LOL, Funny!And he was a genius baby too. Good call. ;)
Loved Alex Baldwin as the voice for BB. Perfect.
Magnet sticks vaccination arm
- Thread starter pompadour
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
Exactly, so if I can ask @pompadour and @Heart2Soul what I believe to be a few legit questions,.. are you basing your opinion about the vaccine on what you see on the internet? Or is it based on what you've witnessed in real life? Please be honest with me too.
Let me explain how I determined not to get the vaccine...
During the Obama administration Fauci submitted a request for a government grant of 3.5 million dollars to set up a study here in the U.S. to study the virus...the flu virus of 2003 and 2009 which one was labeled a pandemic and the other wasn't yet had almost the same number of deaths.
Homeland Security denied his request because he wanted to use the Chinese scientists, bring them here to set up a lab and study it....at the time cybersecurity had suffered a major breach from China...
So Fauci went to Obama and secretly obtained the money and sent it to Wuhan, China's lab....
Now...interestingly Fauci gave a speech and announced there WOULD BE A SURPRISE PANDEMIC IN THIS NEXT ADMINISTRATION....
That was in 2017 right after Trump's Inauguration....
Let me remind you under the Obama administration the H1N1 outbreak received very little news attention and it was never declared a pandemic...correction it was but did not get the attention as the COVID-19..
So here is my bottom line....I have never once believed this virus was the big bad wolf that superceded the past outbreaks as deadlier than those were....
Therefore, I refuse to be vaccinated for virus that was hyped up as the deadliest virus in history and that doesn't exist.
Too many Virologists and Lab scientists have testified that the CDC sent numerous COVID-19 samples to be studied and out of the 1500 samples not one was COVID....they were all Influenza A and Influenza B...
So again I will not be vaccinated for a hoax...
@April_Rose ....
Here is a report you might find interesting..
Introduction
In 2009, governments throughout the world mounted large and costly responses to the H1N1 influenza outbreak. These efforts were largely justified on the premise that H1N1 influenza and seasonal influenza required different management, a premise reinforced by the decision on the part of the World Health Organization (WHO) to label the H1N1 influenza outbreak a “pandemic”. However, the outbreak had far less serious consequences than experts had predicted, a fact that led many to wonder if the public health responses to H1N1 had not been disproportionately aggressive.1–3 In addition, concern over ties between WHO advisers and industry fuelled suspicion about the independence and appropriateness of the decisions made at the national and international levels.4
Central to this debate has been the question of whether H1N1 influenza should have been labelled a “pandemic” at all. The Council of Europe voiced serious concerns that the declaration of a pandemic became possible only after WHO changed its definition of pandemic influenza. It also expressed misgivings over WHO’s decision to withhold publication of the names of its H1N1 advisory Emergency Committee.3 WHO, however, denied having changed any definitions and defended the scientific validity of its decisions, citing “numerous safeguards” for handling potential conflicts of interest.5
At stake in this debate are the public trust in health officials and our collective capacity to respond effectively to future disease threats. Understanding this controversy entails acknowledging that both parties are partially correct, and to resolve it we must re-evaluate how emerging threats should be defined in a world where the simple act of labelling a disease has enormous social, economic and political implications.
What sparked the controversy
Since 2003, the top of the WHO Pandemic Preparedness homepage has contained the following statement: “An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”6 However, on 4 May 2009, scarcely one month before the H1N1 pandemic was declared, the web page was altered in response to a query from a CNN reporter.7 The phrase “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” had been removed and the revised web page simply read as follows: “An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity.” Months later, the Council of Europe would cite this alteration as evidence that WHO changed its definition of pandemic influenza to enable it to declare a pandemic without having to demonstrate the intensity of the disease caused by the H1N1 virus.3
A description versus a definition
Here is a report you might find interesting..
Introduction
In 2009, governments throughout the world mounted large and costly responses to the H1N1 influenza outbreak. These efforts were largely justified on the premise that H1N1 influenza and seasonal influenza required different management, a premise reinforced by the decision on the part of the World Health Organization (WHO) to label the H1N1 influenza outbreak a “pandemic”. However, the outbreak had far less serious consequences than experts had predicted, a fact that led many to wonder if the public health responses to H1N1 had not been disproportionately aggressive.1–3 In addition, concern over ties between WHO advisers and industry fuelled suspicion about the independence and appropriateness of the decisions made at the national and international levels.4
Central to this debate has been the question of whether H1N1 influenza should have been labelled a “pandemic” at all. The Council of Europe voiced serious concerns that the declaration of a pandemic became possible only after WHO changed its definition of pandemic influenza. It also expressed misgivings over WHO’s decision to withhold publication of the names of its H1N1 advisory Emergency Committee.3 WHO, however, denied having changed any definitions and defended the scientific validity of its decisions, citing “numerous safeguards” for handling potential conflicts of interest.5
At stake in this debate are the public trust in health officials and our collective capacity to respond effectively to future disease threats. Understanding this controversy entails acknowledging that both parties are partially correct, and to resolve it we must re-evaluate how emerging threats should be defined in a world where the simple act of labelling a disease has enormous social, economic and political implications.
