It should be obvious that Isaiah 65:20 is figurative because taking it literally the way you do contradicts Revelation 21:4.
Why are you not addressing my point? It doesn't say the first new heaven and first new earth. The first heaven and first earth is the current heaven and earth that have existed since the beginning of time. But, you have Revelation 21 saying that the second new heavens and new earth replace the first new heavens and first new earth that pass away instead.
I dont see it as figurative so I guess we will leave it at thatIt should be obvious that Isaiah 65:20 is figurative because taking it literally the way you do contradicts Revelation 21:4.
I thought I did address your points....sorry but I cant always follow......I address what I can.....if you really are wanting something addressed by me then restate it if need beWhy are you not addressing my point? It doesn't say the first new heaven and first new earth. The first heaven and first earth is the current heaven and earth that have existed since the beginning of time. But, you have Revelation 21 saying that the second new heavens and new earth replace the first new heavens and first new earth that pass away instead.
Isaiah 65:17 is saying there will be a new heavens and earth.....I agree that the first will pass away.....I am not saying that Isaiah 65:17 is describing the new heavens and earth as being fulfilled now .....Isaiah 65 is describing the millennial kingdom