like you always doLOL You always run away to hide behind abuses of other Scriptures to avoid dealing with Scripture head-on.
coming from you. this is classic!You're not addressing the issue.
Not interested in games.
Security is a good word. I still love the law of jealousies back in Numbers 5…I’ll never forget it. How one woman drinks and is called an adulterer bringing forth death. And the woman who drinks and is Free, and she conceives Seed. Yes…there must be “security” within God otherwise one would be tormented; tossed back and forth between the water and fire.a. What is the solution? Being in Christ is the solution. In other words, security is only found in Jesus as opposed to looking for security in oneself ie, by ones sinlessness or ones focus on it.
No, it does not say this,Yet the Christian who sins is condemned.
This must mean he's not abiding "in Christ".
I've cited many verses that teach that reality.
You're free to respond to those whenever you please.
Get to know the OP. You will see almost every post is with this motive.I did go back and read again your OP post. Gave you a like but then wondered why you threw in once saved always saved as a way of condemnation? That part threw me and made me question the motive for the topic.
Yes, we should not argue about doubtful things, Yet we see this happen all day long. The sabbath arguments, The tithing argument, The denominational arguments,Love the above “fully convinced in his own mind” … let every man be persuaded in his own mind. Romans 14:1 Him that is weak in the faith receive you, but not to doubtful disputations.
23 But he who doubts is condemned if he eats, because he does not eat from faith; for whatever is not from faith is sin.Love also where it says he who doubts is condemned already. John 3:18 He that believes on him is not condemned: but he that believes not is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
I am really not sure what you mean here, can you explain?To me that means condemnation already works the end there death—in him who does not believe in the name of the only begotten Son of God. This one grows weak and perishes and needs THE strength of those claiming to possess all things where although poor (in Christ) making many rich. The man who is condemned already wears a coat of poverty not being rich towards God but he is wasting away in his being separated from God. To me this is what it means by “he is condemn already” in “death already works” …who will divide out their bread with the poor towards God?
That is his point, he is attacking OSAS.. almost every post he makes is with this in mind^tried to touch on the Op above. I didn’t see any problem with the verses you quoted. As I said…you threw me when the post did a one-eighty around to once saved always saved.
Condemned already …I’m not sure what you’re asking? I mean to be condemned already to me means …being without God. Like a child in the womb being separated from the essential food supply and nourishment source given through the cord, nutrients coming directly from its mother. It won’t survive without that nourishment. it’s just a fact “condemned already” isn’t it? As condemned as a growing embryo shut off from a food supply source is…the cause and effect of “without God” ? Does that make sense? (Maybe that’s a bad example. Don’t misunderstand I’m not suggesting condemnation for newborns, only giving it as an example of what “already” means to me)am really not sure what you mean here, can you explain?
To me condemned already is a judicial term.Condemned already …I’m not sure what you’re asking? I mean to be condemned already to me means …being without God. Like a child in the womb being separated from the essential food supply and nourishment source given through the cord, nutrients coming directly from its mother. It won’t survive without that nourishment. it’s just a fact “condemned already” isn’t it? As condemned as a growing embryo shut off from a food supply source is…the cause and effect of “without God” ? Does that make sense? (Maybe that’s a bad example. Don’t misunderstand I’m not suggesting condemnation for newborns, only giving it as an example of what “already” means to me)
it makes me think of: overcharging
2 Corinthians 2:6-8 Sufficient to such a man is this punishment, which was inflicted of many. [7] So that contrariwise you ought rather to forgive him, and comfort him, lest perhaps such a one should be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow. [8] Wherefore I beseech you that you would confirm your love toward him.