Search results

Law is the language published in ink on paper in Statute books; Legislative enactments; Judicial decisions; County ordinances. Fine, the fact that you personally have no idea what I am talking about does not establish that my propositions are nonsensical or unintelligible; I am talking about...

Renniks; Ì am speaking of human determination; of human determination to act, or not to act. The alternative to law being determinative/originative of human conduct, I set forth as being Spinoza's dictum ''determinatio negatio est". i.e., determination is negation. All decisions (intentions)...

009; ''...maybe if you were to detail why i found myself in this situation in the first place?...'' You have been ''thrown'' into the situation in which you are being continually demanded and commanded, by both societal law and scripture, to act only on the basis of law and scripture, and you...

I am not saying merely that I do not want to be beholden to law. I am saying, again and again, that law is not in fact an efficacy among men; that law is not in fact determinative of human conduct; nonetheless, we keep insisting persons determine themselves by law, or, be punished, up to being...

Okay, lets. Replace the inauthoritative authority in the proposed scenario with a police officer, or, a constable...

When you go in front of a magistrate, who himself absolutely thinks his actions regarding you are bound and determined by law, it will be clear to you that you too are deemed to have been bound and determined by given law, and/or, to have bound and determined yourself, by law, to do what is...

Law is a global religion, grounded upon the faith of pretending to know that language of law is a determinative force efficient to cause persons to do, or not do, prescribed and/or proscribed acts, while, in fact, human action arises only on the basis of the recognition of desideratum; thus...

009; Link to what it claims 48 intensions of imo: IMO - Slang/Internet Slang

Yes you would have done better in England were you wont to read Webster's. A college professor in a philosophy of law course happily admitted that he routinely just plain read Webster's; he then said that in law making very fine distinctions among/between terms is extremely important.

Yes, wow, if I noticed that 27,000 figure it didn't sink-in. I am going to study very hard so that I can write to 009 entirely in abbreviation! zzix is my abr. for 009, z for zero, ix is a Roman nine, then, I will be totally cool... Like: IMO zzix prolly abr irl...or, irl zzix prolly imo abr

zzix; Nonetheless, I see an incisive intelligence exhibited by your writing, and when you write without abbreviations your writing is delightful/impressive. I got that one after a while, irl, in real life.. dcm

009/zzix I am totally wary of Scott; he is a Willie T type oppressive personality. which enjoys inflicting psychological discomfort on others via cruelly prodding a person without a sound basis in reason, i.e., irrational insult unfairly issued in constantly repeated doses; I can't countenance...

The abbreviation for''in my opinion'' does appear in Webster's Dictionary as IMO, in upper case letters only. I forgot to look up 'prolly' there, I'll go back and look 'prolly' up in Webster's... No, 'prolly' is a no show in Webster's, which does not mean that it is not common usage; it just...

I decripted that one, in real life. I'll bet a million dollars 009 speaks with abbreviations, which could possibly be fun/funny/comical; there certainly is an element of the comic in so frequently employing abbreviation in both writing and speaking.

Nice thinking Amadeus. If I remember correctly Webster's does list abbreviations; I'll check it out online if it is available in an unabridged edition. I do not recall seeing My Fair Lady. Yes, I think I have seen two versions of the piece of cinema entitled Pygmalion; the latest with Leslie...

If I am honestly confounded by a certain usage, I absolutely permit myself to ask what on earth it is all about, and do not even think to just go along with a mysterious inscrutability, in order to avoid embarrassing myself by possibly appearing foolish. Asking questions is fundamental and is...

Yes, precisely, preserved when you know/what imo proclaims, however, when one has no hint of what imo means, its presence is experienced as a totally distracting/confusing/detracting/painful aberration.

Pisteuo; I entirely fail to see how ''prolly'' is derived from 'probably' when probably has only one 'l'!? Duane

Indeed I did ask you long time ago what imo was attempting to denote. Since you ask, what on earth does prolly mean??