Does God love burning people in hell?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

MatthewG

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2021
16,575
5,513
113
34
Fyffe
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
A photo.

Shot just 5 minutes ago of the setting sun.

A picture of Gods creation.

81AD167E-2B6B-4ED9-9548-50C96AD94E88.jpeg
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,384
848
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
...to believe all souls continue to exist beyond the grave in a conscious habitat and state of awareness with the ability to communicate, think, and act, is to believe the human soul/Spirit to be naturally and innately immortal.
Okay, well, I say that the spirit we have will exist, one way or the other, into eternity (future), and that is one of the ways that we are created in the image of God.

I put it to you that there is no immortal sinner as God's guarding the way to the tree of life after the fall attests, saying, "lest he eat and live forever, he ain't having at it".
Regarding our bodies, I totally agree. But our spirits... Admittedly, it's a little difficult to put into words. The two are fundamentally together and inseparable; the body cannot function without the spirit. But in a different but fundamental way, the two are distinct from one another; our actual selves are distinct from our bodies. You might think of all the places and ways in which Paul distinguishes between body and spirit:

* One of the most notable is Romans 7, where, after talking about the sinful human condition and applying it to himself, he asks (really laments), "Who will deliver me from this body of death?" We ~ we ~ need to be delivered from our bodies.

* Another is Ephesians 2, where, in talking about how we are saved and the mercy we have received, he says, "But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ... and raises us up with Him... so that in the coming ages He might show..." Well, our bodies, since our birth, were always alive, but yet we ~ we ~ were made alive (together with Christ)... he's speaking of our true selves, our spirits.

* And everything comes in threes, right? :) Kidding... But a third place is 1 Corinthians 15, where Paul says, "...we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed. For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality." We shall be changed; the perishable body ~ not the spirit ~ will put on the imperishable. He's speaking of the resurrection at the end of the age, in which our bodies will literally be resurrected and reunited with our selves, our spirits ~ which, until that time, will have been in heaven with Jesus ~ and eternity, the age to come, will begin.

We also see this distinction from God Himself through the prophet Ezekiel in chapter 37 of his prophecy. The valley of dry bones... such a beautiful piece of Scripture... But God says there to Ezekiel, "I will lay sinews upon you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live, and you shall know that I am the LORD." This is really a picture of our salvation... God raises us from the dead... but still, the sinews and flesh are laid upon us, our selves.

Even before all this, going back to Adam and then Eve, they were created with bodies (Adam was formed from dust, Eve from Adam's rib), but those bodies did not have life in them until God "breathed life into them" ~ put their spirits into their bodies.

Okay that was longer than I meant it to be... :)

For the repentant sinner, yes, there comes to him eternal life...
Sure...

...but this gift isn't granted him until the resurrection.
Disagree. I think Paul would, too (and of course God is the ultimate Author of all Scripture; it is God-breathed), most clearly in Ephesians 2, where, in writing to the Christians alive and in Ephesus at the time (and to us by extension), "...God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ..." and in 1 Peter 1, where Peter writes, "According to His great mercy, He has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead..." This is indisputably past tense; we Christians have been born again. Yes, there is a sense that both are true... we have been saved but are also being saved. But if you are a Christian, you can rest in that present reality... and future certainty.

Until then, like Jesus said of Lazarus, he's asleep. Unconscious. Obvious to anything going on around him.
His body, yes. See above.

Luke 16 is not a theological treatise on the state of the dead.
That's not the reason Jesus tells the parable, no. But that it depicts a conscious awareness of the present state of the physically deceased, and the desires regarding at least two things (that they would rather be "in Abraham's bosom" rather than where they are, and that others would be admonished to avoid the same predicament) is... Well, it can be disputed, as anything can, but I wouldn't advise it. :)

It is all figurative and a parable, as were all the other stories previous to that in Luke. resurrection.
Well, I agree, but they convey a larger truth of reality... and depict at least some aspects of that reality... and in various cases either exhort to obtain a particular reality or, in this case, warn to avoid that particular reality.

