No! He could come tonight and rescue us, destroy the wicked, remove corruption, and glorify creation. He could come anytime. Then it is over. It is the end! The text blows Pretrib out of the water. There is no imaginary Pretrib rapture. That is a Jesuit invention.
Impossible. There has been no man of sin revealed so your contention as usual is not scriptural. You have blown nothing out of the water except what you have stated.
Additionally, make up your mind. Who so called invented the pre trib rapture, the Jesuits or John Nelson Darby. I'll help you, neither it's in the Bible.
Secondly, Augustine is one of the inventors of your false doctrine. Those that did not believe that God would keep His promise to Israel have been proven wrong by the rebirth of the nation of Israel.
This has been refuted many times. This is an historic account that is long-fulfilled. You are twisting Scripture to support your erro.
Nah. See below.
• There is no mention of the Church (as the collective body of Christ) here in Revelation 3:10. You add that unto the text.
Hmmm. Probably would help if your read verse 3
Revelation 3
7
And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth;
• There is no mention of a rapture mentioned in Revelation 3:10. It must be forced into the text.
There is no word rapture mentioned in the whole Bible, which proves nothing.
8 I know thy works: behold,
I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name.
10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience,
I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.
• There is no mention of a 7 yr trib mentioned in Revelation 3:10. It must be forced into the text.
There is no seven year tribulation. There is a 70th week of Daniel. It is not mentioned either which means absolutely nothing.
• There is no mention of a 3rd coming in Revelation 3:10. It must be forced into the text.
This is not the third coming so why would it be mentioned? Your plethora of straw men are easily knocked down.
Pretribulationalists render this promise irrelevant, meaningless and pointless, as none of the 7 churches went through your so-called end-time tribulation and none of them were raptured.
Why would these Churches go through the end times? Has the man of sin been revealed? Were you expecting these churches to be raptured thousands of years ago? Jesus said He is coming, was He wrong?
Rev 3
11 Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.
In your rational, every single church in history apart from your supposed 7-year tribulation period will automatically be rewarded by not being on earth for this period (regardless of their faithfulness or unfaithfulness).
There is no 7 year tribulation period. There is a 70th week of Daniel.
That is ridiculous. In reality, according to your argument, the Philadelphian church was not rewarded.
How in the world do you come up with this baloney? They will be rewarded when Jesus comes.
11 Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.
This type of interpretation is what is required when you have nothing concrete in Scripture to support your paradigm.
You can't even find your rapture in scripture. The things you believe are not in scripture.
Whatever the trial in view was Christ promised this early church that they would escape it. If a rapture was what Christ was pushing at, and if they had fulfilled their side of the bargain, then they would assuredly have experienced what Christ had promised them. But they didn’t! We all know: Christ is not one to break His promise. He is not a liar. He is not a deceiver. What is more, Christ doesn’t make empty promises. The fact is, despite their obedience and perseverance, they all eventually died and went the way of all believers to heaven upon death. This is evidence enough to prove that that wasn’t what He was speaking about. Are Pretribs suggesting that the Philadelphians kept their part, but Christ fell short with His? Did Jesus break His Word? This theory doesn’t make any sense.
Rev 3
11 Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.
Historically, we know that persecution overwhelmed the Church generally in Asia Minor but Christ preserved the Philadelphian congregation from the worst ravishes of the tribulation that unfolded. Jesus therefore kept His word. This proves the Posttrib position that this has already been fulfilled.
WHAT??????????????????????????????????????????????????
So the post trib rapture has happened already???????????????????????????
When did it occur??????????????????????????????