Wrangler
Well-Known Member
Did I ever ask you to accept or deny MY OPINIONS as to what those verses said??? NO!!!
Touchy. Whether you asked or not, there it is. You are reading words not in Scripture. For all to see.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Did I ever ask you to accept or deny MY OPINIONS as to what those verses said??? NO!!!
All cults deny the truth of God's Word. You KNOW that you are denying the truth of SCRIPTURE BUT CAN'T ADMIT IT AND SO YOU KEEP THE BLINDFOLD ON JUS AS THE PHARISEES DID.Touchy. Whether you asked or not, there it is. You are reading words not in Scripture. For all to see.
Jesus never said he raised himself from the dead.
Correct. There is no point in going round and round and round the same nonsense. What we need is another section on CB titled "Nonsense". There could be a ton of nonsense posted every day. Good for laughs.This thread is dead.
Heresy is not nonsense. Heretical beliefs can potentially send one to hell - especially those who deliberately add to or change the intent of God's Word.Correct. There is no point in going round and round and round the same nonsense.
Agree with the last sentence. But heresy is "spiritual nonsense".Heresy is not nonsense. Heretical beliefs can potentially send one to hell - especially those who deliberately add to or change the intent of God's Word.
HOW MANY BIBLES DOES IT TAKE FOR INDOCTRINATED PEOPLE WHO TRUST THE HERESAIC NWT INSTEAD OF WHAT THIS LIST OF 46 BIBLE INTERPRETERS USING THE SEPTUAGINT FOR TRANSLATION USE TO SEE FOR THEMSELVES THAT A BIBLE FROM THE WATCHTOWER THAT WAS WRITTEN IN THE 1800'S CAN BE SO DIFFERENT IN COMPARISON TO THIS LIST? EVEN THE DARBY/SCOFIELD BIBLE IS BETTER THAN THE NWT....and of which you will notice that it is NOT on the list at all!
◄ John 2:19 ►
Modern Translations <snipped for space>
Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up again:
This is what is correctly stated in the NWT bible from the Septuagint. However, if the NWT translators knew ANYTHING about the Greek language as they claim, then they surely would have known that the English word "temple" that Jesus was referring to in verse 19 is translated in the Greek as "naos." NAOS is the Greek word for the "Holy of Holies" in the inner sanctuary where only the High Priest was permitted to go. It is also the Greek word for "his body as the temple."(It is the area where the "ark of the covenant" was kept.)
This is what is correctly stated in the NWT bible from the Septuagint. However, the NWT translators knew ANYTHING about the Greek language as they claim, then they surely would have known that the English word "temple" that Jesus was referring to in verse 19 is translated in the Greek as "naos." NAOS is the Greek word for the "Holy of Holies" in the inner sanctuary where only the High Priest was permitted to go. (It is the area where the "ark of the covenant" was kept.)
Now the outer area where Jesus taught was in the courtyard. The building itself that surrounded the temple (where the Dome of the Rock is now) and the couryards are is referred to as "hieron" in the Greek.
In section a) the word "temple" (naos) is misconstrued in the NWT to "a building" (heiron) They knew what they were doing. That verse should read "Destroy this "body", and in three days I wil raise "my body" up" but the way they make it seem it reads thus "Destroy this building (hieron) and in three days I will raise up "this building" (hieron).
More misrepresentation of what the NWT states....your hostility is not well founded and smacks of the attitude of the Pharisees in passing on hearsay instead of facts.The "slight-of-hand" deception is this...The JW's note writers had to have done this hoping their "students" would not know any Greek. Any interlinear Bible will show that what I have concluded is truth.
HOWEVER, the NWT indoctrinational study notes are a travesty because the openly don't want their student to know the truth and that is that "both Jesus and the Father could say the same thing and be true because of the tri/unity of the Godhead.
NWT says this..."Although Jesus said: “I will raise it up,” the Scriptures clearly show that it was God who resurrected him." (Acts 10:40) Now, here in Acts 10:40 is another decption because the true reading of this verse is...."but God raised him up(NOT "IT" up)!!!
I am posting this list to show that the following religions are among those that reject the doctrine of the Trinity. The list is not exhaustive but encompasses several of the major groups and religious movements. Included is a brief explanation of each group's beliefs about the nature of God; revealing a deviation from the Trinity doctrine. I did not make this list up; it was provided by researching the internet. Those on this list are always listed as "cults." As you can see from this list, all of them were started on the east coast by "humans"; not divinely inspired through the Holy Spirit's (3rd person of the Trinity). The Evangelical Protestant Church was not started by "humans" but by our Lord God Himself with full actiity of the Tri-unity Godhead. The Evangelical Church has its roots actually in the Garden of Eden, and of which it then became more fully developed after Pentecost through divinely inspirted writings from the OT Moses to the NT John.More misrepresentation of what the NWT states....
<< hippo, I just dropped in seeing this comment and have not been following the thread>>I am posting this list to show that the following religions are among those that reject the doctrine of the Trinity. The list is not exhaustive but encompasses several of the major groups and religious movements. Included is a brief explanation of each group's beliefs about the nature of God; revealing a deviation from the Trinity doctrine. I did not make this list up; it was provided by researching the internet. Those on this list are always listed as "cults." As you can see from this list, all of them were started on the east coast by "humans"; not divinely inspired through the Holy Spirit's (3rd person of the Trinity). The Evangelical Protestant Church was not started by "humans" but by our Lord God Himself with full actiity of the Tri-unity Godhead. The Evangelical Church has its roots actually in the Garden of Eden, and of which it then became more fully developed after Pentecost through divinely inspirted writings from the OT Moses to the NT John.
For comparison purposes, the biblical Trinity doctrine is defined by The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church as "The central dogma of Christian theology, that the one God exists in three Persons and one substance, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. God is one, yet self-differentiated; the God who reveals Himself to mankind is one God equally in three distinct modes of existence, yet remains one through all eternity."
Notice the dates because the Mormons, the Christadelphians, the JW's, the Christian Scientists, and the Unitarians all originated in the USA during the same period - and of which they co-inside within the same era of Charles Nelson Darby's theory of Dispensationalism which he brought to the USA after making several trips here.
Mormonism - Latter-day Saints - Founded By: Joseph Smith, Jr., 1830.
Mormons believe that God has a physical, flesh and bones, eternal, perfect body. Men have the potential to become gods as well. Jesus is God's literal son, a separate being from God the Father and the "elder brother" of men. The Holy Spirit is also a separate being from God the Father and God the Son. The Holy Spirit is regarded as an impersonal power or spirit being. These three separate beings are "one" only in their purpose, and they make up the Godhead.
You KNOW that you are denying the truth of SCRIPTURE
I did not make this list up; it was provided by researching the internet. Those on this list are always listed as "cults."
The "ONLY WAY"? Of course not.So, by this standard, the only way to not be a cult, in your estimation, is to accept the trinity?
And "Believing a man is god" is WHO?Here is another. Believing a man is god is, by definition, a cult.
If not, then what is the purpose of the post in cults?The "ONLY WAY"? Of course not.
You avoided my question..Believing a man is god is, by definition, a cult.
It seems as though Wrangler is a good name for you because there is deception in both.So, by this standard, the only way to not be a cult, in your estimation, is to accept the trinity?
Here is another. Believing a man is god is, by definition, a cult.