Grace and peace to you.
 

Jack

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
11,424
4,679
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I would be willing to concede the point if it disagreed with the rest of scripture. But to believe all souls continue to exist beyond the grave in a conscious habitat and state of awareness with the ability to communicate, think, and act, is to believe the human soul/Spirit to be naturally and innately immortal.
I put it to you that there is no immortal sinner as God's guarding the way to the tree of life after the fall attests, saying, "lest he eat and live forever, he ain't having at it".
For the repentant sinner, yes, there comes to him eternal life, but this gift isn't granted him until the resurrection. Until then, like Jesus said of Lazarus, he's asleep. Unconscious. Obvious to anything going on around him. Luke 16 is not a theological treatise on the state of the dead. It is all figurative and a parable, as were all the other stories previous to that in Luke.
No proof whatsoever that Luke 16 is a parable. Jesus doesn't lie!
 

Brakelite

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2020
9,901
7,173
113
Melbourne
brakelite.wordpress.com
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Even before all this, going back to Adam and then Eve, they were created with bodies (Adam was formed from dust, Eve from Adam's rib), but those bodies did not have life in them until God "breathed life into them" ~ put their spirits into their bodies.
When I consider what you've written above, and then compare that with what you had written previously in the same post, in order to be consistent you will now have to make a case for pre-existence. That this life is the result of a type of reincarnation. Sorry, but I'm not buying it.
 

Brakelite

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2020
9,901
7,173
113
Melbourne
brakelite.wordpress.com
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
No proof whatsoever that Luke 16 is a parable. Jesus doesn't lie!
Uh huh. So all the dead from all ages are alive and well in Abraham's bosom. I hope you don't think that is literal. But whatever it is, it must be big. It also is right next door, within a short distance, to hell where the wicked are in torment, even before they have been judged. And even though there might be a chasm between the two places, everyone can clearly see each other, and presumably hear each other, one side screaming in agony, the other delirious with joy... Despite the distractions from the other side. All literal of course. The Jews probably believed it because it was okay if their own traditions to accept such nonsense, but I don't. And I don't believe Jesus did either, He was using their own pagan myth to prove a point... Their own hypocrisy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: face2face

Jack

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
11,424
4,679
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Uh huh. So all the dead from all ages are alive and well in Abraham's bosom.
No, just God's people.
I hope you don't think that is literal.
A CERTAIN begger, a CERTAIN rich man, Moses, Abraham ... Yep absolutely literal. Doesn't say anything about being a parable.
But whatever it is, it must be big. It also is right next door, within a short distance, to hell where the wicked are in torment, even before they have been judged. And even though there might be a chasm between the two places, everyone can clearly see each other, and presumably hear each other, one side screaming in agony, the other delirious with joy... Despite the distractions from the other side. All literal of course. The Jews probably believed it because it was okay if their own traditions to accept such nonsense, but I don't. And I don't believe Jesus did either, He was using their own pagan myth to prove a point... Their own hypocrisy.
It doesn't say Lazarus can see the rich man.
 

n2thelight

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2006
4,124
797
113
61
Atlanta,Ga
Then why does the NT use the terms "everlasting", "eternal", "forever and ever"? Don't you have Luke 16 in your Bible? The rich man died but was very much alive in the fire. And the "parable" deception has been clearly refuted already, in case that's your next argument.

Luke 16
19 "There was a certain rich man who was clothed in purple and fine linen and fared sumptuously every day. 20 But there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, full of sores, who was laid at his gate, 21 desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table. Moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. 22 So it was that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels to Abraham's bosom. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 And being in torments in Hades, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 Then he cried and said, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.' 25 But Abraham said, 'Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things; but now he is comforted and you are tormented.
Everlasting death
 

Ronald David Bruno

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2020
4,634
2,320
113
Southern
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Here is the parable

The Rich Man and Lazarus​

19 “There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. 20 At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores 21 and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.

