Search results

No, my friend. I am not banned. I just posted in that thread and another (just now). It may have been a faulty link. There is also a message at the top of the page to warn posters on a political matter. But that is unrelated to me. If this new link does not work, try signing up to be a...

What oldest manuscripts are you talking about? If you are educated on this topic even remotely, you would know that the Modern Bibles are based on the Nestle and Aland apparatus (which has Vaticanus and Sinaiticus primacy). So if you are for popular Modern Scholarship, you follow the Vaticanus...

It is truly sad people just reject verifiable information that defends the KJV / TR over the lies of scholars that cannot be verified as being true. Again, it’s like the Media in the Leftist machine. People just believe the Media blindly and they do not do their own homework and check out to...

James White in his book that attacks the KJV-only belief, he mislabels people who are not even KJV-only as being so. So he is falsely slandering others. He also has lied about Erasmus. Granted, I am sure there are some scholars who may not lie. But there are deceptions in the Modern Bible...

In addition, both the Westcott and Hort 1881 NT Greek and the Nestle and Aland 28th edition have Vaticanus and Sinaiticus primacy. Meaning these two manuscripts are given significant weight in both the Westcott and Hort Greek (which was used for the Revised Version) and the Nestle and Aland...

So the quote I gave you is inaccurate to what Westcott and Hort said? You are unable to read the half title page I told you about for the Revised Version? I cannot help you if you are unable to figure it out, my friend. As for your claim that the Nestle and Aland is not largely related to the...

So you can go to Archive.org and look at the half title page of the Revised Version (which is in the beginning of the book). It says that it is the version set forth in 1611. This was because Westcott and Hort were commissioned to do a KJV update. However, everyone today knows the Revised...

Your welcome. May the Lord Jesus Christ bless you and yours.

First, it is silly in my view for you to imply there are no conspiracies in life. They are happening now in the Leftist Machine. Personally, I am actually not much into conspiracy theories (Especially when it does not deal with things that do not really affect our lives currently like looking...

Check my write-up here, brother: https://www.christianforums.com/threads/two-aspects-of-salvation-believers-need-to-be-concerned-with.8284898/?amp=1

That’s because you are buying what the Modern scholars are saying. But they have lied over the years and continue to lie on other things in scholarship and so that does not give me any confidence on their story involving the Comma that you have swallowed, hook, line, and sinker. The grammar...

This again is false because you said you did not want to hear anymore about Georgios. Georgios is a key figure in the discussion involving the grammar points involving my defense of the Comma. But because it does not fit your narrative, this is why you shut this kind of conversation down. So...

But it is not just it being popular for no reason. There are many other things that factor into why it is popular. Granted, if you are hard pressed not to see it, then no evidence I bring forth will truly matter to you. You will continue to remain in your bubble information world as you slice...

There were other translations out there. But they never took hold. Even the creators of other Modern translations threatened that the KJV would be obsolete because of their translation. This happened repeatedly in the 1700s, 1800s, and 1900s. But the KJV still endured. It caused three of...

The point is that cult leaders did not like the KJV because it was considered THE Bible at one time by Bible believing Christians.

The Catholic New American Bible that came out in the 1970s forbid the Catholic layperson from reading the KJV. Here is a video showing it: Granted, this has changed in recent years. There is a Catholic KJV with the apocryphal books in it. But the point here is that at one time, the...

That really doesn’t help you. That actually helps to prove my case because you don’t use something that is bad or untruthful as bait to deceive people. They are using something true and then playing the switch-a-roo trick.

There is the internet. Surely you can check that for the sources within a few seconds at the touch of a button, right?

You mean the Mormons. The JWs have their New World Translation today (Which is based on the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus). They also used a translation done by spiritualist, as well. Also, some Mormons believe the KJV has errors in it. They see the Book of Mormon as more authoritative. The KJV...

Yes, I remember you giving yourself this glorified title before. It’s not really factual because you deny new truth or information when you are presented with it. For example: When I brought up the grammar points on defending the Comma in 1 John 5:7, your response was not like, “Oh, yeah...