CadyandZoe
Well-Known Member
I do, but that doesn't mean that I am an Israelite. You mistakenly take Paul's arguments farther than he intends.So, you don't believe you are a child of God and of the promise who is counted as Abraham's seed?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I do, but that doesn't mean that I am an Israelite. You mistakenly take Paul's arguments farther than he intends.So, you don't believe you are a child of God and of the promise who is counted as Abraham's seed?
So, you don't believe you are a child of God and of the promise who is counted as Abraham's seed?
Romans 9:6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
Galatians 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
I'm sorry are you saying that Jesus was incorrect?It wasn't left desolate to Jesus' disciples. Matthew 26:28
It wasn't left desolate to the 3,000 Israelites who gave birth to the Church at Pentecost. Acts 2:41
Nor to any Israelite in Christ since.
I'm sorry too; are you?I'm sorry are you saying that Jesus was incorrect?
I didn't ignore anything.It's based on a word that simply means to live or be alive. Why do you ignore that?
First of all, I have already given you the answer to your question. I quoted the BDAG 425. BDAG stands for Bauer, Danker, Arndt, and Gingrich, the authors of the renowned lexicon titled A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. It's a key resource for biblical scholars and students studying the Greek New TestamentShow me where the only definition of that word is to be physically restored to life after having died and that it can't be used to refer to someone who is spiritually alive but physically dead.
Because it is obvious to those who have eyes to see.So you claim. Why do you presume to know that our discernment is lacking while yours is not? Why do you presume that the text speaks directly to you and that we need your help to understand it?
Oh, it is a biblical notion in the NEW Testament.I didn't ignore anything.
First of all, I have already given you the answer to your question. I quoted the BDAG 425. BDAG stands for Bauer, Danker, Arndt, and Gingrich, the authors of the renowned lexicon titled A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. It's a key resource for biblical scholars and students studying the Greek New Testament
Secondly, you and I are separated by your acceptance of Platonic thought, based on dualism, that a soul can survive outside of a body. This is not a Biblical notion. The Bible doesn't believe that a soul can exist apart from the Body.
It is the case, as Scripture points out.That isn't the case, as I have already pointed out.
Paul addressed the genetics of his day.Not according to Paul.
Jesus pronounced several "woes" on the Jewish leaders of Jerusalem, including his prediction that their house would be left to them desolate.I'm sorry too; are you?
I agree. If a person is observant, he or she can tell when another person lacks discernment. On the other hand, someone with a weak argument and an inability to defend incorrect conclusions might accuse another person of lacking discernment.Because it is obvious to those who have eyes to see.
Rumpelstiltskin again- an attempt to discredit an argument by associating it with a disfavored group.Oh, it is a biblical notion in the NEW Testament.
Not in JW teaching they teach people when they die go poof and are gone as if they never were.
Jesus defends the concept of resurrection, comparing "the sons of this age" with "the sons of the resurrection." He quotes Moses to support his contention that the dead are raised. "For he is not the God of the dead but of the living, for all live to Him." What does Jesus mean by "all live to him?"For example
34 Jesus answered and said to them, “The sons of this age marry and are given in marriage. 35 But those who are counted worthy to attain that age, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage; 36 nor can they die anymore, for they are equal to the angels and are sons of God, being sons of the resurrection. 37 But even Moses showed in the burning bush passage that the dead are raised, when he called the Lord ‘the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.’ 38 For He is not the God of the dead but of the living, for all live to Him.”
2 Corinthians 5:8 can be confusing if one has not followed Paul's argument, which began in 2 Corinthians 4:16. Here Paul encourages his readers with the idea that although "our outer man is decaying, yet our inner man is being renewed day by day." And though our outer man will pass away someday, God has another outer man prepared for us that will never pass away.39 Then some of the scribes answered and said, “Teacher, You have spoken well.” 40 But after that they dared not question Him anymore.
And
2 Corinthians 5
1 For we know that if our earthly [a]house, this tent, is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. 2 For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed with our [b]habitation which is from heaven, 3 if indeed, having been clothed, we shall not be found naked. 4 For we who are in this tent groan, being burdened, not because we want to be unclothed, but further clothed, that mortality may be swallowed up by life. 5 Now He who has prepared us for this very thing is God, who also has given us the Spirit as [c]a guarantee.
6 So we are always confident, knowing that while we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord. 7 For we walk by faith, not by sight. 8 We are confident, yes, well pleased rather to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord.
Then use scripture to make your case.It is the case, as Scripture points out.
Who said anything about genetics?Paul addressed the genetics of his day.
Oh sorry; I should have specified "seed" or "flesh" because there are those who are incapable of understanding "genetics".Then use scripture to make your case.
Who said anything about genetics?
Your argument from genetics doesn't square with God's word concerning Israel.
Amos 9:9 “For behold, I am commanding, And I will shake the house of Israel among all nations As grain is shaken in a sieve, But not a kernel will fall to the ground.
The image of not losing a grain is striking and quite profound.
Notice that Jesus did not pronounce any woes upon His disciples or anyone else who received His New Covenant and Blood.Jesus pronounced several "woes" on the Jewish leaders of Jerusalem, including his prediction that their house would be left to them desolate.
Mathew 23:37-39 Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were unwilling. Behold, your house is being left to you desolate! For I say to you, from now on you will not see Me until you say, "Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!"
Jesus predicts Israel's House will be left desolate until the Second Advent. At that time, the scribes and Pharisees will say, Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord! At that time also, God's covenant will come to pass when each man and his neighbor will know the Lord.
Except you have tainted what you said with your own theology.Rumpelstiltskin again- an attempt to discredit an argument by associating it with a disfavored group.
Jesus defends the concept of resurrection, comparing "the sons of this age" with "the sons of the resurrection." He quotes Moses to support his contention that the dead are raised. "For he is not the God of the dead but of the living, for all live to Him." What does Jesus mean by "all live to him?"
Jesus means to say that we find our existence in God. From God's perspective and his standpoint as our creator, we all exist, whether we have died or not. He isn't saying, one way or the other, whether our soul survives the death of our body. That would be to take his meaning beyond what he intended.
2 Corinthians 5:8 can be confusing if one has not followed Paul's argument, which began in 2 Corinthians 4:16. Here Paul encourages his readers with the idea that although "our outer man is decaying, yet our inner man is being renewed day by day." And though our outer man will pass away someday, God has another outer man prepared for us that will never pass away.
Given Paul's previous argument, 2 Corinthians 5:8 is an unbalanced metaphor. He says, "well pleased rather to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord." To balance the analogy, Paul would have said, "well pleased rather to be absent from our mortal body and to be present with the Lord in our incorruptible body."