What sparked the controversy
Since 2003, the top of the WHO Pandemic Preparedness homepage has contained the following statement: “An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”6 However, on 4 May 2009, scarcely one month before the H1N1 pandemic was declared, the web page was altered in response to a query from a CNN reporter.7 The phrase “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” had been removed and the revised web page simply read as follows: “An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity.” Months later, the Council of Europe would cite this alteration as evidence that WHO changed its definition of pandemic influenza to enable it to declare a pandemic without having to demonstrate the intensity of the disease caused by the H1N1 virus.3
A description versus a definition
WHO | The elusive definition of pandemic influenza
Here is the link if you want to read.the whole thing.
Here is the link if you want to read.the whole thing.
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
Hold on! Rewind a little bit as I tried to reply before and my internet went out on me. Before I get to the above article, can I please have the source of Fauci predicting the pandemic?
@April_Rose ...now do you see Little Grasshopper?:)....Kung Fu series....Master Po called Caine (David Caradine) little grasshopper
Taodeching
Active Member
No, The internet is the stupidity now of days. It would have been better if it had never been invented. Stupid anti-vaxxers use it to make sure the pandemic stays around and unnecessarily scare people.
It's very possible that the pandemic was caused from people like Fauci trying to explore the virus
Taodeching
Active Member
Exactly. Unfortunately there is more crap on the internet that gullible and not so gullible people get led down wrong paths because of it.
Of course humanity was quite overdue for a pandemic and it wasn't hard to predict a pandemic to come. There are many disasters that we are way overdue for like a massive earthquake and huge volcanic eruptions along the ring of fire in the pacific, not to mention the huge super volcano that is way overdue for eruption under Yellowstone. We tend to think because someone predicted something bad they had a hand in it somehow. Now could he have had a hand it it? Sure but at this point we really don't know. Though I do lean in the same direction as you in that regard
Last edited:
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
That image is enough to give anybody nightmares.
That's interesting but I see two problems with this:
1. It could have just been a coincidence.
2. How do you know that he was referring to Covid? (Another fair question if I say so myself.)
Taodeching
Active Member
Exactly. As I opined in the other thread just because someone said we were going to have a pandemic (which humanity was a bit over due for and they usually come about every hundred years or so) doesn't mean they were talking about a specific thing.
I don't believe in coincidences do you? And as I shared already Fauci was using taxpayer money to study the coronavirus in China....so he made the statement based on the trends of past viruses.....and I will add my thoughts here, why wait til Dec. 2019? Perhaps it was because 2020 was an election year and boy did the democrats ever use the virus as a weapon against Trump in many ways, economy, voter turnout, set up mail in ballot votes, and so forth.......That image is enough to give anybody nightmares.
That's interesting but I see two problems with this:
1. It could have just been a coincidence.
2. How do you know that he was referring to Covid? (Another fair question if I say so myself.)
If it looks like a snake, hisses like a snake, crawls like a snake....then it might be a snake.....and that's what I received in prayer from the Holy Spirit.....lies and deception....corruption and greed...power and dominance.
Do not trust anything you hear or see on the social networks....He said.....watch and see what I do....He said....Nothing is what it seems......He said....Keep your eyes on Israel...He said....and Trust only in Me....He Said....
Many will be deceived....if possible even the highest elect....the spirit of antichrist has risen in power and is infesting everything worldly....
Be as wise as a serpent and gentle as a dove and keep your spiritual eyes open.
The Magnetic Mark of the Beast
more magnetic effects with vaxxed at jab point...either they are all fake or all real?
more magnetic effects with vaxxed at jab point...either they are all fake or all real?
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
Logging back in for a few moments because I saw that you replied to this. While I agree with you that the demonrats used this pandemic to cheat, I don't agree with the fact that it was planned. I believe that it was solely the work of China and that they did it on purpose as well.
More magnetic effects..it is hard to dispute..all over the world
https://cdn.lbryplayer.xyz/api/v3/s...8720ec88f4b73fdc77d28bc9c836dd0f7919c9/4d2522
https://cdn.lbryplayer.xyz/api/v3/s...8720ec88f4b73fdc77d28bc9c836dd0f7919c9/4d2522
That would imply they planned it...lol.
Hugs
April_Rose
Well-Known Member
Sure,.. the Chinese government did but I don't think the US knew anything about it. And they say that the guy who reported about it coincidentally caught the virus afterwards. Umm,.. yeah,.. I honestly don't think so. *Hugs back*
@pompadour I honestly think I've already been chipped but not by my gov. The dental injection left a heavy metal object in my jaw that shows up on x-rays. Maybe paranoia though.
Similar threads
