David in NJ
Well-Known Member
well we have moved on from that as we are unto the question of 'waters'We are not supposed to discuss the Triune Godhead-so I'm patient.
J.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
well we have moved on from that as we are unto the question of 'waters'We are not supposed to discuss the Triune Godhead-so I'm patient.
J.
As a matter of FACT, this understanding is so HUGE that you will be like - WOWAlready answered.
J.
No need to go further.90% correct and missing the 10%, which does not seem like much but it is HUGE for understanding.
Understanding that you already have but is still out there in the scriptures until you draw from them.
i could give you a clue but it would be too easy.
take this clue - it is in the NT writings (not the Gospel but further)
the answer to the 'waters' question is not PS 56:11, Yn 17:5 nor Rev 19:13No need to go further.
Bereshis (in the Beginning) was the Dvar Hashem [YESHAYAH 55:11; BERESHIS 1:1], and the Dvar Hashem was agav (along with) Hashem [MISHLE 8:30; 30:4], and the Dvar Hashem was nothing less, by nature, than Elohim! [Psa 56:11(10); Yn 17:5; Rev. 19:13]
J.
SHALOM and Good Night BrotherNo need to go further.
Bereshis (in the Beginning) was the Dvar Hashem [YESHAYAH 55:11; BERESHIS 1:1], and the Dvar Hashem was agav (along with) Hashem [MISHLE 8:30; 30:4], and the Dvar Hashem was nothing less, by nature, than Elohim! [Psa 56:11(10); Yn 17:5; Rev. 19:13]
J.
Ephesians 5:25-26 (NKJV):90% correct and missing the 10%, which does not seem like much but it is HUGE for understanding.
Understanding that you already have but is still out there in the scriptures until you draw from them.
i could give you a clue but it would be too easy.
take this clue - it is in the NT writings (not the Gospel but further)
Jesus is not God, he is the Son of God.
Jesus was not immortal - he has been immortal since his resurrection, but before that he was mortal. When Jesus was sent by God to the earth, God prepared a human body for him, and Jesus became human, just like us.
Ie “Jesus IS a human…Jesus is NOT God”…
How do you block someone?I believe you're right about that thread, as the original poster blocked me from participating any further.
J..
Dwell on it . . . right.It also means that Jesus did not inherit the sin of Mary as well - dwell on that.
As prophesied . . .REPLY: The angel informed Mary that she would conceive in her womb. Well
conception within a woman's womb can't happen without involving her
ovum, i.e. her seed.
Just hover over the picture of the person you want to block.How do you block someone?
@Pearl Would it be all right if I discussed the issue of the Trinity in PM with another member?
John 1:14 (NKJV) – "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth."Theological term of the day -> enhypostasia.
But do not discuss it.
John 1:14 (NKJV) – "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth."
This passage affirms the incarnation, where the eternal Logos (the Word) took on human flesh. The idea of enhypostasia helps explain how Christ's humanity was real but not separate from His divine person.
Colossians 2:9 (NKJV) – "For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily."
This verse teaches the fullness of the divine nature dwelling in the person of Christ. Enhypostasia affirms that Christ's human nature was united with His divine nature, supporting the idea that His divinity and humanity co-exist in one person.
Philippians 2:6-7 (NKJV) – "...who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men."
This highlights the self-emptying of Christ in His incarnation. The term enhypostasia helps clarify that, in taking on human form, Christ did not become a separate human person but remained one divine person with two natures.
Hebrews 2:14 (NKJV) – "Inasmuch then as the children have partaken of flesh and blood, He Himself likewise shared in the same, that through death He might destroy him who had the power of death, that is, the devil."
Here, Christ's full participation in human nature is emphasized, consistent with the theological assertion that His human nature was real and complete, yet it was always united with His divine nature.
While the terminology enhypostasia is not found in Scripture, the underlying theological concept is based on the Bible’s portrayal of Christ’s unified personhood. Scripture emphasizes that Christ is one person with two natures (divine and human) and does not divide or separate His humanity and divinity into two persons. The term was developed to preserve the biblical truth of Christ's personhood against heretical teachings that either denied His full divinity or humanity.
In conclusion, the term enhypostasia reflects biblical teaching about the person of Christ, even if it is a theological construct not directly stated in Scripture.
[ChatGPT]
Why hide the Aleithia/emes?
J.
So why bring up something "--but do not discuss?"Don’t hide anything, but we can’t talk about it here.
So why bring up something "--but do not discuss?"
So where do you want to talk about it?
J.