Spiritual Israelite
Well-Known Member
Right. When we keep reading from there it shows how Christ will one day destroy the heathen with His rod of iron.It has broad application to how the heathen resist and fight against Christ.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Right. When we keep reading from there it shows how Christ will one day destroy the heathen with His rod of iron.It has broad application to how the heathen resist and fight against Christ.
It has broad application to how the heathen resist and fight against Christ.
Do you not see any relation between the first few verses of Psalm 2 and Psalm 2:7-9? Do you think Psalm 2:7-9 is about the crucifixion, too?The problem with making it broader, is vs 28 —> “They” carried out “what had been decided before hand”.
“What had been decided beforehand” was the nations raging and the kings and rulers of the earth standing against God and his anointed - in other words, Christ being crucified was decided beforehand.
The “they” that carried this out was - Herod, Pilate, the gentiles, and peoples of Israel.
According to acts 4, this prophecy is about the crucifixion, so since it is not applied in a broader sense in this passage, i disagree with your position. Unless, you have any NT passages that clearly, in non symbolic or apocalyptic language, apply it more broadly?
His interpretation is based upon the fact that he only sees half of scripture half of the time. It's a symptom of the Amillennialist way of interpreting biblical scripture regarding the Kingdom of Christ. You all do it, just not all with the same passages.Do you not see any relation between the first few verses of Psalm 2 and Psalm 2:7-9? Do you think Psalm 2:7-9 is about the crucifixion, too?
Do you not see any relation between the first few verses of Psalm 2 and Psalm 2:7-9? Do you think Psalm 2:7-9 is about the crucifixion, too?
So, you think that the following passage, which references Psalm 2:8-9 in verse 15, is about Christ's death, resurrection and ascension?I definitely think there is relation.
Psalm 2:1-2 about the crucifixion
Psalm 2:7 fulfilled in the resurrection
Psalm 2:8-9, Christ already received that authority - death, resurrection, ascension.
- Acts 13:33 this he has fulfilled to us their children by raising Jesus, as also it is written in the second Psalm, “‘You are my Son, today I have begotten you.’
So according to your interpretation of scripture He destroyed the heathen with an iron rod at that time.The problem with making it broader, is vs 28 —> “They” carried out “what had been decided before hand”.
“What had been decided beforehand” was the nations raging and the kings and rulers of the earth standing against God and his anointed - in other words, Christ being crucified was decided beforehand.
The “they” that carried this out was - Herod, Pilate, the gentiles, and peoples of Israel.
According to acts 4, this prophecy is about the crucifixion, so since it is not applied in a broader sense in this passage, i disagree with your position. Unless, you have any NT passages that clearly, in non symbolic or apocalyptic language, apply it more broadly?
He refuses to even admit that all the wicked, unbelieving, and those who do not obey the gospel are killed at the return of Christ, as do many other pr-mills, even though it clearly stats that in the scriptures. These pre - mills talk about survivors who survive the return of Christ even though they are ungodly persons. You are basically trying to turn a cult believer to the truth who continually refuses New Testament scripture written by the Holy Spirit.So, you won't even apologize for the way you talked to me for no good reason by falsely accusing me of ignoring things that you now know that I did not ignore at all? Don't you know me better than that by now? I ignore NOTHING. If I talked to you the way you talked to me and then found out that what I said to you was completely inappropriate and completely misrepresented what you actually believe, I would apologize for that.
Because Jesus never said that He would ever rule over an earthly kingdom. He only ever said that His kingdom is not earthly. It did not come with observation (Luke 17:20) and is not of this world (John 18:36). What is hard to understand about that? Where did He ever say that He would rule over an earthly kingdom? He never did.
Where that takes place is irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. If it takes place on the earth it would have to be the new (renewed) earth because Jesus will be burning up this earth when He comes (2 Peter 3:10-12). Compare that Luke 19 parable to Matthew 25:31-46. What happens first at the judgment after Jesus comes? The sheep, representing believers, are told to inherit the kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the world. And they will be immortal since we know believers will all be changed to have immortal bodies when Jesus comes. At that same time, the goats, representing unbelievers, will be cast into "everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels (Matt 25:41). With me so far? So, compare Matthew 25:41 to Luke 19:27. They are talking about the same thing.
So, tell me who are the mortals at this point that you think will populate the earth, keeping in mind that believers all have mortal bodies at this point and unbelievers are all cast into the fire at this point?
Sure, let's say He returns to the earth then. Who cares? That is completely besides the point I'm making. That proves NOTHING in relation to whether Amill or Premill is true. What we need to discuss is what happens at that point when He returns? He reigns over people for a thousand years as you believe? How? Who would those people be exactly, keeping in mind what I said above?
I don't know what your point is exactly in relation to 1 Corinthians 15:28. Can you elaborate on that? That verse is related to Jesus delivering the kingdom to the Father. Obviously, the judgment would have to take place first before He does that. So? I'm not seeing your point here as it relates to that verse.
