Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Okay, well, I say that the spirit we have will exist, one way or the other, into eternity (future), and that is one of the ways that we are created in the image of God....to believe all souls continue to exist beyond the grave in a conscious habitat and state of awareness with the ability to communicate, think, and act, is to believe the human soul/Spirit to be naturally and innately immortal.
Regarding our bodies, I totally agree. But our spirits... Admittedly, it's a little difficult to put into words. The two are fundamentally together and inseparable; the body cannot function without the spirit. But in a different but fundamental way, the two are distinct from one another; our actual selves are distinct from our bodies. You might think of all the places and ways in which Paul distinguishes between body and spirit:I put it to you that there is no immortal sinner as God's guarding the way to the tree of life after the fall attests, saying, "lest he eat and live forever, he ain't having at it".
Sure...For the repentant sinner, yes, there comes to him eternal life...
Disagree. I think Paul would, too (and of course God is the ultimate Author of all Scripture; it is God-breathed), most clearly in Ephesians 2, where, in writing to the Christians alive and in Ephesus at the time (and to us by extension), "...God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ..." and in 1 Peter 1, where Peter writes, "According to His great mercy, He has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead..." This is indisputably past tense; we Christians have been born again. Yes, there is a sense that both are true... we have been saved but are also being saved. But if you are a Christian, you can rest in that present reality... and future certainty....but this gift isn't granted him until the resurrection.
His body, yes. See above.Until then, like Jesus said of Lazarus, he's asleep. Unconscious. Obvious to anything going on around him.
That's not the reason Jesus tells the parable, no. But that it depicts a conscious awareness of the present state of the physically deceased, and the desires regarding at least two things (that they would rather be "in Abraham's bosom" rather than where they are, and that others would be admonished to avoid the same predicament) is... Well, it can be disputed, as anything can, but I wouldn't advise it. :)Luke 16 is not a theological treatise on the state of the dead.
Well, I agree, but they convey a larger truth of reality... and depict at least some aspects of that reality... and in various cases either exhort to obtain a particular reality or, in this case, warn to avoid that particular reality.It is all figurative and a parable, as were all the other stories previous to that in Luke. resurrection.
No proof whatsoever that Luke 16 is a parable. Jesus doesn't lie!I would be willing to concede the point if it disagreed with the rest of scripture. But to believe all souls continue to exist beyond the grave in a conscious habitat and state of awareness with the ability to communicate, think, and act, is to believe the human soul/Spirit to be naturally and innately immortal.
I put it to you that there is no immortal sinner as God's guarding the way to the tree of life after the fall attests, saying, "lest he eat and live forever, he ain't having at it".
For the repentant sinner, yes, there comes to him eternal life, but this gift isn't granted him until the resurrection. Until then, like Jesus said of Lazarus, he's asleep. Unconscious. Obvious to anything going on around him. Luke 16 is not a theological treatise on the state of the dead. It is all figurative and a parable, as were all the other stories previous to that in Luke.
When I consider what you've written above, and then compare that with what you had written previously in the same post, in order to be consistent you will now have to make a case for pre-existence. That this life is the result of a type of reincarnation. Sorry, but I'm not buying it.Even before all this, going back to Adam and then Eve, they were created with bodies (Adam was formed from dust, Eve from Adam's rib), but those bodies did not have life in them until God "breathed life into them" ~ put their spirits into their bodies.
Uh huh. So all the dead from all ages are alive and well in Abraham's bosom. I hope you don't think that is literal. But whatever it is, it must be big. It also is right next door, within a short distance, to hell where the wicked are in torment, even before they have been judged. And even though there might be a chasm between the two places, everyone can clearly see each other, and presumably hear each other, one side screaming in agony, the other delirious with joy... Despite the distractions from the other side. All literal of course. The Jews probably believed it because it was okay if their own traditions to accept such nonsense, but I don't. And I don't believe Jesus did either, He was using their own pagan myth to prove a point... Their own hypocrisy.No proof whatsoever that Luke 16 is a parable. Jesus doesn't lie!
No, just God's people.Uh huh. So all the dead from all ages are alive and well in Abraham's bosom.
A CERTAIN begger, a CERTAIN rich man, Moses, Abraham ... Yep absolutely literal. Doesn't say anything about being a parable.I hope you don't think that is literal.
