Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    aspen; I sincerely appreciate your reaction at post#278, and, never responded to your post #268, because I could not definitively determine if you were agreeing with my reaction to 009's internet slang, or what! I am very glad you have made an appearance here on this my thread, and look forward...
  2. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Wow, marks, a beautiful sentiment on your part. You are very insightfully correct regarding my presence on this site! After having been here for a while, I am seeing that all this interchange-tension is the kind of edifying mind-stretch you referenced earlier on. Duane
  3. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    009; I am profoundly impressed that Hegel furthered the enunciation of Spinoza's dictum, and did an excellent rendition/extension thereof. I have about zero direct study of Hegel's written works, and, have mostly knowledge of him through secondary sources, since age fourteen, which is a lot of...
  4. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    009; I've followed my own advice and, availed myself of the use of the fingertip world-wide-inter-network-webisphere, in order to possibly achieve comprehension of what 'imo' is supposed to denote. Turns out that there are at least six possible intensions of 'imo', thus, via your employment of...
  5. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Thank you for reading and responding; I appreciate that a lot. I mean that the origination of the political sciences, whereby we rule ourselves, is in thought, and, that no physical warfare takes place within pure thinking. I am at a loss to know what many portions of your writing is saying...
  6. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    009; I am saying that the state of affairs we are living now wherein we deem ourselves to be ruling ourselves via the language of law is precisely a chaotic state because we are deluded to think that law is in fact a means of controlling human conduct, when, as a given state of affairs, law...
  7. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    009; What I am proposing is bringing enough American grassroots people to a sufficient understanding of how their human freedom actually ticks, that they are fully and dangerously able to tell all the actually intellectually-sissy Willie T type cruel personalities, currently legislating and...
  8. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Deeply appreciate you taking the time to consider and respond to my description of the origin of an intentional human act; which description is purely Sartreian and is employing the precise language Sartre employs in Chapter 4 of his ''Being and Nothingness'', 1943. I have already posted lengthy...
  9. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    It cannot be gotten through your thick head that it is not about me as a person, but, rather, about the concepts I am describing, i.e., whether or not they are theoretically intelligible; however, if you absolutely cannot even begin to follow and understand what I am setting forth, you should...
  10. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    What I think what persons are attempting to say with that exclamation is "I'm just plain too stuck on stupid and so horridly miserably minimally educated, that I can only read/think at third grade level, and, there is very very little chance that I can understand writing which is typical of...
  11. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    I fail to understand what you mean when you say I prefer to become like a little kid?!
  12. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    If it is not in English what is it in!? It is some of the best and most beautifully written writing I have done recently and I tossed it right off in about fifteen minutes. It explains being reflectively free. One cannot introduce others to the notion of nihilation by using some other term!!!
  13. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    009; I have been waiting for someone to finally ask that question. We are constantly forming projects to do things which we have not yet accomplished. Our projects are intentional choices to act on such and such a wise; and, we simply just normally go about the business of doing intentional...
  14. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    009; YOU HAVE BEEN RESPONDED TO. It is just that the response did not go through in what I consider the normal way, and is part of the small italic reproduction of the statement of the member one is responding to, which appears at the head of most every response. I last responded at post #242...
  15. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    I, daily, went to assist my dad in a rest home for years. I am supremely familiar with the extreme negligence which is continually practiced in that environment by the poor well-meaning Filipino staff members...you fail to realize how extremely often I purposely do not employ and avoid the term...
  16. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Yes, others are indeed not as intently thinking about and explaining why law is a vain means to having civilization, civilization wherein law is not centrally/predominantly a contrived criminal inauthoritative road to attaining extreme wealth; thereby I do exhibit a great leap; however, yes, I...
  17. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    If you always now and in future merely provincially perceive the sociosphere predominantly in terms of scriptural descriptions of what God did, or intended to do, limiting yourself only to a scriptural interpretation of the world you live in, you are not, merely thereby, efficient to advance...
  18. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    Beloved marks; If Christ did not think He could raise our selves to a future higher engagement in our inherent dignity/nobility, He would not have ever attempted to exhort us to reflectively practice Love and the Golden Rule. As Amadeus has so correctly pointed out, Christ expected we would do...
  19. D

    LAW IS NEITHER OBEYED DISOBEYED NOR BROKEN / AN EXISTENTIAL ONTOLOGICAL DISPROOF OF LAW

    It is senselessly in vain for you to constantly second-guess the structure of my responses and to suggest how you, in every instance, know better/best what I should have said or should say!? You speak as if you are in possession of the perfect scripts whereby to judge each of mine inadequate...