Good grief, man. You focus so much on things that are irrelevant. Okay, sure, let's say He returns to earth. So what? What is the earth like at that point and what happens at that point? That's what we are discussing here.
LOL. what foolishness? Stop your own foolishness and address the topic at hand which is regarding what happens when Jesus returns. You're so focused on trying to prove He returns to earth that you forgot you're supposed to be showing that He supposedly rules on the earth for a thousand years at that point .Where are you doing anything to show that?
Yes, those things that don't do anything to support your Premill view at all, which is such a waste of time.
Hello? Have I ever said that He doesn't set foot on earth again? No. What have I said many times? I know you forget a lot of what I say, so let me remind you. I have said many times that I believe He will renew this earth, making it the new (renewed) earth. So, I say that He will not set foot on this earth as we know it again, but I don't say He won't set foot on the earth again at all. He will set foot on the earth again after He renews it by fire first (2 Peter 3:10-13).
Okay, stop wasting time on that and show me where any of this means that He has to rule on earth for a thousand years at that point.
Sorry, but I'm not interested in your lies. Read my post #5 in this thread and learn how to properly interpret John 18:36.His interpretation is based upon the fact that he only sees half of scripture half of the time. It's a symptom of the Amillennialist way of interpreting biblical scripture regarding the Kingdom of Christ. You all do it, just not all with the same passages.
Thanks for your confirmation that no Scripture tells us that His Kingdom will be "of this world".You only see half of biblical scripture half of the time so I'm not surprised you never saw the part of my post mentioning it. Not going to repeat it.
But you will only misinterpret - change the meaning - of Biblical scripture to ensure scripture complies with your Preterist Amil theology so it's useless anyway because according to you and all other Amillennialists Christ will never inherit the nations as His Kingdom because He "already has" (even though He said His Kingdom is not now of this world), and according to you the kingdoms of this world will never become the Kingdoms of Christ because they "already are".
Your Amil friend here has already made it known that the meaning of the scriptures talking about Christ's Kingdom vs. the kingdoms of this world has been changed by Amillennialists to mean what they do not mean, and you agreed with his posts. So it's no use.
John 18:36
Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here.”
Logically a king and His servants fight for His kingdom.
No Jesus will not be reigning as a king on this earth, not then, not now or in the future.
Jesus received a heavenly kingdom. Some future day, the kingdoms of this world will become the kingdom of God by inheritance and we then have the new earth and the new heaven, but that is not this day yet, nor after any 1000 years longer of a millennial current earthly reign of Christ.
The heathen are still raging and fighting against the Father and the Son.
The only time they can no longer fight is when we get new earth and new heaven in which dwells righteousness.
Even pre-mills admit there is evil rebellion of the wicked and Satan during their earthly millennial reign.
Psalm 2
.
Why do the [a]nations [b]rage,
And the people plot a [c]vain thing?
2 The kings of the earth set themselves,
And the rulers take counsel together,
Against the Lord and against His Anointed,[d] saying,
3 “Let us break Their bonds in pieces
And cast away Their cords from us.”
4 He who sits in the heavens shall laugh;
The Lord shall hold them in derision.
5 Then He shall speak to them in His wrath,
And distress them in His deep displeasure:
6 “Yet I have [e]set My King
[f]On My holy hill of Zion.”
7 “I will declare the [g]decree:
The Lord has said to Me,
‘You are My Son,
Today I have begotten You.
8 Ask of Me, and I will give You
The nations for Your inheritance,
And the ends of the earth for Your possession.
9 You shall [h]break them with a rod of iron;
You shall dash them to pieces like a potter’s vessel.’ ”
v9, they are slain
Luke 19
11 Now as they heard these things, He spoke another parable, because He was near Jerusalem and because they thought the kingdom of God would appear immediately.
12 Therefore He said: “A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom and to return.
13 So he called ten of his servants, delivered to them ten [e]minas, and said to them, ‘Do business till I come.’
14 But his citizens hated him, and sent a delegation after him, saying, ‘We will not have this man to reign over us.’
15 “And so it was that when he returned, having received the kingdom, he then commanded these servants, to whom he had given the money, to be called to him, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading. 16 Then came the first, saying, ‘Master, your mina has earned ten minas.’ 17 And he said to him, ‘Well done, good servant; because you were faithful in a very little, have authority over ten cities.’ 18 And the second came, saying, ‘Master, your mina has earned five minas.’ 19 Likewise he said to him, ‘You also be over five cities.’
20 “Then another came, saying, ‘Master, here is your mina, which I have kept put away in a handkerchief. 21 For I feared you, because you are [f]an austere man. You collect what you did not deposit, and reap what you did not sow.’ 22 And he said to him, ‘Out of your own mouth I will judge you, you wicked servant. You knew that I was an austere man, collecting what I did not deposit and reaping what I did not sow. 23 Why then did you not put my money in the bank, that at my coming I might have collected it with interest?’
