You have to learn proper context here.
I don't need a lesson about context from someone who believes in pre-trib, that's for sure. Pre-tribs take scripture out of context constantly.
John 17:15 is not speaking of the end times. The immediate subject here also was His apostles not all of us. Yes we all face persecution and death but it hasnt been under the rule of Satan incarnate.
That doesn't matter. The concept is the same for us. We don't need to be taken off of the earth in order to be protected from evil and from trials. That is a fact.
The Tribulation hour was not meant for the Bride....its judgment for the unbeliever and a last call for the remaining elect. The church isnt even mentioned at all past Rev 4 and the Tribulation saints are not part of the Bride.
Of all the many false things that pre-tribs believe, this might be the most ridiculous one. The church is mentioned several times after Revelation 4!
Revelation 6:9 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. 10 They called out in a loud voice, “How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?” 11 Then each of them was given a white robe, and they were told to wait a little longer, until the full number of their fellow servants, their brothers and sisters, were killed just as they had been.
Here, we see a description of all the souls who in the past (the past before the fifth seal) were killed for their faith and it talks about them waiting for the Lord's vengeance for a little longer until "until the full number of their fellow servants, their brothers and sisters, were killed just as they had been.". The ones who had not yet been killed are in the church. People in the church have been persecuted and killed for almost 2,000 years now, so there's no reason whatsoever to think that will ever stop happening until Christ returns and takes vengeance on His enemies (2 Thess 1:7-10).
Revelation 12:17 Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went off to wage war against the rest of her offspring—
those who keep God’s commands and hold fast their testimony about Jesus.
Surely, "those who keep God’s commands and hold fast their testimony about Jesus" are in the church. That is a description of those who are in the church.
Revelation 13:7 And it was given unto him to make war with
the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
Who else but "the saints" are in the church? NT scripture describes those in the church as saints.
Romans 1:7
To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.
1 Corinthians 1:2
Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their's and our's:
Ephesians 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God,
to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus:
Philippians 1:1 Paul and Timotheus, the servants of Jesus Christ,
to all the saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi, with the bishops and deacons:
Colossians 1:2
To the saints and faithful brethren in Christ which are at Colosse: Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
Then there's the following verse that also refers to the church:
Revelation 14:12 This calls for patient endurance on the part of
the people of God who keep his commands and remain faithful to Jesus. 13 Then I heard a voice from heaven say, “Write this: Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on.” "Yes,” says the Spirit, “they will rest from their labor, for their deeds will follow them.”
Surely, "the people of God who keep his commands and remain faithful to Jesus" are those who are in the church.
Wrong. In John 17:15 the very same Greek words translated as "keep...from" (tereo and ek) mean to be
protected from evil, not to be taken away from it. You are trying to make scripture say what you want it to say just as you do by falsely claiming that the church isn't referenced after Revelation 4.
Also note the 144000 believers who are raised up from the 12 tribes to evangelize the world- a completely pointless exercise if the church was still here.
Where does it say that they were raised up to evangelize the world? You keep making things up that aren't there just like you do with Daniel 9.
2 Thess 2:7-8
For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
"he who now letteth" is the Holy Ghost which resides within the church and the Holy Ghost/Church must be taken out of the way before the antichrist appears. Its not as if the HG will not be present at all during the Trib but it will be as it was in Jesus' day when the HG was present among believers but not within them.
You need to ask God for wisdom about this and study this for yourself instead of just letting your teachers tell you what to believe. God is perfectly capable of removing the restraining influence of the Holy Spirit without needing to take the church out of the world. Paul said that a mass falling away from the faith has to occur first before His coming and our being gathered to Him (2 Thess 2:3), so the result of the mass falling away from the faith dramatically reduces the impact of the gospel and of Christianity in the world. There is no need for the church to be removed in order for that to happen.
I explained Dan 9:27 perfectly well.
No, you absolutely did not. You relate things to that verse that are not even remotely mentioned there.
The other 69 weeks have already taken place - the last week is the time of the end.
No, it is not. There is absolutely no basis whatsoever for inserting a gap between the 69th and 70th weeks. It says that the Messiah would be cut off after the 69th week which places His death within the 70th week. That is when He confirmed the new covenant by way of His ministry, His death and resurrection and the preaching of the gospel first to Israel (Acts 1:8). The establishment of the new covenant resulted in the old covenant and its animal sacrifices and offering being made obsolete. That is what Daniel 9:27 is about.
I already showed you where the temple will be rebuilt- some of those passages also mention animal sacrifice. Yes Jesus is THE one and only sacrifice but the unbelieving Jews dont yet know that.
There are some believing Jews who know and acknowledge that. Unbelieving Jews reject that and have no excuse for that. It's not as if they have not heard about Jesus.
The temple will be rebuilt due to their unbelief and because they believe they are still bound by Mosaic sacrificial law they will resume animal sacrifices until they turn and accept Jesus as their Lord and Messiah
This is not taught anywhere in scripture. You think this supposed temple is called "the temple of God" in scripture, right? How can it be called the temple of God if it's built by Christ rejecting Jews? Surely, God Himself would not consider such a temple to be His temple and one that is worthy of being called the temple of God.
I have showed you clear scripture.
LOL. You have not even come close to clearly showing how your beliefs are taught in scripture. You attribute all kinds of things to Daniel 9 that are not referenced there at all. That's clear scripture to support your view? Not at all.
You need to open your eyes. Look this stuff up yourself.
LOL. That's rich coming from you since you obviously have not studied this carefully for yourself and have bought in to all the standard things that pre-trib dispensationalism teaches.
I long ago had a mentor who said to me that when you have questions that are easily answered with the abundant resources that we have in the Strongs Concordance or online, well he told me in no uncertain terms to get off my fat lazy butt and look it up myself- and come to him with really difficult questions. Well I am telling you the same thing
If you studied this for yourself, then why are you just repeating the same exact things that your doctrine teaches that I've heard for a long time already? I don't see anything from you that deviates at all from the standard pre-trib dispenationalist party line.