It doesn't say Lazarus can see the rich man.But whatever it is, it must be big. It also is right next door, within a short distance, to hell where the wicked are in torment, even before they have been judged. And even though there might be a chasm between the two places, everyone can clearly see each other, and presumably hear each other, one side screaming in agony, the other delirious with joy... Despite the distractions from the other side. All literal of course. The Jews probably believed it because it was okay if their own traditions to accept such nonsense, but I don't. And I don't believe Jesus did either, He was using their own pagan myth to prove a point... Their own hypocrisy.
Everlasting deathThen why does the NT use the terms "everlasting", "eternal", "forever and ever"? Don't you have Luke 16 in your Bible? The rich man died but was very much alive in the fire. And the "parable" deception has been clearly refuted already, in case that's your next argument.
Luke 16
19 "There was a certain rich man who was clothed in purple and fine linen and fared sumptuously every day. 20 But there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, full of sores, who was laid at his gate, 21 desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table. Moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. 22 So it was that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels to Abraham's bosom. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 And being in torments in Hades, he lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 Then he cried and said, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.' 25 But Abraham said, 'Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things; but now he is comforted and you are tormented.
IT IS NOT A PARABLE!Here is the parable
The Rich Man and Lazarus
19 “There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. 20 At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores 21 and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.
22 “The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. 23 In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side.24 So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’
25 “But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. 26 And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’
27 “He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my family, 28 for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’
29 “Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’
30 “‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’
31 “He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”
Death never means cease to exist in the Bible.Everlasting death
What??? LOL! My goodness. Well, I'm not going to even hazard a guess how you got here, but, hey, good for you for not buying in to pre-existence or reincarnation. LOL! Seriously, though, you sound a bit like Nicodemus in John 3. :)When I consider what you've written above, and then compare that with what you had written previously in the same post, in order to be consistent you will now have to make a case for pre-existence. That this life is the result of a type of reincarnation. Sorry, but I'm not buying it.
Are you saying, Jack, that it is an actual historical event?A CERTAIN begger, a CERTAIN rich man, Moses, Abraham ... Yep absolutely literal. Doesn't say anything about being a parable.
I see no reason to believe otherwise. Jesus warned us several times.Are you saying, Jack, that it is an actual historical event?
Grace and peace to you.
Hmmm, interesting. :)I see no reason to believe otherwise.
Absolutely.Jesus warned us several times.
Earlier in Luke 16 there were other parables...A CERTAIN begger, a CERTAIN rich man, Moses, Abraham ... Yep absolutely literal. Doesn't say anything about being a parable.
Aaah, but the rich man can see Abraham and Lazarus. And Abraham can both see and speak to the rich man. I presume of Lazarus is in Abraham's bosom, then they are both in the same place. Splitting hairs doesn't make the parable am historical factual event. Even though in your desperation to justify God torturing people for all eternity, you would have it so.It doesn't say Lazarus can see the rich man.
Well, I am glad you also deny such a thing. However, you said God breathed into Adam the breath of life which elsewhere you equate to our 'real self', which enjoys the pleasure and sights of heaven and hell after death. The next logical step is to accept that the 'real self' with conscious awareness after death, is the same before birth.What??? LOL! My goodness. Well, I'm not going to even hazard a guess how you got here, but, hey, good for you for not buying in to pre-existence or reincarnation. LOL! Seriously, though, you sound a bit like Nicodemus in John 3. :)
Grace and peace to you.
Hell will be filled with people who don't believe in Hell.Earlier in Luke 16 there were other parables...
1 ¶ And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods...
And in the previous chapter there is...
11 ¶ And he said, A certain man had two sons:
I have never heard anyone attempt to claim the story of the prodigal son or the one above as a true story. Yet neither parable is illogical or unable to be lived out in real life. Yet Luke 16, which contains incidents totally contradictory to common logic (like the saved and lost being able to talk to one another, see one another, while the lost is in torment) is presented as literal. On the basis of 'certain'? Sorry, that is not conclusive enough to prove anything. There are many features of the Rich man and Lazarus that have powerful symbolic lessons...it isn't an explanation of the after-life. It's a lesson to the Pharisees on salvation, and like other parables reveals how difficult it is for anyone to rely on wealth, birth, privilege to be saved. It was also a rebuke to the Pharisees for not sharing the truths of their religion with the peoples around them. (The 'dogs'). Not even crumbs.
Aaah, but the rich man can see Abraham and Lazarus. And Abraham can both see and speak to the rich man. I presume of Lazarus is in Abraham's bosom, then they are both in the same place. Splitting hairs doesn't make the parable am historical factual event. Even though in your desperation to justify God torturing people for all eternity, you would have it so.