22 “The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side.24 So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’

25 “But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. 26 And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’

27 “He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my family, 28 for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’

29 “Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’

30 “‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’

31 “He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”
IT IS NOT A PARABLE!
This is not symbolic language, and is to be taken literally
. Why?
Parables DO NOT include specific names of real people, like Abraham, nor his spiritual location. Prior to Christ death and resurrection, Sheol was divided into two locations, one for the faithful to God and the other for the unfaithful, wicked reprobates.
It is also clear that the Rich man and Lazarus are real souls!

The Rich man's location is therefore real.

>Why describe two separate and distinct locations that exist after death _ in detail _ to symbolize something else if they did not exist?
>What moral truth would be gained from something abstract?

Jesus' parables were always about common experiences that people could relate to and draw meaning out of. His parables did not use detailed descriptions of fictional, abstract territories!

The message to all is a stark warning. This Rich man died and went to a place of loneliness, fire and torment. This wasn't his grave or tomb. He didn't become extinct when he died nor was he asleep. He was conscious! He asks for water, a drop, because when Lazarus was alive, he begged for scraps of food. Notice how the Rich man's pride is no longer with him - he is humbled. I don't know, if it is real humility or just an act of manipulation? He was hoping for mercy, to receive more than a drop. When he realized there would be no relief for him, he asked Abraham to send Lazarus to his brothers ( who were also real people) to warn them of this place.
> Abraham also made it clear thatbthese two locations were separated by a gulf(chasm) that no one from either location could pass over!

> The last line of the story points to another reality and parallel to this story, Jesus death and resurrection.

This whole story alludes also to judgments throughout the Bible that speak of fire and torment that ultimately leads to destruction. There is no hope for that Rich man or anyone else who is cast there, no second chance, no Purgatory, no, no redemption. This is what death means without faith in God, which is the primary reason we have a Savior. But we must believe that He is our Savior.
 
Last edited:

MatthewG

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2021
16,575
5,513
113
34
Fyffe
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
People say its not a parable when it is.

You have to choose what it is youre gonna believe.

Yes. @Brakelite

Would you consider a place where God dwells a realm?

Realm
a field or domain of activity or interest.
"the realm of applied chemistry"
 
Last edited:

Jack

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
11,424
4,679
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Everlasting death
Death never means cease to exist in the Bible.

1 Timothy 5
6 But she who lives in pleasure is dead while she lives.

But many will wish they ceased to exist!

Rev "They will be tormented day and night FOREVER and ever"
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,384
848
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
When I consider what you've written above, and then compare that with what you had written previously in the same post, in order to be consistent you will now have to make a case for pre-existence. That this life is the result of a type of reincarnation. Sorry, but I'm not buying it.
What??? LOL! My goodness. Well, I'm not going to even hazard a guess how you got here, but, hey, good for you for not buying in to pre-existence or reincarnation. LOL! Seriously, though, you sound a bit like Nicodemus in John 3. :)

Grace and peace to you.
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,384
848
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
A CERTAIN begger, a CERTAIN rich man, Moses, Abraham ... Yep absolutely literal. Doesn't say anything about being a parable.
Are you saying, Jack, that it is an actual historical event?

Grace and peace to you.
 

PinSeeker

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2021
3,384
848
113
Nashville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I see no reason to believe otherwise.
Hmmm, interesting. :)

Well, I don't know if you're a Calvinist or not (I am), but John Calvin believed it was a historical event also. There was disagreement on this even back then and before, and continues even today. I disagree (yes, even as a Calvinist, I disagree with him on this point)...

...because, a.) Luke introduces the story the same way he does the four parables that precede it, including the prodigal son; all are introduced with the generalizing formula “a certain woman/man..." (Luke 15:3, 15:8, 15:11, and 16:1), and b.) the poor man is named Lazarus, an abbreviated form of Eliezer, which means “God helps,” which magnifies his deep physical need and his even much deeper spiritual need​

...But I do agree with Calvin that it really matters not whether or not this is a parable or an historical event, that the main issue is comprehending "the doctrine which it contains."