24 “And he said to those who stood by, ‘Take the mina from him, and give it to him who has ten minas.’ 25 (But they said to him, ‘Master, he has ten minas.’) 26 ‘For I say to you, that to everyone who has will be given; and from him who does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him.
27 But bring here those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me.’ ”
Thousand years means a long indeterminate period of time. Only God knows the ending of that time.And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth.
Which is not to say there will be a thousand year reign of Christ on earth--that is not what is meant by a thousand year reign on earth.
I have said this many times: "Thousand" in scripture often means: Forever.
Thus, John 18:36 and Matthew 28:18 are reconciled as both meaning: Christ was given authority over the earth forever. That's it!
But men of flesh and blood and time--and of this world, have translated and taught their own errored understanding. In other words, the scriptures are not wrong, but many have been wrong in their interpretation of them. Again, that's it! Even so, the times of their folly were to come to and end, and have come. These are the times foretold when the restraints of words sealed are to be revealed finishing the mystery of God as He declared to His servants the prophets.
You are basically saying that all Amills believe Revelation 11:15 is already fulfilled and that is absolutely not true! I certainly do not believe that. Only partial preterist Amills believe that. Don't lump all Amills together like this. That is completely disingenuous and not fair to non-preterist Amills like me.You only see half of biblical scripture half of the time so I'm not surprised you never saw the part of my post mentioning it. Not going to repeat it.
But you will only misinterpret - change the meaning - of Biblical scripture to ensure scripture complies with your Preterist Amil theology so it's useless anyway because according to you and all other Amillennialists Christ will never inherit the nations as His Kingdom because He "already has" (even though He said His Kingdom is not now of this world), and according to you the kingdoms of this world will never become the Kingdoms of Christ because they "already are".
You've understood the word 'world' in the verse to mean the earth. That's understandable - it's the modern meaning of the word.
John 18:36
Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now My kingdom is not from here.”
Logically a king and His servants fight for His kingdom.
No Jesus will not be reigning as a king on this earth, not then, not now or in the future.
Jesus received a heavenly kingdom. Some future day, the kingdoms of this world will become the kingdom of God by inheritance and we then have the new earth and the new heaven, but that is not this day yet, nor after any 1000 years longer of a millennial current earthly reign of Christ.
Lord's pray. Your kingdom come as it is in heaven on earth.........What Scripture tells us that His Kingdom will be "of this world"?
Sure, the world includes all them that are of the world. It also is everything the world is including it's dust.You've understood the word 'world' in the verse to mean the earth. That's understandable - it's the modern meaning of the word.
However, I don't think that's the right meaning. The word there translated world means something like 'the order of things.'
All of the Premills here are that way but it doesn't stop you from talking to some of them. Why do you talk to any of them if it's all just a waste of time? I'll tell you why I do. It's not for them. It's for the lurkers out there who read these discussions. Those with open minds can see that our arguments are far stronger than theirs and they can learn from us.He refuses to even admit that all the wicked, unbelieving, and those who do not obey the gospel are killed at the return of Christ, as do many other pr-mills, even though it clearly stats that in the scriptures. These pre - mills talk about survivors who survive the return of Christ even though they are ungodly persons. You are basically trying to turn a cult believer to the truth who continually refuses New Testament scripture written by the Holy Spirit.
They must have that doctrine for their false theology to function of Christ and His people ruling over stubborn evil people, Satan followers in their 1000 year reign in the flesh, striking them with a rod of iron and dashing them to pieces continuously while they get to keep on resisting the Holy Spirit.
Exactly why Christ tells us we are to wipe the dust of them off our feet, as there is no peace there in that place as in reality you are wasting your time with them. We are not required to continue with them by Christ.
3 Go your way; behold, I send you out as lambs among wolves. 4 Carry neither money bag, knapsack, nor sandals; and greet no one along the road. 5 But whatever house you enter, first say, ‘Peace to this house.’ 6 And if a son of peace is there, your peace will rest on it; if not, it will return to you. 7 And remain in the same house, eating and drinking such things as they give, for the laborer is worthy of his wages. Do not go from house to house. 8 Whatever city you enter, and they receive you, eat such things as are set before you. 9 And heal the sick there, and say to them, ‘The kingdom of God has come near to you.’
10 But whatever city you enter, and they do not receive you, go out into its streets and say, 11 ‘The very dust of your city which clings to [b]us we wipe off against you. Nevertheless know this, that the kingdom of God has come near you.’ 12 [c]But I say to you that it will be more tolerable in that Day for Sodom than for that city.
I don't shut down talking, I just move on.All of the Premills here are that way but it doesn't stop you from talking to some of them. Why do you talk to any of them if it's all just a waste of time? I'll tell you why I do. It's not for them. It's for the lurkers out there who read these discussions. Those with open minds can see that our arguments are far stronger than theirs and they can learn from us.