Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Are you trying to tell me that Peter didn't really know what he was talking about despite being inspired by the Holy Spirit? Are you trying to tell me that Peter was limited in his understanding of the day of the Lord despite the fact that what he wrote did not come from his own mind, but from the Holy Spirit?
It's obvious that I'm not. What does post 358 have to do with what we're talking about? Why can't you just communicate like a normal person instead of playing games?
I'm talking about the permanent forgiveness of sins. No one's sins were permanently covered until Christ made His sacrifice.
Saying that the new covenant isn't in effect is like saying Jesus didn't die and rise again from the dead.
Peter definitely spoke by the Holy Spirit = 100%
He gave them different details of the same event, but they both taught that no unbelievers will survive the return of Christ.
Then I suggest that you practice what you preach....instead of standing in judgement of others...if you don’t know the answer to a question...rather than ignore it, say that you don’t understand the question.
AGREE with you mostly but not entirely.
I am = you are invited to join me in His love for each other and we can be pleasing to our Heavenly FATHER.
No you aren’t David..I’ve asked you many questions on another thread, which you have completely ignored ...if you don’t understand a question..then I suggest you do what I’ve just done and own up to not understanding the question...in future when I come to you with a question....
What do you agree with that I said and what do you disagree with?
So? The same Holy Spirit who inspired Peter and Paul also inspired John.
Nonsense. Nowhere is this taught in scripture. Peter did not submit to Paul's understanding, he said Paul had some writings that were difficult to understand, but not too difficult because he said those who distort it do so to their own destruction. Nowhere did he say his writings were in any way inferior or lacking compared to Paul's. And, nowhere does it say that "Peter and Paul submit to John's understanding". They were all inspired by the same Holy Spirit. You had to come up with some way to deny what Peter and Paul taught and this is what you came up with. Sad.
Of course. But, it looks like you have decided that Peter and Paul didn't really know what they were talking about and only John did. Despite all of them being inspired by the same Holy Spirit.
So, can you tell me how you interpret 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 and 2 Peter 3:10-12? Were Peter and Paul mistaken to indicate that all who are in spiritual darkness will be destroyed when Jesus comes as a thief in the night?
Rita,
I have never become hostile David...you are talking about yourself here.
Yes and I explained why...how about you check out some of your posts, when I’ve asked you questions...I could post some of your sarcastic and hostile replies.
So stop being the hypocrite that you are.and start taking a good look at yourself “ inwardly” let go of your own pride and ego.
Where? What you quoted here says nothing about Peter submitting to Paul's understanding as if Paul's understanding was superior to his. Notice that Peter said in relation to Paul's writings "untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction". Clearly, Peter understood Paul's writings or else he too would have twisted them to his own destruction. So, why do you think that Paul's understanding was superior to Peter's? It was not. And neither of them had inferior understanding to John. The same Holy Spirit taught them all.
LOL. You act like you just came here to be a peacemaker when you are the one who came here and ranted at Scott telling him he should know better than what he was saying. No, you should know better because you are the one promoting false doctrine, not him. Stop being a hypocrite.
You're right. He is a hypocrite. He acts like everyone else is being rude when he is the one that rudely came into this thread out of nowhere and started ranting at Scott that he should know better while not addressing even one of the points that Scott made.
Even I owned up to not understanding his question that he asked of me....yet imo he can’t do the same...then he starts telling me it’s my pride and ego...pot kettle black eh?
He's a fake and there's several others like that on here as well. He won't even address any questions we ask him or any of the points that we make. He just says we're wrong and that's it and does nothing to back it up.
I agree.sometimes it’s a good thing...to check back on our posts to reread how we address people on here at times....we need to be in control of what comes out of our mouths...