Jesus warned us several times.
Absolutely.

Grace and peace to you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jack

Brakelite

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2020
9,901
7,173
113
Melbourne
brakelite.wordpress.com
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
A CERTAIN begger, a CERTAIN rich man, Moses, Abraham ... Yep absolutely literal. Doesn't say anything about being a parable.
Earlier in Luke 16 there were other parables...
1 ¶ And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods...

And in the previous chapter there is...
11 ¶ And he said, A certain man had two sons:

I have never heard anyone attempt to claim the story of the prodigal son or the one above as a true story. Yet neither parable is illogical or unable to be lived out in real life. Yet Luke 16, which contains incidents totally contradictory to common logic (like the saved and lost being able to talk to one another, see one another, while the lost is in torment) is presented as literal. On the basis of 'certain'? Sorry, that is not conclusive enough to prove anything. There are many features of the Rich man and Lazarus that have powerful symbolic lessons...it isn't an explanation of the after-life. It's a lesson to the Pharisees on salvation, and like other parables reveals how difficult it is for anyone to rely on wealth, birth, privilege to be saved. It was also a rebuke to the Pharisees for not sharing the truths of their religion with the peoples around them. (The 'dogs'). Not even crumbs.
It doesn't say Lazarus can see the rich man.
Aaah, but the rich man can see Abraham and Lazarus. And Abraham can both see and speak to the rich man. I presume of Lazarus is in Abraham's bosom, then they are both in the same place. Splitting hairs doesn't make the parable am historical factual event. Even though in your desperation to justify God torturing people for all eternity, you would have it so.
 

Brakelite

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2020
9,901
7,173
113
Melbourne
brakelite.wordpress.com
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
What??? LOL! My goodness. Well, I'm not going to even hazard a guess how you got here, but, hey, good for you for not buying in to pre-existence or reincarnation. LOL! Seriously, though, you sound a bit like Nicodemus in John 3. :)

Grace and peace to you.
Well, I am glad you also deny such a thing. However, you said God breathed into Adam the breath of life which elsewhere you equate to our 'real self', which enjoys the pleasure and sights of heaven and hell after death. The next logical step is to accept that the 'real self' with conscious awareness after death, is the same before birth.
 

Jack

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
11,424
4,679
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Earlier in Luke 16 there were other parables...
1 ¶ And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods...

And in the previous chapter there is...
11 ¶ And he said, A certain man had two sons:

I have never heard anyone attempt to claim the story of the prodigal son or the one above as a true story. Yet neither parable is illogical or unable to be lived out in real life. Yet Luke 16, which contains incidents totally contradictory to common logic (like the saved and lost being able to talk to one another, see one another, while the lost is in torment) is presented as literal. On the basis of 'certain'? Sorry, that is not conclusive enough to prove anything. There are many features of the Rich man and Lazarus that have powerful symbolic lessons...it isn't an explanation of the after-life. It's a lesson to the Pharisees on salvation, and like other parables reveals how difficult it is for anyone to rely on wealth, birth, privilege to be saved. It was also a rebuke to the Pharisees for not sharing the truths of their religion with the peoples around them. (The 'dogs'). Not even crumbs.

Aaah, but the rich man can see Abraham and Lazarus. And Abraham can both see and speak to the rich man. I presume of Lazarus is in Abraham's bosom, then they are both in the same place. Splitting hairs doesn't make the parable am historical factual event. Even though in your desperation to justify God torturing people for all eternity, you would have it so.
Hell will be filled with people who don't believe in Hell.

Matthew 25
41 Then He will also say to those on the left hand, 'Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels:
Revelation 20
10 The devil, who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where the beast and the false prophet are. And they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eternally Grateful
Status
Not open for further replies.