Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    No, I mean that all of us human beings are at this instant in possession of what existential phenomenological thought calls "absolute ontological freedom", i.e., we are (the) Absolute. We continually live and engage ourselves as absolute freedom pre-reflectively, i.e., we do our freedom without...
  2. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Nothing, including Scripture, can be written to be read/comprehended in a precise and pre-determined way. The moment I write something and, cast it out into the world, I lose all control over how it is read, interpreted, taken, understood, by others. Willie T is not cognizant of the...
  3. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Mankind, aside from the cosmos, is the highest creative being on Earth and, is indeed an organizer via who's concantenations sublimely superb architecture stands, and has stood over the past many thousands of years. Man created a means to finally walk on the moon; to erase Hiroshima; yes, you...
  4. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    I am not quite stupid enough to openly advocate "breaking" law in the commonly accepted sense, which means to "violate law"; for I do not desire to be perceived as openly advocating rebellion. I am devoted to breaking the law at the purely theoretical level, by demonstrating, via describing the...
  5. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Wow, you are every bit as abstruse as I, though via a simple wording...
  6. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Willie T; Precisely! Wow, what an embarrassment, the great Duane-deity slipped/erred and, for a mere nanosecond, appeared to be a mere human; I am sincerely ashamed of myself; which, anyway, is precisely where Willie T wants me, i.e., as a foibled shameful failure of a being...Are you happy...
  7. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Right, the Judge is acting self-inconsistently, contradictorily, stupidly; he is being precisely the violent predator that he is; who sordidly makes his very living via doing violence to other human beings, in the name of a language of law which, in fact, is not efficient to induce either the...
  8. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Yes, in a sense I am proffering a more efficient model for civilization, wherein we humans do not continually rail against and prohibit precisely what we are as beings, via naming our habitual conduct ''sin''. An absolutely authentic ''grace'' would be structured such that man can simultaneously...
  9. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    marks; Wow, beautifully written and precisely/incisively thought-out; excellent; however I am not suggesting laws merely be changed, rather, I am suggesting that via resisting and doing a theoretical destruction of the very notion of law, we humans may dialectically arrive at another approach to...
  10. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Grunt; My original paragraph made sense; the rewrite makes sense; you pretend not to be able to follow either; your claimed inability to fathom what is being proposed by the language employed is, perhaps, ascribable to a lack of intellectual instrumentation on your part, because, I consistently...
  11. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    bbyrd009; I am not merely maintaining that law is inadequate, I am saying that it is a misnomer and complete failure, and, I am explaining precisely why it is a failure, and, am suggesting that we may possibly re-model mere failing law, via employing our human ontological structure as pattern...
  12. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    The viability of law as a motivational force exercised on a basis of punishment, purportedly efficient to make and maintain decent civil interpersonal conduct, is questionable in terms of the incorrectness of scholars of jurisprudence in regard to a supposedly conduct-originative law linguistic...
  13. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    You missed my recently edited explanation of how we evaluate possibility... We now look back on the Egyptian assertion Isis resurrected whole after being cut into pieces as being an absurdity, the same will happen for Christ unless He indeed returns, which I wish He would if indeed He can.
  14. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    No, it is not merely my "idea'', it is my knowledge regarding resurrection. There is evidence we are now, since Dr. Hubble, observing of the bang, which is the fact that we see the universe expanding now; space/time is still expanding in every direction; other galaxies are moving away from us...
  15. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    You insist on proceeding by insult. A troll is someone who is purposely attempting to sow discord among the members of a forum. Your constant ad hominem attacks against my person, in company with DNB, are trolling, because you have,together, precipitated discord between yourselves and I via...
  16. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    marks; I can maintain that coming back from death is impossible since there has never been a verified/verifiable evidentiary record made of an instance of a return from a bonified death; there is only Christian pure assertion that Christ did, (no one capable of determining for an absolute...
  17. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    In this theoretical attempt to identify the Gospel as having been authored by Roman scholars, mention is made of an instance where Josephus convinced a Roman officer to release three crucified friends. of which two died and one revived:
  18. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Wow look at that bowsprit, it must be twenty feet. I've never seen an aftsprit!